Cited by 698Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareHealth Policy Implementation SciencePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 204 of the 205 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals

Open access

Légaré, France, Adekpedjou, Rhéda, Stacey, Dawn, Turcotte, Stéphane, Kryworuchko, Jennifer, Graham, Ian D, Lyddiatt, Anne, Politi, Mary C, Thomson, Richard, Elwyn, Glyn, Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert·2018·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006732.pub4PMC PMC6513543

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is a process by which a healthcare choice is made by the patient, significant others, or both with one or more healthcare professionals. However, it has not yet been widely adopted in practice. This is the second update of this Cochrane review. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of interventions for increasing the use of SDM by healthcare professionals. We considered interventions targeting patients, interventions targeting healthcare professionals, and interventions targeting both. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and five other databases on 15 June 2017. We also searched two clinical trials registries and proceedings of relevant conferences. We checked reference lists and contacted study authors to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and non-randomized trials, controlled before-after studies and interrupted time series studies evaluating interventions for increasing the use of SDM in which the primary outcomes were evaluated using observer-based or patient-reported measures. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We included 87 studies (45,641 patients and 3113 healthcare professionals) conducted mainly in the USA, Germany, Canada and the Netherlands. Risk of bias was high or unclear for protection against contamination, low for differences in the baseline characteristics of patients, and unclear for other domains.Forty-four studies evaluated interventions targeting patients. They included decision aids, patient activation, question prompt lists and training for patients among others and were administered alone (single intervention) or in combination (multifaceted intervention). The certainty of the evidence was very low. It is uncertain if interventions targeting patients when compared with usual care increase SDM whether measured by observation (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.13 to 1.22; 4 studies; N = 424) or reported by patients (SMD 0.32, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.48; 9 studies; N = 1386; risk difference (RD) -0.09, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.01; 6 studies; N = 754), reduce decision regret (SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.19; 1 study; N = 212), improve physical (SMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.36; 1 study; N = 116) or mental health-related quality of life (QOL) (SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.46; 1 study; N = 116), affect consultation length (SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.58; 2 studies; N = 224) or cost (SMD 0.82, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.22; 1 study; N = 105).It is uncertain if interventions targeting patients when compared with interventions of the same type increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 0.88, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.37; 3 studies; N = 271) or reported by patients (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.24; 11 studies; N = 1906); (RD 0.03, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.08; 10 studies; N = 2272); affect consultation length (SMD -0.65, 95% CI -1.29 to -0.00; 1 study; N = 39) or costs. No data were reported for decision regret, physical or mental health-related QOL.Fifteen studies evaluated interventions targeting healthcare professionals. They included educational meetings, educational material, educational outreach visits and reminders among others. The certainty of evidence is very low. It is uncertain if these interventions when compared with usual care increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 0.70, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.19; 6 studies; N = 479) or reported by patients (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.20; 5 studies; N = 5772); (RD 0.01, 95%C: -0.03 to 0.06; 2 studies; N = 6303); reduce decision regret (SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.51; 1 study; N = 326), affect consultation length (SMD 0.51, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.81; 1 study, N = 175), cost (no data available) or physical health-related QOL (SMD 0.16, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.36; 1 study; N = 359). Mental health-related QOL may slightly improve (SMD 0.28, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.49; 1 study, N = 359; low-certainty evidence).It is uncertain if interventions targeting healthcare professionals compared to interventions of the same type increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD -0.30, 95% CI -1.19 to 0.59; 1 study; N = 20) or reported by patients (SMD 0.24, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.58; 2 studies; N = 1459) as the certainty of the evidence is very low. There was insufficient information to determine the effect on decision regret, physical or mental health-related QOL, consultation length or costs.Twenty-eight studies targeted both patients and healthcare professionals. The interventions used a combination of patient-mediated and healthcare professional directed interventions. Based on low certainty evidence, it is uncertain whether these interventions, when compared with usual care, increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 1.10, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.79; 6 studies; N = 1270) or reported by patients (SMD 0.13, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.28; 7 studies; N = 1479); (RD -0.01,

