CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 276Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Treatment of Complicated Grief in Elderly Persons: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Shear, M. Katherine, Wang, Yuanjia, Skritskaya, Natalia, Duan, Naihua, Mauro, Christine, Ghesquiere, Angela·2014·JAMA Psychiatry
DOI 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1242PMC PMC5705174
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Complicated grief (CG) is a debilitating condition, most prevalent in elderly persons. However, to our knowledge, no full-scale randomized clinical trial has studied CG in this population. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether complicated grief treatment (CGT) produces greater improvement in CG and depressive symptoms than grief-focused interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized clinical trial enrolling 151 individuals 50 years or older (mean [SD] age, 66.1 [8.9] years) scoring at least 30 on the Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG). Participants were recruited from the New York metropolitan area from August 20, 2008, through January 7, 2013, and randomized to receive CGT or IPT. The main outcome was assessed at 20 weeks after baseline, with interim measures collected at 8, 12, and 16 weeks after baseline. INTERVENTIONS: Sixteen sessions of CGT (n = 74) or IPT (n = 77) delivered approximately weekly. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Rate of treatment response, defined as a rating from an independent evaluator of much or very much improved on the Improvement subscale of the Clinical Global Impression Scale. RESULTS: Both treatments produced improvement in CG symptoms. Response rate for CGT (52 individuals [70.5%]) was more than twice that for IPT (24 [32.0%]) (relative risk, 2.20 [95% CI, 1.51-3.22]; P < .001), with the number needed to treat at 2.56. Secondary analyses of CG severity and CG symptom and impairment questionnaire measures confirmed that CGT conferred a significantly greater change in illness severity (22 individuals [35.2%] in the CGT group vs 41 [64.1%] in the IPT group were still at least moderately ill [P = .001]), rate of CG symptom reduction (1.05 ICG points per week for CGT vs 0.75 points per week for IPT [t633 = 3.85; P < .001]), and the rate of improvement in CG impairment (0.63 work and Social Adjustment Scale points per week with CGT and 0.39 points per week with IPT [t503 = 2.87; P = .004]). Results were not moderated by participant age. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Complicated grief treatment produced clinically and statistically significantly greater response rates for CG symptoms than a proven efficacious treatment for depression (IPT). Results strongly support the need for physicians and other health care providers to distinguish CG from depression. Given the growing elderly population, the high prevalence of bereavement in aging individuals, and the marked physical and psychological impact of CG, clinicians need to know how to treat CG in older adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01244295.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1242

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]Rosengren DB Building Motivational Interviewing Skills: A Practicioner Workbook New York, NY Guilford Press 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 276

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Shear, M. K., Wang, Y., Skritskaya, N., Duan, N., Mauro, C., & Ghesquiere, A.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • City University of New York (US)
ORCID
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
2014-11-01
Volume
71
Issue
11
Pages
1287
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1242
PMC
PMC5705174
OpenAlex
W2100507918
Cited by
276
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 15
FWCI
25.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH070741)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
complicated grief, older adults, bereavement, depressive symptoms, treatment response, grief severity, psychotherapy comparison, Inventory of Complicated Grief, work and social adjustment, number needed to treat
MeSH terms
Affective Symptoms, Aged, Aging, Depression, Female, Grief, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review