The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Core Competencies in Evidence-Based Practice for Health Professionals: Consensus Statement Based on a Systematic Review and Delphi Survey
Open accessAbstract
Importance: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is necessary for improving the quality of health care as well as patient outcomes. Evidence-based practice is commonly integrated into the curricula of undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing professional development health programs. There is, however, inconsistency in the curriculum content of EBP teaching and learning programs. A standardized set of minimum core competencies in EBP that health professionals should meet has the potential to standardize and improve education in EBP. Objective: To develop a consensus set of core competencies for health professionals in EBP. Evidence Review: For this modified Delphi survey study, a set of EBP core competencies that should be covered in EBP teaching and learning programs was developed in 4 stages: (1) generation of an initial set of relevant EBP competencies derived from a systematic review of EBP education studies for health professionals; (2) a 2-round, web-based Delphi survey of health professionals, selected using purposive sampling, to prioritize and gain consensus on the most essential EBP core competencies; (3) consensus meetings, both face-to-face and via video conference, to finalize the consensus on the most essential core competencies; and (4) feedback and endorsement from EBP experts. Findings: From an earlier systematic review of 83 EBP educational intervention studies, 86 unique EBP competencies were identified. In a Delphi survey of 234 participants representing a range of health professionals (physicians, nurses, and allied health professionals) who registered interest (88 [61.1%] women; mean [SD] age, 45.2 [10.2] years), 184 (78.6%) participated in round 1 and 144 (61.5%) in round 2. Consensus was reached on 68 EBP core competencies. The final set of EBP core competencies were grouped into the main EBP domains. For each key competency, a description of the level of detail or delivery was identified. Conclusions and Relevance: A consensus-based, contemporary set of EBP core competencies has been identified that may inform curriculum development of entry-level EBP teaching and learning programs for health professionals and benchmark standards for EBP teaching.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Frenk, J., Chen, L., Bhutta, Z. A., Cohen, J., Crisp, N., Evans, T., Fineberg, H., Garcia, P., Ke, Y., Kelley, P., et al. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61854-5 · Cited by 5,960
The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance
Miller, G. E. (1990) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-199009000-00045 · Cited by 4,883
Diamond, I. R., Grant, R. C., Feldman, B. M., Pencharz, P. B., Ling, S. C., Moore, A. M., & Wales, P. W. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002 · Cited by 3,740
Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use
Fink, A., Kosecoff, J., Chassin, M., & Brook, R. H. (1984) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.74.9.979 · Cited by 2,089
Health professions education: a bridge to quality
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-3474 · Cited by 1,783
Evidence-based medicine : how to practice and teach EBM
Straus, S. E. (2005) · Cited by 1,367
Self-citationSicily statement on evidence-based practice
Dawes, M., Summerskill, W., Glasziou, P., Cartabellotta, A., Martin, J., Hopayian, K., Porzsolt, F., Burls, A., & Osborne, J. (2005) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/1472-6920-5-1 · Cited by 911
Self-citationThe Use of the Delphi and Other Consensus Group Methods in Medical Education Research: A Review
Humphrey-Murto, S., Varpio, L., Wood, T. J., Gonsalves, C., Ufholz, L.-A., Mascioli, K., Wang, C., & Foth, T. (2017) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001812 · Cited by 613
Melnyk, B. M., Gallagher‐Ford, L., Long, L. E., & Fineout‐Overholt, E. (2014) · Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing · doi:10.1111/wvn.12021 · Cited by 605
Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice
Haynes, R. B. (2002) · Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1136/ebm.7.2.36 · Cited by 586
Self-citation
Cited by
We Agree, Don’t We? The Delphi Method for Health Environments Research
Taylor, E. (2020) · HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal · doi:10.1177/1937586719887709 · Cited by 316
Artificial Intelligence in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review
Lee, J., Wu, A. S., Li, D., & Kulasegaram, K. (. (2021) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000004291 · Cited by 324
The Digital Health Competencies in Medical Education Framework
Car, J., Ong, Q. C., Erlikh Fox, T., Leightley, D., Kemp, S. J., Švab, I., Tsoi, K. K. F., Sam, A. H., Kent, F. M., Hertelendy, A. J., et al. (2025) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53131 · Cited by 155
Goniewicz, K., Goniewicz, M., Włoszczak-Szubzda, A., Burkle, F. M., Hertelendy, A. J., Al-Wathinani, A., Molloy, M. S., & Khorram-Manesh, A. (2021) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-021-10165-5 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Albarqouni, L., Hoffmann, T., Straus, S., Olsen, N. R., Young, T., Ilic, D., Shaneyfelt, T., Haynes, R. B., Guyatt, G., & Glasziou, P.
- Venue
- JAMA Network Open
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2018-06-22
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e180281
- ISSN
- 2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2809361269
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 46.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Core Competencies in Evidence-Based Practice for Health Professionals: Consensus Statement Based on a Systematic Review and Delphi Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0281
- The paper
- Albarqouni, L., Hoffmann, T., Straus, S., Olsen, N. R., Young, T., Ilic, D., Shaneyfelt, T., Haynes, R. B., Guyatt, G., & Glasziou, P. (2018). Core Competencies in Evidence-Based Practice for Health Professionals: Consensus Statement Based on a Systematic Review and Delphi Survey. JAMA Network Open. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0281
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.