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd006732.pub4

Cites

204 of 204 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
The “Golden Age” of Probiotics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Observational Studies in Preterm Infants
Dermyshi, E., Wang, Y., Yan, C., Hong, W., Qiu, G., Gong, X., & Zhang, T. (2017) · Neonatology · doi:10.1159/000454668 · Cited by 24,586
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
Guyatt, G., Oxman, A. D., Akl, E. A., Kunz, R., Vist, G., Brozek, J., Norris, S., Falck-Ytter, Y., Glasziou, P., & deBeer, H. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026 · Cited by 10,681
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
Stacey, D., Légaré, F., Lewis, K., Barry, M. J., Bennett, C. L., Eden, K. B., Holmes-Rovner, M., Llewellyn-Thomas, H., Lyddiatt, A., Thomson, R., et al. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001431.pub5 · Cited by 6,685
Self-citation
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration
Higgins, J., Green, S. R., & Higgins, J. (2008) · Cited by 5,544
Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango)
Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. (1997) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00221-3 · Cited by 4,137 · cited 3×
“Briefly, SDM depends on knowing and understanding the best available evidence about the risks and benefits across all available options while ensuring that the patient’s values and preferences are taken into account (Charles 1997; Elwyn 1999; Towle 1999).”
Background
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials
Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & for the CONSORT Group* (2010) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232 · Cited by 3,824
Oral health of individuals aged 3-80 years in Jönköping, Sweden during 40 years (1973-2013). II. Review of clinical and radiographic findings.
Norderyd, O. M., Koch, G., Papias, A., Köhler, A. A., Helkimo, A. N., Brahm, C., Lindmark, U., Lindfors, N., Mattsson, A., Rolander, B., et al. (2015) · PubMed · Cited by 3,584
Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials
Campbell, M. K., Piaggio, G., Elbourne, D. R., Altman, D. G., & for the CONSORT Group (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e5661 · Cited by 3,510
Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies
Grimshaw, J., Thomas, R., MacLennan, G., Fraser, C., Ramsay, C., Vale, L., Whitty, P., Eccles, M., Matowe, L., Shirran, L., et al. (2004) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta8060 · Cited by 3,044

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 205 references

1 of the 205 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

Hermansen Kobulnicky, 2002, The behavioral impact of teaching patients to monitor side effects of chemotherapy: an intervention study
LeBlanc A Egginton J Inselman J Dick S Schuerman J Branda M Dissemination and Implementation of Evidence-Based Medicine in Primary Care Through The Use of Encounter Decision Aids: The ShareEBM Pragmatic Trial. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Oral communications 2017
Simmons M ‘If I could see on a piece of paper options for treatment that would just be insane’: Shared decision making in mental health. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Posters Sessions 2017
van Veenendaal H Voogdt-Pruis H Schuurman M Visserman E Oskam J Ubbink D Implementing shared decision-making (SDM) and time-out for breast cancer patients in six Dutch Hospitals. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Posters Sessions 2017
Adekpedjou R Stacey D Brière N Freitas A Garvelink M Turcotte S Improving the decision-making process with caregivers of elderly people about housing options: a cluster randomised trial. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Oral communications 2017
Dwinger S Gschwendtner K Müller N Bieber C Härter M Bergelt C Development and pilot testing of a face-to-face SDM coaching intervention for oncologists. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Oral communications 2017
Finderup J Dam Jensen JK Lomborg K Developing and pilot testing a shared decision-making intervention for dialysis choice. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Oral communications 2017
Henselmans H van Laarhoven HWM de Haes HCJM Tokat M Engelhardt EG van Maarschalkerweerd P Effect of a Skills Training for oncologists on shared decision making about palliative chemotherapy in simulated encounters. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Posters Sessions 2017
Lifford K Burton M Armitage F Collins K Reed M Wyld L Bridging the Age Gap trial of decision support interventions for older women with breast cancer: Preliminary process evaluation. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Posters Sessions 2017
Ludden T Taylor Y Kuhn L McWilliams A Dulin M Tapp H “Who Made the Decision Today?” Surveying asthma patients level of shared decision making in an RCT. ISDM2015. Sydney, Australia: Joint International Shared Decision-Making and International Society for Evidence-Based Health Care Conference 2015
Simmons L Meyer C Marques F Leavitt L Sepucha K Skills training for shared decision making: a randomized pilot study. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Oral communications 2017
Coulter A Engaging patients in their healthcare. How is the UK doing relative to other countries? Oxford: Picker Institute Europe 2006
Cochrane Effective Practice Organisation of Care (EPOC) What study designs should be included in an EPOC review? EPOC resources for review authors, 2017 Available at: http://epoc.cochrane.org/resources/epoc-resources-review-authors
Cochrane Effective Practice Organisation of Care (EPOC) Data collection form. EPOC Resources for review authors, 2017 Available at: http://epoc.cochrane.org/resources/epoc-resources-review-authors
Cochrane Effective Practice Organisation of Care (EPOC) Suggested risk of bias criteria for EPOC reviews. EPOC Resources for review authors, 2017 http://epoc.cochrane.org/resources/epoc-resources-review-authors
Cochrane Effective Practice Organisation of Care (EPOC) EPOC worksheets for preparing a Summary of Findings (SoF) table using GRADE. EPOC Resources for review authors, 2017 Available at: http://epoc.cochrane.org/resources/epoc-resources-review-authors
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2013, The Global Burden of Disease: Generating Evidence, Guiding Policy
Schünemann HJ Oxman AD Vist GE Higgins JPT Deeks JJ Glasziou P et al. Chapter 12: Interpreting results drawing conclusions. In: Higgins JPT Green S (editors) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from http://training.cochrane.org/handbook
Shafir, 2012, Shared Decision Making: Advancing Patient-Centered Care through State and Federal Implementation, 1

