CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 171Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumTreatment of Major DepressionPregnancy and Medication Impact

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 97 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antidepressant treatment for postnatal depression

Open access
Molyneaux, Emma, Howard, Louise M, McGeown, Helen R, Karia, Amar M, Trevillion, Kylee·2014·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002018.pub2PMC PMC10589908
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Depression is one of the most common morbidities of the postnatal period. It has been associated with adverse outcomes for women, children, the wider family and society as a whole. Treatment is with psychosocial interventions or antidepressant medication, or both. The aim of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of different antidepressants and to compare their effectiveness with placebo, treatment as usual or other forms of treatment. This is an update of a review last published in 2014. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of antidepressant drugs in comparison with any other treatment (psychological, psychosocial, or pharmacological), placebo, or treatment as usual for postnatal depression. SEARCH METHODS: We searched Cochrane Common Mental Disorders's Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO in May 2020. We also searched international trials registries and contacted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of women with depression during the first 12 months postpartum that compared antidepressant treatment (alone or in combination with another treatment) with any other treatment, placebo or treatment as usual. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data from the study reports. We requested missing information from study authors wherever possible. We sought data to allow an intention-to-treat analysis. Where we identified sufficient comparable studies we pooled data and conducted random-effects meta-analyses. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 11 RCTs (1016 women), the majority of which were from English-speaking, high-income countries; two were from middle-income countries. Women were recruited from a mix of community-based, primary care, maternity and outpatient settings. Most studies used selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), with treatment duration ranging from 4 to 12 weeks. Meta-analysis showed that there may be a benefit of SSRIs over placebo in response (55% versus 43%; pooled risk ratio (RR) 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97 to 1.66); remission (42% versus 27%; RR 1.54, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.41); and reduced depressive symptoms (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.30, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.05; 4 studies, 251 women), at 5 to 12 weeks' follow-up. We were unable to conduct meta-analysis for adverse events due to variation in the reporting of this between studies. There was no evidence of a difference between acceptability of SSRI and placebo (27% versus 27%; RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.64; 4 studies; 233 women). The certainty of all the evidence for SSRIs was low or very low due to the small number of included studies and a number of potential sources of bias, including high rates of attrition. There was insufficient evidence to assess the efficacy of SSRIs compared with other classes of antidepressants and of antidepressants compared with other pharmacological interventions, complementary medicines, psychological and psychosocial interventions or treatment as usual. A substantial proportion of women experienced adverse effects but there was no evidence of differences in the number of adverse effects between treatment groups in any of the studies. Data on effects on children, including breastfed infants, parenting, and the wider family were limited, although no adverse effects were noted. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There remains limited evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of antidepressants in the management of postnatal depression, particularly for those with more severe depression. We found low-certainty evidence that SSRI antidepressants may be more effective in treating postnatal depression than placebo as measured by response and remission rates. However, the low certainty of the evidence suggests that further research is very likely to have an important impact on our effect estimate. There is a continued imperative to better understand whether, and for whom, antidepressants or other treatments are more effective for postnatal depression, and whether some antidepressants are more effective or better tolerated than others. In clinical practice, the findings of this review need to be contextualised by the extensive broader literature on antidepressants in the general population and perinatal clinical guidance, to inform an individualised risk-benefit clinical decision. Future RCTs should focus on larger samples, longer follow-up, comparisons with alternative treatment modalities and inclusion of child and parenting outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd002018.pub2

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Warner R Appleby L Whitton A Faragher B A controlled study of fluoxetine and cognitive behavioural counselling in the treatment of post-natal depression. Proceedings of the Royal College of Psychiatrists Winter Meeting; 1997 Jan 21-24; Cardiff, UK
  2. Howard, 2011, The RESPOND trial: a randomized evaluation of antidepressants and support for women with postnatal depression, Archives of Women's Mental Health, 14
  3. Heath AC Yonkers KA Rush AJ Paroxetine in the treatment of postpartum depression. Proceedings of the 153rd Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association; 2000 May 13-8; Chicago, IL
  4. Heath AC Yonkers KA Rush AJ Paroxetine in the treatment of postpartum depression. Proceedings of the 155th Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association; 2002 May 18-23; Philadelphia, PA
  5. Yu, 2006, The therapeutic effects of paroxetine addition of psychological intervention on post-partum depression, Progress in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 15, 289
  6. Zhao, 2006, Study on postpartum depression treated with combination of fluoxetine and Chaihu Shugan powder, Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 33, 586
  7. Wisner, 2014, Should estradiol be prescribed for postpartum depression? [conference abstract], Biological Psychiatry, 9, 299S
  8. American Psychiatric Association, 2013, DSM 5
  9. Bayley, 2006, Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development® 3rd Edition (Bayley-III®)
  10. Centre for Research and Dissemination, 2009, Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking systematic reviews in healthcare
  11. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2007, Antenatal and Postnatal Mental Health: Clinical Management and Service Guidance. CG45, 45
  12. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager (RevMan) 2012
  13. Wechsler, 1974, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Revised
  14. World Health Organization, 1992, The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders
  15. World Health Organization, 2004, ICD-10: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 171

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Molyneaux, E., Howard, L. M., McGeown, H. R., Karia, A. M., & Trevillion, K.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-09-11
Volume
2014
Issue
9
Pages
CD002018-CD002018
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
DOI
10.1002/14651858.cd002018.pub2
PMC
PMC10589908
OpenAlex
W3023792194
Cited by
171
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR-RP-R3-12-011)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Keywords
postpartum depression, antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, mirtazapine, nortriptyline, fluoxetine, sertraline, placebo comparison, remission, depressive symptoms, adverse effects, drug safety, treatment effectiveness, psychosocial interventions, postpartum period, maternal mental health, child outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Clinical Trials as Topic, Female, Fluoxetine, Humans, Nortriptyline, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Paroxetine, Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation, Depression, Postpartum, Sertraline

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review