Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 29

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cationic Ring-Opening Polymerization(CROP) major mechanistic phenomena

Penczek, Stanislaw·2000·Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry

Abstract

Lipase-catalyzed ring-opening polymerization of 10-fluorodecan-9-olide (1a), 11-fluoroundecan-10-olide (1b), 12-fluorododecan-11-olide (1c) and 14-fluorotetradecan-13-olide (1d) gave optically active products with Mw of 3.000 to 8.000, while 10-fluoroundecan-11-olide (3a) gave an optically inactive polymer with Mw = 11.000. On the other hand, Candida antarctica lipase-catalyzed polymerization of 10- to 14-membered ω-fluoro-(ω-1)-hydroxyalcanoic acids gave optically inactive oligomers with Mw of 3.000 to 11.000 in the presence of molecular sieves, while reactions without molecular sieves gave oligomers with lower molecular weight, but with small optical rotations. 9-Fluoro-10-hydroxydecanoic acid, on the other hand, gave an optically inactive polyester with Mw = 7400. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 38: 2004–2012, 2000

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/(sici)1099-0518(20000601)38:11<1919::aid-pola10>3.0.co;2-w

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 29

Metadata

Authors
Penczek, S.
Venue
Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry
Published
2000
References
10

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cationic Ring-Opening Polymerization(CROP) major mechanistic phenomena. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/(sici)1099-0518(20000601)38:11
The paper
Penczek, S. (2000). Cationic Ring-Opening Polymerization(CROP) major mechanistic phenomena. Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0518(20000601)38%3A11

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.