Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 316

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Models of Nociception: Hot‐Plate, Tail‐Flick, and Formalin Tests in Rodents

Bannon, Anthony W., Malmberg, Annika B.·2007·Current Protocols in Neuroscience

Abstract

Experimental models of pain include tests of response thesholds to high intensity stimuli (acute pain tests) and changes in spontaneous or evoked behavioral responses in animals with peripheral injury or inflammation (persistent pain models). Acute thermal pain is modeled by the hot‐plate and tail‐flick test, while persistent pain can be modeled by the formalin test. This unit presents protocols for all three of these tests, including preparation of animals (rats or mice), administration of a compound being tested for its analgesic properties and data collection. Curr. Protoc. Neurosci. 41:8.9.1‐8.9.16. © 2007 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/0471142301.ns0809s41

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 316

Metadata

Authors
Bannon, A. W., & Malmberg, A. B.
Venue
Current Protocols in Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-10
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
Unit 8.9-Unit 8.9
ISSN
  • 1934-8576 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-8584
OpenAlex
W2132187713
Cited by
316
References
16
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Models of Nociception: Hot‐Plate, Tail‐Flick, and Formalin Tests in Rodents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/0471142301.ns0809s41
The paper
Bannon, A. W., & Malmberg, A. B. (2007). Models of Nociception: Hot‐Plate, Tail‐Flick, and Formalin Tests in Rodents. Current Protocols in Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142301.ns0809s41

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.