Cited by 17Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatment

Heterogeneity Within and Between Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Challenge or Opportunity?

Ameis, Stephanie H.·2017·JAMA Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2508

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ameis, S. H.
Affiliations
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Corresponding author
Ameis, Stephanie H.
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2017-11-01
Volume
74
Issue
11
Pages
1093
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2753074621
Cited by
17
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, diagnostic heterogeneity, comorbidities, differential diagnosis
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Humans, White Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review