Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,301

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

·2006·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
DOI 10.1002/(issn)1099-1166
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

All groups comprising patients with severe dementia had caregivers who escorted the patients at the time of the consultation; compared to the other groups, the proportion of family members living with the patient was significantly higher. This means that the role of family members significantly encourages consultation behavior for those in the severe group. More than 80% of the patients in groups with severe dementia had a family doctor. Providing support before specialist medical care in cooperation with the family doctor is essential. The following three background factors contribute toward dementia not becoming apparent: non-existence, which indicates minimal social interaction or other opportunities for contact which would make one aware of the condition; connection failure, which means that families had difficulty in connecting with the consultation despite having trouble in their daily lives due to dementia.; and evaluation failure, which means that families did not feel that dementia was a problem that they needed to seek a consultation for. Even when patients were being adequately medically treated, the family exhibited a further need to understand the patient’s condition and sought advice on how to manage it. Therefore, expanding family counseling services is crucial to meet the diverse needs of families with members who have dementia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/(issn)1099-1166

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-03-13
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
DOI
10.1002/(issn)1099-1166
OpenAlex
W4254105891
Cited by
1,301
References
0
Type
paratext
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.