Cited by 78Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

Use of Lipid-, Blood Pressure–, and Glucose-Lowering Pharmacotherapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Open access
Nelson, Adam J., O’Brien, Emily C., Kaltenbach, Lisa A., Green, Jennifer B., Lopes, Renato D., Morse, Caryn G., Al-Khalidi, Hussein R., Aroda, Vanita R. +13 more·2022·JAMA Network Open

Abstract

Importance: Based on contemporary estimates in the US, evidence-based therapies for cardiovascular risk reduction are generally underused among patients with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Objective: To determine the use of evidence-based cardiovascular preventive therapies in a broad US population with diabetes and ASCVD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter cohort study used health system-level aggregated data within the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network, including 12 health systems. Participants included patients with diabetes and established ASCVD (ie, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral artery disease) between January 1 and December 31, 2018. Data were analyzed from September 2020 until January 2021. Exposures: One or more health care encounters in 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patient characteristics by prescription of any of the following key evidence-based therapies: high-intensity statin, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2I) or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA). Results: The overall cohort included 324 706 patients, with a mean (SD) age of 68.1 (12.2) years and 144 169 (44.4%) women and 180 537 (55.6%) men. A total of 59 124 patients (18.2% ) were Black, and 41 470 patients (12.8%) were Latinx. Among 205 885 patients with specialized visit data from the prior year, 17 971 patients (8.7%) visited an endocrinologist, 54 330 patients (26.4%) visited a cardiologist, and 154 078 patients (74.8%) visited a primary care physician. Overall, 190 277 patients (58.6%) were prescribed a statin, but only 88 426 patients (26.8%) were prescribed a high-intensity statin; 147 762 patients (45.5%) were prescribed an ACEI or ARB, 12 724 patients (3.9%) were prescribed a GLP-1RA, and 8989 patients (2.8%) were prescribed an SGLT2I. Overall, 14 918 patients (4.6%) were prescribed all 3 classes of therapies, and 138 173 patients (42.6%) were prescribed none. Patients who were prescribed a high-intensity statin were more likely to be men (59.9% [95% CI, 59.6%-60.3%] of patients vs 55.6% [95% CI, 55.4%-55.8%] of patients), have coronary atherosclerotic disease (79.9% [95% CI, 79.7%-80.2%] of patients vs 73.0% [95% CI, 72.8%-73.3%] of patients) and more likely to have seen a cardiologist (40.0% [95% CI, 39.6%-40.4%] of patients vs 26.4% [95% CI, 26.2%-26.6%] of patients). Conclusions and Relevance: In this large cohort of US patients with diabetes and ASCVD, fewer than 1 in 20 patients were prescribed all 3 evidence-based therapies, defined as a high-intensity statin, either an ACEI or ARB, and either an SGLT2I and/or a GLP-1RA. These findings suggest that multifaceted interventions are needed to overcome barriers to the implementation of evidence-based therapies and facilitate their optimal use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48030

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cardiovascular risk factors are predicted to increase and only a minority of people with type 2 diabetes achieve recommended risk factor goals and are treated with guideline-recommended therapy.

    “Despite these encouraging opportunities to reduce morbidity and mortality, cardiovascular risk factors are predicted to increase and only a minority of people with type 2 diabetes achieve recommended risk factor goals and are treated with guideline-recommended therapy (7)(8)(9).”

    From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Discussion and Conclusions report that fewer than 1 in 20 US patients with type 2 diabetes and ASCVD received all three evidence-based therapies, supporting the claim about limited use of recommended treatment in that population. The paper does not report that cardiovascular risk factors are predicted to increase or establish how many patients achieve recommended risk-factor goals; its cohort also does not represent all people with type 2 diabetes. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Only a minority of people with type 2 diabetes achieve recommended risk factor goals and are treated with guideline-recommended therapy.

    “only a minority of people with type 2 diabetes achieve recommended risk factor goals and are treated with guideline-recommended therapy (7–9).”

    From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Conclusions report that fewer than 1 in 20 patients received all three evidence-based cardiovascular risk–mitigating therapies, supporting the treatment portion of the claim. The study concerns patients with both type 2 diabetes and ASCVD, not all people with type 2 diabetes. Its Results list risk-factor measurements but do not report the proportion achieving recommended risk-factor goals. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nelson, A. J., O’Brien, E. C., Kaltenbach, L. A., Green, J. B., Lopes, R. D., Morse, C. G., Al-Khalidi, H. R., Aroda, V. R., Cavender, M. A., Gaynor, T., Kirk, J. K., Lingvay, I., Magwire, M. L., McGuire, D. K., Pak, J., Pop-Busui, R., Richardson, C. R., Senyucel, C., Kelsey, M. D., Pagidipati, N. J., & Granger, C. B.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Boehringer Ingelheim (United States) (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Saint Luke's Health System (US)
  • Parkland Health & Hospital System (US)
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana
Corresponding author
Granger, Christopher B.
Venue
JAMA Network Open
Published
2022-02-17
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
e2148030
ISSN
2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4212978690
Cited by
78
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 7
FWCI
12.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • Edwards Lifesciences
  • CSL Behring
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
  • Intarcia Therapeutics
  • MannKind Corporation
  • Mylan
  • Verily Life Sciences
  • Diabetes Australia
  • Royal Australasian College of Physicians
  • Eisai
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Esperion Therapeutics
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092926, P30DK020572)
  • Duke Clinical Research Institute
  • Daiichi Sankyo Europe
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, high-intensity statins, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, lipid-lowering therapy, blood pressure-lowering therapy, glucose-lowering therapy, treatment underuse, health care utilization, primary care
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antihypertensive Agents, Hypolipidemic Agents, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, United States, Cohort Studies, Atherosclerosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review