Cited by 899HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsMedication Adherence and ComplianceHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment

Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy in Sub-Saharan Africa and North America: A Meta-analysis

Mills, Edward J., Nachega, Jean B., Buchan, Iain, Orbinski, James, Attaran, Amir, Singh, Sonal, Rachlis, Beth, Wu, Ping +5 more·2006·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Adherence to antiretroviral therapy is a powerful predictor of survival for individuals living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and AIDS. Concerns about incomplete adherence among patients living in poverty have been an important consideration in expanding the access to antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan Africa. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate estimates of antiretroviral therapy adherence in sub-Saharan Africa and North America. DATA SOURCES: Eleven electronic databases were searched along with major conference abstract databases (inclusion dates: inception of database up until April 18, 2006) for all English-language articles and abstracts; and researchers and treatment advocacy groups were contacted. Study Selection and Data Abstraction To best reflect the general population, studies of mixed populations in both North America and Africa were selected. Studies evaluating specific populations such as men only, homeless individuals, or drug users, were excluded. The data were abstracted in duplicate on study adherence outcomes, thresholds used to determine adherence, and characteristics of the populations. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed in which heterogeneity was examined using multivariable random-effects logistic regression. A sensitivity analysis was performed using Bayesian methods. DATA SYNTHESIS: Thirty-one studies from North America (28 full-text articles and 3 abstracts) and 27 studies (9 full-text articles and 18 abstracts) from sub-Saharan Africa were included. African studies represented 12 sub-Saharan countries. Of the North American studies, 71% used patient self-report to assess adherence; this was true of 66% of the African assessments. Studies reported similar thresholds for adherence monitoring (eg, 100%, >95%, >90%, >80%). A pooled analysis of the North American studies (17,573 patients total) indicated a pooled estimate of 55% (95% confidence interval, 49%-62%; I2, 98.6%) of the populations achieving adequate levels of adherence. Our pooled analysis of African studies (12,116 patients total) indicated a pooled estimate of 77% (95% confidence interval, 68%-85%; I2, 98.4%). Study continent, adherence thresholds, and study quality were significant predictors of heterogeneity. Bayesian analysis was used as an alternative statistical method for combining adherence rates and provided similar findings. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that favorable levels of adherence, much of which was assessed via patient self-report, can be achieved in sub-Saharan African settings and that adherence remains a concern in North America.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.296.6.679

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mills, E. J., Nachega, J. B., Buchan, I., Orbinski, J., Attaran, A., Singh, S., Rachlis, B., Wu, P., Cooper, C., Thabane, L., Wilson, K., Guyatt, G. H., & Bangsberg, D. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2006-08-09
Volume
296
Issue
6
Pages
679
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2100049335
Cited by
899
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 77 · 2012: 73
FWCI
36.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k24aa015287-03)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (K23A106858201)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA015287)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 54907, R01MH054907)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI27763, AI005535901, P30AI027763)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Keywords
antiretroviral therapy adherence, HIV/AIDS, sub-Saharan Africa, North America, patient self-report, adherence thresholds, antiretroviral therapy access, poverty, treatment outcomes, mixed populations, patient-reported outcomes, HIV prevention and treatment
MeSH terms
Humans, North America, Patient Compliance, HIV Infections, Africa South of the Sahara, Anti-HIV Agents, Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review