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 698

Is Shared Decision-making Associated with Better Patient-reported Outcomes? A Longitudinal Study of Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty
Chrenka, E. A. B., Solberg, L. I., Asche, S. E., Dehmer, S. P., Ziegenfuss, J. Y., Whitebird, R. R., Norton, C. K., Reams, M., Johnson, P. G., & Elwyn, G. J. (2021) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/corr.0000000000001920 · Cited by 26
Self-citation
Shared Decision-Making in Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review
Li, X., Meng, M., Zhao, J., Zhang, X., Yang, D., Fang, J., Wang, J., Liu, H., & Hao, Y. (2021) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s335080 · Cited by 26
Handoffs and Teamwork: A Framework for Care Transition Communication
Webster, K. L. W., Keebler, J. R., Chaparro, A., Greilich, P. E., Fagerlund, A., & Lazzara, E. H. (2022) · The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety · doi:10.1016/j.jcjq.2022.04.001 · Cited by 28
Indications for, and timing of, planned caesarean section: A systematic analysis of clinical guidelines
Coates, D., Homer, C., Wilson, A. M., Deady, L., Mason, E., Foureur, M. J., & Henry, A. (2019) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2019.06.011 · Cited by 29
Shared decision-making in advanced kidney disease: a scoping review protocol
Engels, N., de Graav, G. N., van der Nat, P. B., van den Dorpel, M., Bos, W. J. W., & Stiggelbout, A. M. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034142 · Cited by 25
Variations in factors associated with healthcare providers’ intention to engage in interprofessional shared decision making in home care: results of two cross-sectional surveys
Adekpedjou, R., Haesebaert, J., Stacey, D., Brière, N., Freitas, A., Rivest, L., & Légaré, F. (2020) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-020-5064-3 · Cited by 24
Self-citation
Professional training on shared decision making with older adults living with neurocognitive disorders: a mixed-methods implementation study
Lawani, M. A., Côté, L., Coudert, L., Morin, M., Witteman, H. O., Caron, D., Kröger, E., Voyer, P., Rodríguez, C., Légaré, F., et al. (2020) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-020-01197-9 · Cited by 25
Self-citation
Shared Clinical Decision-Making Recommendations for Adult Immunization: What Do Physicians Think?
Kempe, A., Lindley, M. C., O’Leary, S. T., Crane, L. A., Cataldi, J. R., Brtnikova, M., Beaty, B. L., Matlock, D. D., Gorman, C., & Hurley, L. P. (2021) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-020-06456-z · Cited by 28
Barriers and enablers for implementation of clinical practice guidelines in maternity and neonatal settings: A rapid review
Raghunathan, K., East, C. E., & Poudel, K. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0315588 · Cited by 26
Can shared decision-making interventions increase trust/trustworthiness in the physician-patient encounter? A scoping review
Strokes, N., Lloyd, C., Girardin, A. L., Santana, C. S., Mangus, C. W., Mitchell, K. E., Hughes, A. R., Nelson, B. B., Gunn, B., & Schoenfeld, E. M. (2025) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2025.108705 · Cited by 24
The effect of a scalable online training module for shared decision making based on flawed video examples – a randomized controlled trial
Geiger, F., Hacke, C., Potthoff, J., Scheibler, F., Rueffer, J. U., Kuch, C., & Wehkamp, K. (2020) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.033 · Cited by 23
Views of health professionals on risk-based breast cancer screening and its implementation in the Spanish National Health System: A qualitative discussion group study
