CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 122Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSchizophrenia research and treatmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antipsychotic medications for cocaine dependence

Open access
Indave, Blanca I, Minozzi, Silvia, Pani, Pier Paolo, Amato, Laura·2016·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006306.pub3PMC PMC8750745
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cocaine dependence is a public health problem characterised by recidivism and a host of medical and psychosocial complications. Cocaine dependence remains a disorder for which no pharmacological treatment of proven efficacy exists. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and the acceptability of antipsychotic medications for cocaine dependence. SEARCH METHODS: This review is an update of a previous Cochrane review published in 2007. We searched up to 15 July 2015 in Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group Specialised Register (searched in CRSLive); the Cochrane Library (including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE)); PubMed; EMBASE; CINAHL and Web of Science. All searches included non-English language literature. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials with focus on the use of any antipsychotic medication for the treatment of cocaine dependence. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS: We included 14 studies (719 participants). The antipsychotic drugs studied were risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, lamotrigine, aripiprazol, haloperidol and reserpine. Comparing any antipsychotic drugs versus placebo, we found that antipsychotics reduced dropout: eight studies, 397 participants, risk ratio (RR) 0.75 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 0.97), moderate quality of evidence. We found no significant differences for any of the other primary outcomes considered: number of participants using cocaine during the treatment, two studies, 91 participants: RR 1.02 (95% CI 0.65 to 1.62); continuous abstinence, three studies, 139 participants: RR 1.30 (95% CI 0.73 to 2.32); side effects, six studies, 291 participants: RR 1.01 (95% CI 0.93 to 1.10); and craving, four studies, 240 participants: RR 0.13 (-1.08 to 1.35). For all of these comparisons we rated the quality of evidence as low.Comparisons of single drug versus placebo or versus another drug are conducted in few trials with small sample sizes, limiting the reliability of the results. Among these comparisons, only quetiapine seemed to outperform placebo in reducing cocaine use, measured by grams per week: mean difference (MD) -0.54 (95% CI -0.92 to -0.16), by US dollars spent per week: MD -53.80 (95% CI -97.85 to -9.75), and by craving: MD -1.23 (95% CI -2.19 to -0.27), but results came from one study with 60 participants.The major limitations of the studies were the high risk of attrition bias (40% of the included studies) and low quality of reporting, mainly for the risk of selection bias, performance and detection bias, that we rated as being at unclear risk for 75% to 80% of the studies. Furthermore, most of the included studies did not report results on important outcomes such as side effects, or use of cocaine during treatment and craving, which prevented the possibility of including them in statistical synthesis. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: At present, there is no evidence supporting the clinical use of antipsychotic medications in the treatment of cocaine dependence, although results come from only 14 trials, with small sample sizes and moderate to low quality of evidence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd006306.pub3

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

4 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 102 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Brown, 2009, A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of quetiapine in outpatients with bipolar disorder and cocaine dependence, Bipolar Disorders, 11, 25
  2. Landabaso, 2003, Olanzapina and cocaine consumption in methadone maintenance programs: new results, Psiquiatría Biológica, 10, 160
  3. Vazquez, 2009, Clinical trial on the use of olanzapine in reducing the consumption of cocaine in methadone maintenance programmes, Heroin Addiction and Related Clinical Problems, 11, 21
  4. Middleton L Lofwall M Nuzzo PA Walsh SL Safety of oral aripiprazole alone and in combination with intravenous cocaine in humans Proceedings of the 71st Annual Scientific Meeting of the College on Problems of Drug Dependence; Reno/Sparks, Nevada, USA 2009 102
  5. Nuzzo PA Lofwall MR Walsh SL Aripiprazole effects on cigarette smoking among cocaine users Proceedings of the 74th Annual Scientific Meeting of the College on Problems of Drug Dependence, Palm Springs, CA , Abstract 2012
  6. Rush, 2009, Aripiprazole as a pharmacotherapy for cocaine dependence, The American Journal on Addiction, 18, 326
  7. Beck, 1996, Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd edn
  8. Guy, 1976, Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology
  9. Karch, 1992, A Brief History of Cocaine, 2nd edition
  10. Sorensen, 1991, Preventing AIDS in Drug Abusers and their Sexual Partners

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 122

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Indave, B. I., Minozzi, S., Pani, P. P., & Amato, L.
Affiliations
  • European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (PT)
  • Lazio Regional Health Service; Department of Epidemiology; Via Cristoforo Colombo, 112 Rome Italy 00154
  • Health District 8 (ASL 8) Cagliari; Social-Health Division; Via Romagna 17 Cagliari Sardinia Italy 09128
ORCID
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-19
Volume
2016
Issue
6
Pages
CD006306-CD006306
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
DOI
10.1002/14651858.cd006306.pub3
PMC
PMC8750745
OpenAlex
W1507790507
Cited by
122
References
102
Citations by year
2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
cocaine dependence, antipsychotic drugs, pharmacotherapy, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, lamotrigine, aripiprazole, haloperidol, reserpine, cocaine abstinence, treatment discontinuation, craving, adverse effects, treatment acceptability, relapse, substance use disorders, placebo comparison, drug comparison, quality of evidence
MeSH terms
Aripiprazole, Quetiapine Fumarate, Olanzapine, Lamotrigine, Benzodiazepines, Haloperidol, Humans, Patient Dropouts, Reserpine, Antipsychotic Agents, Triazines, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Risperidone, Cocaine-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review