Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analysis of the short wavelength-sensitive (?blue?) cone mosaic in the primate retina: Comparison of New World and Old World monkeys

·1999
DOI 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19990329)406:1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine the role of the olivocochlear system in auditory processing by examining the long-term effects of cochlear de-efferentation on auditory nerve response properties in adult chinchillas. Spontaneous rates, response thresholds, tuning curves, discharge rate-level functions, and adaptation of single auditory nerve fibers were measured in chinchillas with complete cochlear de-efferentation produced by sectioning the olivocochlear bundle in the internal auditory meatus. De-efferentation was verified as successful on the basis of acetylcholinesterase staining of surface preparations of the organ of Corti. Following chronic de-efferentation, there was a striking decrease in spontaneous rate, consistent with earlier observations in cats. In addition, the present study shows that complete de-efferentation results in: (1) increased driven discharge rates and decreased dynamic range of discharge rate-level functions, (2) larger onset-to-steady state ratio of discharge rate at moderate intensities, and (3) a hypersensitive tail of the tuning curve. These effects, largely confined to neurons that were most sensitive to frequencies between 2-8 kHz, indicate that the cochlear efferent system is important in maintaining normal function (e.g., frequency and intensity selectivity) of the auditory periphery by modulating auditory nerve fiber response properties.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19990329)406:1<1::aid-cne1>3.0.co;2-1

