Cited by 288Medication Adherence and CompliancePatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareDiabetes Management and Education

Improving patient adherence: a three-factor model to guide practice

DiMatteo, M. Robin, Haskard-Zolnierek, Kelly B., Martin, Leslie R.·2012·Health Psychology Review

Abstract

Patient nonadherence is widespread and costly. This paper provides a brief narrative review of research on (non)adherence and validates a clinically useful three-factor heuristic model to guide practitioners as they work with patients to improve adherence. This model is based on the most stable findings from meta-analyses and large-scale empirical studies, reflects the realities of medical practice and offers recommendations for assessing and enhancing patient adherence, particularly in chronic disease management. The model comprises three important clinical actions: (1) insuring that patients have the right information and know how to adhere – including listening to patients’ concerns, encouraging their participation and partnership in decision-making, building trust and empathy, and enhancing recall; (2) helping patients believe in their treatment and become motivated to commit to it – that is, addressing the cognitive, social, cultural normative and contextual factors that affect patients’ beliefs, attitudes and motivation; and (3) assisting patients to overcome practical barriers to treatment adherence and develop a workable strategy for long-term disease management – including assessing and enhancing patients’ social support, identifying and treating their depression and helping patients overcome cost-related treatment barriers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17437199.2010.537592

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DiMatteo, M. R., Haskard-Zolnierek, K. B., & Martin, L. R.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • La Sierra University (US)
Corresponding author
Martin, Leslie R.
Venue
Health Psychology Review
Published
2012-03
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
74-91
ISSN
  • 1743-7199 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-7202
OpenAlex
W1970746596
Cited by
288
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
FWCI
10.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Health Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
medication adherence, patient non-adherence, three-factor model, chronic disease management, patient-provider communication, shared decision-making, treatment motivation, social support, depression, patient recall, health beliefs and attitudes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review