Cited by 120COVID-19 epidemiological studiesHealth disparities and outcomesCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Variation in COVID-19 mortality in the US by race and ethnicity and educational attainment

Open access
Feldman, Justin M., Bassett, Mary T.·2021·JAMA Network Open

Abstract

Importance: Racial and ethnic inequities in COVID-19 mortality have been well documented, but little prior research has assessed the combined roles of race and ethnicity and educational attainment. Objective: To measure inequality in COVID-19 mortality jointly by race and ethnicity and educational attainment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study analyzed data on COVID-19 mortality from the 50 US states and the District of Columbia for the full calendar year 2020. It included all persons in the United States aged 25 years or older and analyzed them in subgroups jointly stratified by age, sex, race and ethnicity, and educational attainment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Population-based cumulative mortality rates attributed to COVID-19.F. Results: Among 219.1 million adults aged 25 years or older (113.3 million women [51.7%]; mean [SD] age, 51.3 [16.8] years), 376 125 COVID-19 deaths were reported. Age-adjusted cumulative mortality rates per 100 000 ranged from 54.4 (95% CI, 49.8-59.0 per 100 000 population) among Asian women with some college to 699.0 (95% CI, 612.9-785.0 per 100 000 population) among Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander men with a high school degree or less. Racial and ethnic inequalities in COVID-19 mortality rates remained when comparing within educational attainment categories (median rate ratio reduction, 17% [IQR, 0%-25%] for education-stratified estimates vs unstratified, with non-Hispanic White individuals as the reference). If all groups had experienced the same mortality rates as college-educated non-Hispanic White individuals, there would have been 48% fewer COVID-19 deaths among adults aged 25 years or older overall, including 71% fewer deaths among racial and ethnic minority populations and 89% fewer deaths among racial and ethnic minority populations aged 25 to 64 years. Conclusions and Relevance: Public health research and practice should attend to the ways in which populations that share socioeconomic characteristics may still experience racial and ethnic inequity in the distribution of risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 exposure and infection fatality rates (eg, housing, occupation, and prior health status). This study suggests that a majority of deaths among racial and ethnic minority populations could have been averted had all groups experienced the same mortality rate as college-educated non-Hispanic White individuals, thus highlighting the importance of eliminating joint racial-socioeconomic health inequities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.35967

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [10]Ruggles S, Flood S, Goeken R,. IPUMS USA: Version 8.0 [dataset]. IPUMS. 2018;10:D010.
  2. [11]Klein RJ. Age Adjustment Using the 2000 Projected US Population. National Center for Health Statistics; 2001. 11676466
  3. [12]Cochrane WG. Sampling Techniques. 3rd ed. Wiley; 1991. Accessed September 23, 2021. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Sampling+Techniques%2C+3rd+Edition-p-9780471162407

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feldman, J. M., & Bassett, M. T.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Feldman, Justin M.
Venue
JAMA Network Open
Published
2021-11-23
Volume
4
Issue
11
Pages
e2135967
ISSN
2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3215441144
Cited by
120
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 34
FWCI
9.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
COVID-19 mortality, racial and ethnic disparities, educational attainment, health disparities, SARS-CoV-2, Asian Americans, Hispanic Americans, African Americans, socioeconomic status, United States adults, COVID-19 pandemic, health inequalities reduction, infection fatality rate
MeSH terms
Academic Success, COVID-19, Health Inequities, Ethnic and Racial Minorities, Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Minority Groups, United States, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review