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 74

  1. Ahnelt, 1994, J Comp Neurol, 343, 406, 10.1002/cne.903430306 · DOI
  2. Ahnelt, 1987, J Comp Neurol, 255, 18, 10.1002/cne.902550103 · DOI
  3. Ahnelt, 1990, J Comp Neurol, 293, 39, 10.1002/cne.902930104 · DOI
  4. Ahnelt, 1995, Visual Neurosci, 12, 793, 10.1017/S0952523800009366 · DOI
  5. Bowmaker, 1985, Vision Res, 25, 1937, 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90018-5 · DOI
  6. Bowmaker, 1991, J Exp Biol, 156, 1, 10.1242/jeb.156.1.1 · DOI
  7. Boycott, 1991, Eur J Neurosci, 3, 1069, 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1991.tb00043.x · DOI
  8. Bumsted, 1997, J Comp Neurol, 378, 117, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19970203)378:1<117::AID-CNE7>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI
  9. Chan, 1998, J Comp Neurol, 393, 196, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19980406)393:2<196::AID-CNE5>3.0.CO;2-Y · DOI
  10. Cook, 1996, Visual Neurosci, 13, 15, 10.1017/S0952523800007094 · DOI
  11. Curcio, 1987, Science, 236, 579, 10.1126/science.3576186 · DOI
  12. Curcio, 1991, J Comp Neurol, 312, 610, 10.1002/cne.903120411 · DOI
  13. Dacey, 1994, Nature, 367, 731, 10.1038/367731a0 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Dacey, 1992, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 89, 9666, 10.1073/pnas.89.20.9666 · DOI
  15. Dacey, 1996, Science, 271, 656, 10.1126/science.271.5249.656 · DOI · Paper page
  16. De Monasterio, 1981, Science, 213, 1278, 10.1126/science.7268439 · DOI
  17. Deegan, 1996, Am J Primatol, 40, 55, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1996)40:1<55::AID-AJP4>3.0.CO;2-# · DOI
  18. Drasdo, 1974, Br J Ophthalmol, 58, 709, 10.1136/bjo.58.8.709 · DOI
  19. Famiglietti, 1995, Visual Neurosci, 12, 1151, 10.1017/S0952523800006799 · DOI
  20. Ghosh, 1997, J Comp Neurol, 379, 211, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19970310)379:2<211::AID-CNE4>3.0.CO;2-6 · DOI
  21. Goodchild, 1996a, Visual Neurosci, 13, 833, 10.1017/S0952523800009093 · DOI
  22. Goodchild, 1996b, J Comp Neurol, 366, 55, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19960226)366:1<55::AID-CNE5>3.0.CO;2-J · DOI
  23. Halasz, 1984, Proc R Microsc Soc, 19, 312
  24. 1988. Antibodies: a laboratory manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
  25. Hemmi, 1999, Visual Neurosci
  26. Hunt, 1995, Genomics, 27, 535, 10.1006/geno.1995.1088 · DOI
  27. Jacobs, 1984, Vision Res, 24, 1267, 10.1016/0042-6989(84)90181-0 · DOI
  28. Jacobs, 1993, Biol Rev, 68, 413, 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1993.tb00738.x · DOI
  29. Jacobs, 1996, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 93, 577, 10.1073/pnas.93.2.577 · DOI
  30. Jacobs, 1993a, Vision Res, 33, 1773, 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90168-V · DOI
  31. Jacobs, 1993b, Vision Res, 33, 269, 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90083-9 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Jacobs, 1996, Nature, 382, 156, 10.1038/382156a0 · DOI
  33. Juliusson, 1994, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 35, 811
  34. Kalloniatis, 1991, J Opthalmol Soc Am A, 8, 1818, 10.1364/JOSAA.8.001818 · DOI
  35. Kouyama, 1992, J Neurosci, 12, 1233, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-04-01233.1992 · DOI
  36. Kouyama, 1997, Visual Neurosci, 14, 159, 10.1017/S0952523800008841 · DOI
  37. Kryger, 1998, Visual Neurosci, 15, 685, 10.1017/S0952523898154081 · DOI
  38. Lerea, 1989, Neuron, 3, 367, 10.1016/0896-6273(89)90261-4 · DOI
  39. Long, 1983, J Comp Neurol, 221, 329, 10.1002/cne.902210308 · DOI
  40. Marc, 1977, Science, 196, 454, 10.1126/science.403607 · DOI
  41. Mariani, 1984, Nature, 308, 184, 10.1038/308184a0 · DOI
  42. Martin, 1997, Eur J Neurosci, 9, 1536, 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1997.tb01509.x · DOI
  43. Müller, 1989, J Comp Neurol, 282, 581, 10.1002/cne.902820409 · DOI
  44. Müller, 1989, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 30, 530
  45. Nathans, 1992, Annu Rev Genet, 26, 403, 10.1146/annurev.ge.26.120192.002155 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Packer, 1989, J Comp Neurol, 288, 165, 10.1002/cne.902880113 · DOI
  47. Packer, 1996, J Neurosci, 16, 2251, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-07-02251.1996 · DOI
  48. Peichl, 1998, Eur J Neurosci, 10, 2586, 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1998.00265.x · DOI
  49. Perry, 1985, Vision Res, 25, 1795, 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90004-5 · DOI
  50. Raymond, 1995, J Comp Neurol, 359, 537, 10.1002/cne.903590403 · DOI
  51. Rodieck, 1991, Visual Neurosci, 6, 95, 10.1017/S095252380001049X · DOI
  52. Shapiro, 1985, J Stat Assoc Am, 80, 803, 10.1080/01621459.1985.10478185 · DOI
  53. Shyue, 1995, Science, 269, 1265, 10.1126/science.7652574 · DOI
  54. Silveira, 1999, Visual Neurosci
  55. Szél, 1988, J Comp Neurol, 273, 593, 10.1002/cne.902730413 · DOI
  56. Szél, 1994, Cell Tissue Res, 276, 143, 10.1007/BF00354793 · DOI
  57. Szél, 1996, Microsc Res Tech, 35, 445, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(19961215)35:6<445::AID-JEMT4>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI
  58. Tovée, 1992, Vision Res, 32, 867, 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90029-I · DOI
  59. Travis, 1988, Vision Res, 28, 481, 10.1016/0042-6989(88)90170-8 · DOI
  60. Troilo, 1993, Vision Res, 33, 1301, 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90038-X · DOI
  61. Wang, 1992, Neuron, 9, 429, 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90181-C · DOI · Paper page
  62. Wässle, 1978, Proc R Soc London B Biol Sci, 200, 441, 10.1098/rspb.1978.0026 · DOI
  63. Wässle, 1989, Nature, 341, 643, 10.1038/341643a0 · DOI
  64. Wikler, 1990, J Neurosci, 10, 3390, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.10-10-03390.1990 · DOI
  65. Wikler, 1991, Nature, 351, 397, 10.1038/351397a0 · DOI
  66. Wikler, 1996, Persp Dev Neurobiol, 3, 161
  67. Wikler, 1990, J Comp Neurol, 297, 499, 10.1002/cne.902970404 · DOI
  68. Wikler, 1997, J Comp Neurol, 377, 500, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19970127)377:4<500::AID-CNE2>3.0.CO;2-6 · DOI
  69. Wilder, 1996, Visual Neurosci, 13, 335, 10.1017/S0952523800007586 · DOI
  70. Williams, 1981a, Vision Res, 21, 1341, 10.1016/0042-6989(81)90241-8 · DOI
  71. Williams, 1981b, Vision Res, 21, 1357, 10.1016/0042-6989(81)90242-X · DOI
  72. Williams, 1991, Visual Neurosci, 6, 403, 10.1017/S0952523800006647 · DOI
  73. Yeh, 1995, J Neurosci, 15, 7892, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-12-07892.1995 · DOI
  74. Yokoyama, 1989, Mol Biol Evol, 6, 186

Cited by

See all 6

Metadata

Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-03-29
Volume
406
Issue
1
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 0021-9967
  • 1096-9861
DOI
10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19990329)406:1
References
7
Language
en
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 6000 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of the short wavelength-sensitive (?blue?) cone mosaic in the primate retina: Comparison of New World and Old World monkeys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19990329)406:1
The paper
Analysis of the short wavelength-sensitive (?blue?) cone mosaic in the primate retina: Comparison of New World and Old World monkeys. (1999). https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19990329)406%3A1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.