Cited by 686Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Assessment of Resistance Mechanisms and Clinical Implications in Patients With EGFR T790M–Positive Lung Cancer and Acquired Resistance to Osimertinib

Open access
Oxnard, Geoffrey R., Hu, Yuebi, Mileham, Kathryn F., Husain, Hatim, Costa, Daniel B., Tracy, Philip, Feeney, Nora, Sholl, Lynette M. +7 more·2018·JAMA Oncology

Abstract

Importance: Osimertinib mesylate is used globally to treat EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance mediated by the EGFR T790M mutation. Acquired resistance to osimertinib is a growing clinical challenge that is poorly understood. Objective: To understand the molecular mechanisms of acquired resistance to osimertinib and their clinical behavior. Design, Setting, and Participants: Patients with advanced NSCLC who received osimertinib for T790M-positive acquired resistance to prior EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor were identified from a multi-institutional cohort (n = 143) and a confirmatory trial cohort (NCT01802632) (n = 110). Next-generation sequencing of tumor biopsies after osimertinib resistance was performed. Genotyping of plasma cell-free DNA was studied as an orthogonal approach, including serial plasma samples when available. The study and analysis were finalized on November 9, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mechanisms of resistance and their association with time to treatment discontinuation on osimertinib. Results: Of the 143 patients evaluated, 41 (28 [68%] women) had tumor next-generation sequencing after acquired resistance to osimertinib. Among 13 patients (32%) with maintained T790M at the time of resistance, EGFR C797S was seen in 9 patients (22%). Among 28 individuals (68%) with loss of T790M, a range of competing resistance mechanisms was detected, including novel mechanisms such as acquired KRAS mutations and targetable gene fusions. Time to treatment discontinuation was shorter in patients with T790M loss (6.1 vs 15.2 months), suggesting emergence of pre-existing resistant clones; this finding was confirmed in a validation cohort of 110 patients with plasma cell-free DNA genotyping performed after osimertinib resistance. In studies of serial plasma levels of mutant EGFR, loss of T790M at resistance was associated with a smaller decrease in levels of the EGFR driver mutation after 1 to 3 weeks of therapy (100% vs 83% decrease; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: Acquired resistance to osimertinib mediated by loss of the T790M mutation is associated with early resistance and a range of competing resistance mechanisms. These data provide clinical evidence of the heterogeneity of resistance in advanced NSCLC and a need for clinical trial strategies that can overcome multiple concomitant resistance mechanisms or strategies for preventing such resistance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2969

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mechanisms of acquired resistance to osimertinib are more heterogeneous than those to first- and second-generation TKIs, including EGFR C797S, acquired KRAS, and targetable gene fusions.

    “mechanisms of acquired resistance to osimertinib are more heterogeneous, and include EGFR C797S, acquired KRAS, and targetable gene fusions.”

    From Afatinib for the treatment of <i>EGFR</i> mutation-positive NSCLC: A review of clinical findings (2020) · cites this paper as [96]

    The Abstract Results and Discussion describe heterogeneous resistance to osimertinib, including EGFR C797S, acquired KRAS mutations, and gene fusions. The paper does not establish the claim’s added comparison that these mechanisms are more heterogeneous than resistance to first- and second-generation TKIs. No page numbers are supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • EGFR exon 20 tertiary mutations, MET amplification, HER2 amplification, small cell transformation, and EMT are possible drivers of resistance.

    “Reports on individual cases or clinical series have demonstrated that EGFR exon 20 tertiary mutations, including C797S[5–7], MET amplification[8], HER2 amplification[9], small cell transformation[10], and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) [10, 11] are possible drivers of resistance.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [3]Oxnard GR, Ramalingam SS, Ahn M-J, Preliminary results of TATTON, a multi-arm phase Ib trial of AZD9291 combined with MEDI4736, AZD6094 or selumetinib in EGFR-mutant lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2015; 33(15_suppl): 2509– 2509.26150443
  2. [9]Yu HA, Tian SK, Drilon AE, Acquired Resistance of EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancer to a T790M-Specific EGFR Inhibitor: Emergence of a Third Mutation (C797S) in the EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Domain. JAMA Oncol 2015; 1(7): 982– 984. 26181354 PMC4665629
  3. [16]Kehl K, Gong YUT, Kalyani PM, Oxnard G, Blumenthal GM. Time to Treatment Discontinuation (TTD) as a pragmatic endpoint in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC): A pooled analysis of 8 trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2018; Abstract Number: 9064. In press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oxnard, G. R., Hu, Y., Mileham, K. F., Husain, H., Costa, D. B., Tracy, P., Feeney, N., Sholl, L. M., Dahlberg, S. E., Redig, A. J., Kwiatkowski, D. J., Rabin, M. S., Paweletz, C. P., Thress, K. S., & Jänne, P. A.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Carolinas Healthcare System (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
  • Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
Corresponding author
Oxnard, Geoffrey R.
Venue
JAMA Oncology
Published
2018-11-01
Volume
4
Issue
11
Pages
1527
ISSN
2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2885289995
Cited by
686
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 129 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 9
FWCI
61.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA135257)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
osimertinib resistance, acquired drug resistance, C797S mutation, KRAS mutation, gene fusion, plasma cell-free DNA, liquid biopsy, time to treatment discontinuation, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, non-small cell lung cancer
MeSH terms
Acrylamides, Aniline Compounds, Female, Humans, Indoles, Lung Neoplasms, Pyrimidines, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review