Vásquez, C. L., Codern‐Bové, N., Cardona, À., Hernández, M. J., Pérez-Lacasta, M. J., Carles-Lavila, M., Rué, M., & on behalf of the DECIDO group (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0263788 · Cited by 28
Perspectives on the essential skills of healthcare decision making in children and adolescents with intellectual disability
Downs, J. A., Keeley, J., Skoss, R., Mills, J., Nevill, T., Schippers, A., Lindly, O. J., & Thompson, S. (2024) · International Journal for Equity in Health · doi:10.1186/s12939-024-02204-5 · Cited by 25
Nursing strategies for enhancing calm in older Arabs with dementia: integrating Snoezelen methods, aromatherapy, and personal items to reduce agitation
Alruwaili, A. N., Alruwaili, M. M., Ramadan, O. M. E., Ali, S. I., & Shaban, M. (2024) · Geriatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2024.07.017 · Cited by 24
Shared decision making in musculoskeletal pain consultations in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
Sam, S., Sharma, R., Igwesi-Chidobe, C. N., & Babatunde, O. O. (2019) · International Health · doi:10.1093/inthealth/ihz077 · Cited by 26
A systematic review of shared decision making training programs for general practitioners
Jaeken, J., Billiouw, C., Mertens, L., Bostraeten, P. V., Bekkering, G. E., Vermandere, M., Aertgeerts, B., van Mileghem, L., & Delvaux, N. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05557-1 · Cited by 26
Feasibility and effectiveness of tools that support communication and decision making in life-prolonging treatments for patients in hospital: a systematic review
Thodé, M., Pasman, H. R. W., van Vliet, L. M., Damman, O. C., Ket, J. C. F., Francke, A. L., & Jongerden, I. P. (2020) · BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care · doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002284 · Cited by 22
Effects of a time out consultation with the general practitioner on cancer treatment decision‐making: a randomised controlled trial
Perfors, I. A. A., Noteboom, E. A., de Wit, N. J., van der Wall, E., Visserman, E., van Dalen, T., Verhagen, M. A. M. T., Witkamp, A. J., Koelemij, R., Flinterman, A. E., et al. (2020) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.5604 · Cited by 22
Evaluation of the Use of Shared Decision Making in Breast Cancer: International Survey
Maes‐Carballo, M., Martín‐Díaz, M., Mignini, L. E., Khan, K. S., Trigueros, R., & Bueno‐Cavanillas, A. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18042128 · Cited by 22
Evaluation of a multilevel implementation program for timeout and shared decision making in breast cancer care: a mixed methods study among 11 hospital teams
van Veenendaal, H., Voogdt-Pruis, H. R., Ubbink, D. T., van Weele, E., Kočo, L., Schuurman, M., Oskam, J., Visserman, E., & Hilders, C. G. J. M. (2021) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2021.05.005 · Cited by 22
Identifying barriers to shared decision‐making about bariatric surgery in two large health systems
Arterburn, D. E., Tuzzio, L., Anau, J., Lewis, C. C., Williams, N. A., Courcoulas, A. P., Stilwell, D., Tavakkoli, A., Ahmed, B. H., Wilcox, M. N., et al. (2023) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.23647 · Cited by 22
Implementing shared decision-making interventions in breast cancer clinical practice: a scoping review
Oprea, N., Ardito, V., & Ciani, O. (2023) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-023-02263-8 · Cited by 23
Patient-reported effects of hospital-wide implementation of shared decision-making at a university medical centre in Germany: a pre–post trial
Scheibler, F., Geiger, F., Wehkamp, K., Danner, M., Debrouwere, M., Stolz-Klingenberg, C., Schuldt-Joswig, A., Sommer, C. G., Kopeleva, O., Bünzen, C., et al. (2023) · BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112462 · Cited by 22
