Cited by 83Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPregnancy and Medication ImpactTreatment of Major Depression

Women’s Views and Experiences of Antidepressants as a Treatment for Postnatal Depression: A Qualitative Study

Turner, K. M, Sharp, D., Folkes, L., Chew-Graham, C.·2008·Family Practice

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antidepressants are frequently prescribed by GPs for postnatal depression (PND). Patients, however, may be reluctant to take medication and have concerns that result in poor treatment adherence. Few studies have explored women's views and experiences of antidepressants as a treatment for PND. GPs need to understand women's views and experiences if they are to address their concerns and improve treatment adherence. OBJECTIVE: To explore women's views and experiences of antidepressants as a treatment for PND. METHODS: In-depth interviews with 27 women in three UK cities who had been diagnosed with PND and taken part in a randomized controlled trial. During the trial, participants could receive antidepressants and/or non-directive counselling. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Most participants stated that they had held negative views towards antidepressants at the time of randomization. Some participants reported that, over the course of their illness, through time and contact with others, including health professionals, their views towards antidepressants had changed and that they had gone on to take medication. Most interviewees who had taken antidepressants reported benefits, although some remained concerned about taking medication. CONCLUSION: Women's views of antidepressants can change in response to their treatment options and experiences, the views of friends and relatives and their contact with health professionals. GPs should assess women's concerns about antidepressants prior to prescribing them for PND and should provide regular follow-up for women on medication. This should lead to greater treatment adherence and thus earlier resolution of symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/fampra/cmn056

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Coding by consensus is most consistently used as a measure of reliability in qualitative data analysis in the mental health services area.

    ““Coding by consensus” in this way by regularly meeting to discuss procedures for assigning codes to segments of data and resolving differences in coding procedures is most consistently used as a measure of reliability in qualitative data analysis in the mental health services area [52,53,54].”
  • Many women do not receive treatment for postpartum depression for various reasons, including a lack of trust in the mental health system, fear and stigma associated with taking medications, guilt, and concerns about the effects of medications on breastfeeding.

    “Yet, many women do not receive treatment for various reasons, including a lack of trust in the mental health system, fear and stigma associated with taking medications, guilt, and concerns about the effects of medications on breastfeeding [13, 14].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turner, K. M., Sharp, D., Folkes, L., & Chew-Graham, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Venue
Family Practice
Published
2008-12-01
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
450-455
ISSN
  • 0263-2136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2229
OpenAlex
W2111131859
Cited by
83
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Family Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
postpartum depression, antidepressants, medication adherence, medication concerns, patient experience, general practitioners, non-directive counseling
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Continuity of Patient Care, Counseling, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Women's Health, Patient Satisfaction, Depression, Postpartum, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review