Cited by 868Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis

Open access
Levy, Mitchell M., Dellinger, R. Phillip, Townsend, Sean R., Linde-Zwirble, Walter T., Marshall, John C., Bion, Julian, Schorr, Christa, Artigas, Antonio +9 more·2010·Intensive Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC or "the Campaign") developed guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. A performance improvement initiative targeted changing clinical behavior (process improvement) via bundles based on key SSC guideline recommendations on process improvement and patient outcomes. DESIGN AND SETTING: A multifaceted intervention to facilitate compliance with selected guideline recommendations in the ICU, ED, and wards of individual hospitals and regional hospital networks was implemented voluntarily in the US, Europe, and South America. Elements of the guidelines were "bundled" into two sets of targets to be completed within 6 h and within 24 h. An analysis was conducted on data submitted from January 2005 through March 2008. MAIN RESULTS: Data from 15,022 subjects at 165 sites were analyzed to determine the compliance with bundle targets and association with hospital mortality. Compliance with the entire resuscitation bundle increased linearly from 10.9% in the first site quarter to 31.3% by the end of 2 years (P<0.0001). Compliance with the entire management bundle started at 18.4% in the first quarter and increased to 36.1% by the end of 2 years (P = 0.008). Compliance with all bundle elements increased significantly, except for inspiratory plateau pressure, which was high at baseline. Unadjusted hospital mortality decreased from 37 to 30.8% over 2 years (P = 0.001). The adjusted odds ratio for mortality improved the longer a site was in the Campaign, resulting in an adjusted absolute drop of 0.8% per quarter and 5.4% over 2 years (95% CI, 2.5-8.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The Campaign was associated with sustained, continuous quality improvement in sepsis care. Although not necessarily cause and effect, a reduction in reported hospital mortality rates was associated with participation. The implications of this study may serve as an impetus for similar improvement efforts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00134-009-1738-3

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 2016 SSC guideline recommended a minimum of 30 ml/kg ideal body weight IV crystalloids in initial fluid resuscitation, based on observational evidence.

    “The 2016 SSC guideline issued a recommendation for using a minimum of 30 ml/kg (ideal body weight) of IV crystalloids in initial fluid resuscitation. This fixed volume of initial resuscitation was based on observational evidence [62].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levy, M. M., Dellinger, R. P., Townsend, S. R., Linde-Zwirble, W. T., Marshall, J. C., Bion, J., Schorr, C., Artigas, A., Ramsay, G., Beale, R., Parker, M. M., Gerlach, H., Reinhart, K., Silva, E., Harvey, M., Regan, S., & Angus, D. C.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • Cooper University Hospital (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (GB)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust (GB)
  • Guy's Hospital (GB)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • Vivantes Klinikum (DE)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Levy, Mitchell M.
Venue
Intensive Care Medicine
Published
2010-01-13
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
222-231
ISSN
  • 0342-4642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1238
OpenAlex
W2134689623
Cited by
868
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 73 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 84 · 2013: 93 · 2012: 86
FWCI
61.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Intensive Care Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Edwards Lifesciences
  • Eisai
  • European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Keywords
Surviving Sepsis Campaign, severe sepsis, septic shock, guideline adherence, quality improvement, in-hospital mortality, sepsis resuscitation
MeSH terms
Health Promotion, Humans, Medical Audit, Shock, Septic, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Hospital Mortality, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Reticulocyte Count, Sepsis, Guideline Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review