Cited by 45Child Abuse and TraumaChild Welfare and AdoptionFamily Dynamics and Relationships

Association of youth age at exposure to household dysfunction with outcomes in early adulthood.

Open access
Andersen, Signe Hald·2021·JAMA Network Open

Abstract

Importance: The current focus on the association of negative experiences in early childhood with adverse outcomes later in life is based on limited empirical evidence. Objective: To evaluate whether age at exposure to negative experiences in childhood and adolescence is associated with outcomes in early adulthood. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used population data from administrative sources for all Danish individuals born between 1987 and 1995 who were living in Denmark at 19 years of age. Data were analyzed in July 2020. Exposures: Exposure to 6 household dysfunction items (HDIs) from birth to 17 years of age by age group. Age groups were as follows: 0 to 2 years (early childhood), 3 to 5 years (preschool), 6 to 12 years (mid-childhood), and 13 to 17 years (early adolescence). The 6 items were parents' unemployment, incarceration, mental disorders, death, and divorce and the child's foster care experiences. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mental disorders, low educational attainment, disconnection from education and the labor market, and criminal charges. A fixed-effects model was used to estimate the dose-response and age-specific associations between HDI exposure and the collated outcome measure. Results: The study sample included 605 344 individuals observed from birth to 19 years of age (mean [SD] birth year, 1991 [2.56] years; range, 1987-1995; 335 725 [55%] male). Overall, 278 115 individuals (45.94%) were exposed to 1 or more of the 6 HDIs from birth to 17 years of age. Exposure was most prevalent at 1 year of age (exposure rate, 11.3%), and parental unemployment was the most common HDI (15.5% observed in mid-childhood). The risk of experiencing the 4 outcomes was monotonically associated with the number of HDIs. For example, experiencing 1 HDI between birth and 17 years of age was associated with an increased risk of experiencing an adverse outcome by approximately 1.0 percentage point (β = 0.011; 95% CI, 0.010-0.012; P < .001). Similarly, the risk of experiencing adverse outcomes varied significantly in association with age at exposure. Exposure during early adolescence was more strongly associated with adverse outcomes than was exposure during early childhood (increased risk of 5.8 percentage points [β = 0.058; 95% CI, 0.052-0.063; P < .001] vs 1.0 [β = 0.010; 95% CI, 0.004-0.015; P = .001]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, exposure to negative experiences in early adolescence was more strongly associated with later adverse outcomes than was exposure at other points in childhood. Knowledge of age-specific associations is important information for policy makers who need to prioritize resources targeting disadvantaged children and youths.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.32769

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Effect sizes for adolescent exposures were nearly 2-fold those for exposures in middle childhood and more than 3-fold those for exposures earlier in life.

    “Effect sizes for adolescent exposures were nearly 2-fold those for exposures in middle childhood and more than 3-fold those for exposures earlier in life.”
  • Andersen identified a dose-response association between accumulation of ACEs and increased likelihood of experiencing disruption to the transition to adulthood.

    “Using this sibling comparison design, Andersen identified a dose-response association between accumulation of ACEs and increased likelihood of experiencing disruption to the transition to adulthood.”
  • Adversity exposures during adolescence (ages 13-17 years) had larger magnitude risk associations compared with adversities that occurred earlier in development.

    “Adversity exposures during adolescence (ages 13-17 years) had larger magnitude risk associations compared with adversities that occurred earlier in development.”
  • Andersen's results resonate with emerging research streams in both neuroscience and the social sciences to suggest that benefits of interventions in adolescence may be underappreciated.

    “Andersen's results 1 resonate with emerging research streams in both neuroscience and the social sciences to suggest that benefits of interventions in adolescence may be underappreciated.”
  • The register data analyzed by Andersen captured household dysfunction dimensions of ACEs but not abuse or neglect.

    “The register data analyzed by Andersen captured household dysfunction dimensions of ACEs but not abuse or neglect.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]Shonkoff JP Mobilizing science to revitalize early childhood policy. Issues Sci Technol. 2009; 26(1):79-85.
  2. [23]Pechtel P, Lyons-Ruth K, Anderson CM, Teicher MH Sensitive periods of amygdala development: the role of maltreatment in preadolescence. Neuroimage. 2014; 97: 236- 244. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.025 24736182 PMC4258391 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andersen, S. H.
Affiliations
Rockwool Foundation (DK)
Corresponding author
Andersen, Signe Hald
Venue
JAMA Network Open
Published
2021-01-07
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
e2032769
ISSN
2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3118692603
Cited by
45
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Rockwool Fonden
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
household dysfunction, age at exposure, early childhood adversity, parental unemployment, parental incarceration, parental mental illness, parental death, parental divorce, foster care, mental illness, educational attainment, criminal charges, early adulthood outcomes, dose-response relationship, developmental origins of health and disease
MeSH terms
Adverse Childhood Experiences, Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Child, Child, Preschool, Death, Denmark, Divorce, Family Characteristics, Female, Foster Home Care, Humans, Infant, Male, Risk Factors, Unemployment, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review