Cited by 231Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Spider fearful individuals attend to threat, then quickly avoid it: Evidence from eye movements.

Open access
Rinck, Mike, Becker, Eni S.·2006·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

According to cognitive models of anxiety, anxiety patients exhibit an early reflexive attentional bias toward threat stimuli, which may be followed by intentional avoidance of these stimuli. To determine the time course of attentional vigilance and avoidance, the authors conducted an eye-tracking study in which 22 highly spider fearful participants (SFs) and 23 nonanxious control participants (NACs) studied groups of 4 pictures (spider, butterfly, dog, and cat). The authors found that the very first fixation was on a spider picture more often in SFs than in NACs. However, SFs quickly moved their eyes away from the spider they had fixated first, yielding shorter gaze durations than NACs. Afterward, SFs exhibited shorter gaze durations on spiders than NACs for the rest of the 1-min presentation time. This early reflexive attentional bias toward threat followed by avoidance of threat may explain earlier failures to find attentional biases in anxiety.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.115.2.231

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In specific phobia, eye-tracking studies have revealed that individuals with phobia present a hypervigilance-avoidance pattern characterised by accelerated detection of the feared stimulus, followed by rapid and sustained avoidance of it.

    “In the case of SP, thanks to the use of eye-tracking technology, some studies have revealed that individuals with phobia present a hypervigilance–avoidance pattern characterised by accelerated detection of the feared stimulus, followed by rapid and sustained avoidance of it.23 25 26”

    From Effectiveness of a projection-based augmented reality exposure system in treating cockroach phobia: Study protocol of a randomised controlled trial (2023) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Abstract reports that highly spider-fearful participants fixated spider pictures first more often than controls, then looked away quickly and spent less time looking at them for the rest of the one-minute presentation. The claim generalizes this finding to individuals with specific phobia, whereas the study tested highly spider-fearful participants and does not establish the pattern across specific phobias. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies that evaluated ocular movements during a free exploration task found the hypervigilance-avoidance pattern typically associated with patients with phobia.

    “Specifically, in the small animal phobia research field, studies that evaluated ocular movements during a free exploration task found the hypervigilance–avoidance pattern typically associated with patients with phobia.23 25 26”

    From Effectiveness of a projection-based augmented reality exposure system in treating cockroach phobia: Study protocol of a randomised controlled trial (2023) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Abstract reports an eye-tracking study in which highly spider-fearful participants first fixated on spider pictures more often than controls, then quickly looked away. The Discussion describes free viewing, but the Participants section identifies the group as highly fearful university students, not patients diagnosed with phobia. The citation supports the vigilance–avoidance pattern, but not that clinical population label. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is strong evidence in the field of anxiety disorders that people with anxiety preferentially attend to feared stimuli, and this attentional bias plays an important role in the aetiology and maintenance of anxiety disorders.

    “There is strong evidence in the field of anxiety disorders that people with anxiety preferentially attend to feared stimuli,22 23 and this attentional bias plays an important role in the aetiology and maintenance of anxiety disorders.24”
  • Epoch-related indicators may be too indirect to reliably capture the orienting of gaze.

    “Epoch-related indicators may be too indirect to reliably capture the orienting of gaze, despite two studies finding convergence between event- and epoch-related measures of orienting (Armstrong et al., 2010; Rinck & Becker, 2006).”
  • The present finding of decreased maintenance of gaze on threat in spider phobia held throughout longer trials (9 s, 60 s).

    “For example, the present finding of decreased maintenance of gaze on threat in spider phobia was found to hold throughout the course of longer trials (9 s: Pflugshaupte et al., 2007; 60 s: Rinck & Becker, 2006).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rinck, M., & Becker, E. S.
Affiliations
Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2006-05
Volume
115
Issue
2
Pages
231-238
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2075410555
Cited by
231
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 18
FWCI
17.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Ri 600/6-1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
spider phobia, anxiety, threat avoidance, gaze duration, eye movements, fixation patterns, cognitive models of anxiety, time course of attention
MeSH terms
Animals, Attention, Escape Reaction, Eye Movements, Fear, Humans, Phobic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Spiders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review