Cited by 229Glioma Diagnosis and TreatmentCancer Cells and MetastasisOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment

Establishment, maintenance and in vitro and in vivo applications of primary human glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) xenograft models for translational biology studies and drug discovery

Open access
Carlson, Brett L., Pokorny, Jenny L., Schroeder, Mark A., Sarkaria, Jann N.·2011·Current Protocols in Pharmacology

Abstract

Development of clinically relevant tumor model systems for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is important for advancement of basic and translational biology. One model that has gained wide acceptance in the neuro-oncology community is the primary xenograft model. This model entails the engraftment of patient tumor specimens into the flank of nude mice and subsequent serial passage of these tumors in the flank of mice. These tumors are then used to establish short-term explant cultures or intracranial xenografts. This unit describes detailed procedures for establishment, maintenance, and utilization of a primary GBM xenograft panel for the purpose of using them as tumor models for basic or translational studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/0471141755.ph1416s52

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carlson, B. L., Pokorny, J. L., Schroeder, M. A., & Sarkaria, J. N.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
Current Protocols in Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
Unit 14.16-Unit 14.16
ISSN
  • 1934-8282 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-8290
OpenAlex
W1544655463
Cited by
227
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Protocols in Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA127716, CA108961, P50CA108961)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Keywords
glioblastoma, human tumor xenografts, nude mice, serial passage, intracranial xenograft, explant culture, drug discovery, translational oncology, tumor model establishment
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Glioblastoma, Humans, Mice, Nude, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Mice, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review