How do GPs and patients share the responsibility for cancer safety netting follow-up actions? A qualitative interview study of GPs and patients in Oxfordshire, UK
Evans, J., MacArtney, J. I., Bankhead, C. R., Albury, C., Jones, D. J., Ziébland, S., & Nicholson, B. D. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029316 · Cited by 22
Implementation and sustainability factors of two early-stage breast cancer conversation aids in diverse practices
Schubbe, D. C., Yen, R. W., Saunders, C. H., Elwyn, G. J., Forcino, R. C., O’Malley, A. J., Politi, M. C., Margenthaler, J. A., Volk, R. J., Sepucha, K., et al. (2021) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-021-01115-1 · Cited by 23
Self-citation
Shared decision making in Australian physiotherapy practice: A survey of knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported use
Hoffmann, T., Gibson, E. M., Barnett, C., & Maher, C. G. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0251347 · Cited by 21
Identifying residents’ educational needs to optimising postgraduate medical education about shared decision-making
Baghus, A., Giroldi, E., Timmerman, A. A., Schmitz, E., Erkan, F., Röhlinger, D., Pieterse, A. H., Dielissen, P. W., Kramer, A. W. M., Rietmeijer, C. B. T., et al. (2022) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2022.06.016 · Cited by 21
Mixed-Method Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Shared Decision-Making Tools for Cancer Screening
Herrera, D. J., van de Veerdonk, W., Berhe, N. M., Talboom, S., van Loo, M., Ruíz-Alejos, A., Ferrari, A., & Hal, G. F. V. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15153867 · Cited by 22
A Comprehensive Review of Postoperative Analgesics Used in Orthopedic Practice
Goel, S., Deshpande, S. V., Jadawala, V. H., Suneja, A., & Singh, R. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.48750 · Cited by 21
Patient-centered communication and shared decision making to reduce HbA1c levels of patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus - results of the cluster-randomized controlled DEBATE trial
Wollny, A., Altiner, A., Daubmann, A., Drewelow, E., Helbig, C., Löscher, S., Pentzek, M., Santos, S., Wegscheider, K., Wilm, S., et al. (2019) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-019-0977-9 · Cited by 21
The effects of in-hospital orthogeriatric care on health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Vleeshouwers, K., Beert, J., Boonen, A. E. R. C. H., Janssen, D. J. A., Dejaeger, M., Deschodt, M., Roo, M. L. D., & Spaetgens, B. (2025) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afaf106 · Cited by 20
General dental practitioners' perceptions of shared decision making: a qualitative study
Hayer, N., & Wassif, H. S. (2022) · BDJ · doi:10.1038/s41415-022-3980-9 · Cited by 20
Impact of clinical decision-making participation and satisfaction on outcomes in mental health practice: results from the CEDAR European longitudinal study
Luciano, M., Fiorillo, A., Brandi, C., Vincenzo, M. D., Égerházi, A., Hiltensperger, R., Kawohl, W., Kovacs, A. I., Wulf Rössler, A., Slade, M., et al. (2022) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/09540261.2022.2085507 · Cited by 21
Midwives’ empathy and shared decision making from women’s perspective - sensitivity of an assessment to compare quality of care in prenatal and obstetric care
Schulz, A. A., & Wirtz, M. (2022) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-022-05041-y · Cited by 17
Co-designing a theory-informed intervention to increase shared decision-making in maternity care
