Cited by 71Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative DiseasesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Cholinesterase Inhibitors for Treatment of Psychotic Symptoms in Alzheimer Disease and Parkinson Disease: A Meta-analysis

Open access
d’Angremont, Emile, Begemann, Marieke J. H., van Laar, Teus, Sommer, Iris E. C.·2023·JAMA Neurology

Abstract

Importance: Psychotic symptoms greatly increase the burden of disease for people with neurodegenerative disorders and their caregivers. Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) may be effective treatment for psychotic symptoms in these disorders. Previous trials only evaluated neuropsychiatric symptoms as a secondary and an overall outcome, potentially blurring the outcomes noted with ChEI use specifically for psychotic symptoms. Objective: To quantitatively assess the use of ChEIs for treatment of individual neuropsychiatric symptoms, specifically hallucinations and delusions, in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD), Parkinson disease (PD), and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Data Sources: A systematic search was performed in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and PsychInfo, without year restrictions. Additional eligible studies were retrieved from reference lists. The final search cutoff date was April 21, 2022. Study Selection: Studies were selected if they presented the results of placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials, including at least 1 donepezil, rivastigmine, or galantamine treatment arm in patients with AD, PD, or DLB; if they applied at least 1 neuropsychiatric measure including hallucinations and/or delusions; and if a full-text version of the study was available in the English language. Study selection was performed and checked by multiple reviewers. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Original research data were requested on eligible studies. A 2-stage meta-analysis was then performed, using random-effects models. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were followed for extracting data and assessing the data quality and validity. Data extraction was checked by a second reviewer. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were hallucinations and delusions; secondary outcomes included all other individual neuropsychiatric subdomains as well as the total neuropsychiatric score. Results: In total, 34 eligible randomized clinical trials were selected. Individual participant data on 6649 individuals (3830 [62.6%] women; mean [SD] age, 75.0 [8.2] years) were obtained from 17 trials (AD: n = 12; PD: n = 5; individual participant data were not available for DLB). An association with ChEI treatment was shown in the AD subgroup for delusions (−0.08; 95% CI, −0.14 to −0.03; P = .006) and hallucinations (−0.09; 95% CI, −0.14 to −0.04; P = .003) and in the PD subgroup for delusions (−0.14; 95% CI, −0.26 to −0.01; P = .04) and hallucinations (−0.08, 95% CI −0.13 to −0.03; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this individual participant data meta-analysis suggest that ChEI treatment improves psychotic symptoms in patients with AD and PD with small effect sizes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.1835

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]16. Ballard C, Piggott M, Johnson M, et al. Delusions associated with elevated muscarinic binding in dementia with Lewy bodies. Ann Neurol. 2000;48(6):868-876. doi:10.1002/1531-8249 (200012)48:6<868::AID-ANA7>3.0.CO;2-0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
d’Angremont, E., Begemann, M. J. H., van Laar, T., & Sommer, I. E. C.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
Corresponding author
d’Angremont, Emile
Venue
JAMA Neurology
Published
2023-08-01
Volume
80
Issue
8
Pages
813
ISSN
2168-6149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4382010783
Cited by
71
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
cholinesterase inhibitors, psychotic symptoms, hallucinations, delusions, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine, neuropsychiatric symptoms, treatment effect heterogeneity, caregiver burden
MeSH terms
Rivastigmine, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Cholinesterase Inhibitors, Female, Hallucinations, Humans, Male, Parkinson Disease, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review