Cited by 290Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Association of Brain DNA Methylation in SORL1,ABCA7,HLA-DRB5,SLC24A4, and BIN1 With Pathological Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease

Open access
Yu, Lei, Chibnik, Lori B., Srivastava, Gyan P., Pochet, Nathalie, Yang, Jingyun, Xu, Jishu, Kozubek, James, Obholzer, Nikolaus +5 more·2015·JAMA Neurology

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Recent large-scale genome-wide association studies have discovered several genetic variants associated with Alzheimer disease (AD); however, the extent to which DNA methylation in these AD loci contributes to the disease susceptibility remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of brain DNA methylation in 28 reported AD loci with AD pathologies. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Ongoing community-based clinical pathological cohort studies of aging and dementia (the Religious Orders Study and the Rush Memory and Aging Project) among 740 autopsied participants 66.0 to 108.3 years old. EXPOSURES: DNA methylation levels at individual CpG sites generated from dorsolateral prefrontal cortex tissue using a bead assay. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Pathological diagnosis of AD by National Institute on Aging-Reagan criteria following a standard postmortem examination. RESULTS: Overall, 447 participants (60.4%) met the criteria for pathological diagnosis of AD. Brain DNA methylation in SORL1, ABCA7, HLA-DRB5, SLC24A4, and BIN1 was associated with pathological AD. The association was robustly retained after replacing the binary trait of pathological AD with 2 quantitative and molecular specific hallmarks of AD, namely, Aβ load and paired helical filament tau tangle density. Furthermore, RNA expression of transcripts of SORL1 and ABCA7 was associated with paired helical filament tau tangle density, and the expression of BIN1 was associated with Aβ load. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Brain DNA methylation in multiple AD loci is associated with AD pathologies. The results provide further evidence that disruption of DNA methylation is involved in the pathological process of AD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.3049

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Targeted studies have revealed methylation alterations at additional loci associated with disease.

    “Targeted studies have revealed methylation alterations at additional loci associated with disease [195–197]”

    From Genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [196]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, L., Chibnik, L. B., Srivastava, G. P., Pochet, N., Yang, J., Xu, J., Kozubek, J., Obholzer, N., Leurgans, S. E., Schneider, J. A., Meissner, A., De Jager, P. L., & Bennett, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Program in Translational NeuroPsychiatric Genomics, Institute for the Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts4Program in Translational NeuroPsychiatric Genomics, Institute for the Neurosciences, Departme
Venue
JAMA Neurology
Published
2015-01-01
Volume
72
Issue
1
Pages
15
ISSN
2168-6149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2096223549
Cited by
290
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 2
FWCI
18.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG017917, R01AG36042, P30-AG 10161, K25AG041906, R01‐AG17917, R01 AG15819, R01-AG36836, R01AG036836, U01AG046152, R01AG036042, R01AG015819, P30AG010161, R01AG041797, RF1AG015819, U01‐AG46152, RF1AG036042)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, SORL1, ABCA7, HLA-DRB5, SLC24A4, BIN1, pathological diagnosis, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, gene expression, epigenetics, Religious Orders Study, Rush Memory and Aging Project
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Female, Humans, Male, Nuclear Proteins, Residence Characteristics, Cohort Studies, Antiporters, ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters, CpG Islands, DNA Methylation, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, LDL-Receptor Related Proteins, Membrane Transport Proteins, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Genetic Association Studies, HLA-DRB5 Chains

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review