Waddell, A., Spassova, G., Sampson, L., Jungbluth, L., Dam, J., & Bragge, P. (2023) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-023-00959-x · Cited by 20
OMERACT Development of a Core Domain Set of Outcomes for Shared Decision-making Interventions
Toupin‐April, K., Barton, J. L., Fraenkel, L., Meara, A. S., LI, L. C., Brooks, P., de Wit, M. P. T., Stacey, D., Légaré, F., Shea, B., et al. (2019) · The Journal of Rheumatology · doi:10.3899/jrheum.181071 · Cited by 21
Self-citation
“Be an ambassador for change that you would like to see”: a call to action to all stakeholders for co-creation in healthcare and medical research to improve quality of life of people with a neuromuscular disease
on behalf of the 235th ENMC workshop study group, Ambrosini, A., Quinlivan, R. C. M., Sansone, V., Meijer, I., Schrijvers, G., Tibben, A., Padberg, G. W., de Wit, M. P. T., Sterrenburg, E., et al. (2019) · Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases · doi:10.1186/s13023-019-1103-8 · Cited by 20
Enhanced Youden's index with net benefit: A feasible approach for optimal‐threshold determination in shared decision making
Lin, S., Ma, Y., & Zou, H. (2019) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.13311 · Cited by 19
Extent and Predictors of Decision Regret among Informal Caregivers Making Decisions for a Loved One: A Systematic Review
Elidor, H., Adekpedjou, R., Zomahoun, H. T. V., Charif, A. B., Agbadjé, T. T., Rhéault, N., & Légaré, F. (2020) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x20963038 · Cited by 19
Self-citation
Predictors of Regret among Older Men after Stress Urinary Incontinence Treatment Decisions
Hampson, L. A. (2022) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 19
Sustainability of large-scale implementation of shared decision making with the SHARE TO CARE program
Stolz-Klingenberg, C., Hacke, C., Coors, M., Flüh, C., Margraf, N. G., Wehkamp, K., Clayman, M. L., Scheibler, F., Wehking, F., Rüffer, J. U., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2022.1037447 · Cited by 19
Equity in Choosing Wisely and beyond: the effect of health literacy on healthcare decision-making and methods to support conversations about overuse
Muscat, D. M., Cvejic, E., Smith, J., Thompson, R., Chang, E., Tracy, M., Zadro, J. R., Linder, R., & McCaffery, K. J. (2024) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017411 · Cited by 19
Can patients be trained to expect shared decision making in clinical consultations? Feasibility study of a public library program to raise patient awareness
Adisso, É. L., Borde, V., Saint-Hilaire, M.-È., Robitaille, H., Archambault, P. M., Blais, J., Cameron, C. F., Cauchon, M., Fleet, R. P., Létourneau, J.-S., et al. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208449 · Cited by 17
Self-citation
Strategies for Patient, Family, and Caregiver Engagement
Bennett, W. L., Pitts, S. I., Aboumatar, H. J., Sharma, R., Smith, B. M., Das, A., Day, J., Holzhauer, K., & Bass, E. B. (2020) · doi:10.23970/ahrqepctb36 · Cited by 19
Shared decision making in chronic medication use: Scenarios depicting exemplary care
Ward, J., Kalsi, D., Barnett, N. L., Fulford, B. K. W. M., & Handa, A. I. (2019) · Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.04.047 · Cited by 18
Evaluation of a Digital Self-management Platform for Patients With Chronic Illness in Primary Care: Qualitative Study of Stakeholders’ Perspectives
van de Vijver, S. J. M., Hummel, D., van Dijk, A. H., Cox, J., van Dijk, O., den Broek, N. V., & Metting, E. (2022) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/38424 · Cited by 18
Patients’ perspectives on shared decision making in secondary mental healthcare in Taiwan: A qualitative study
Lin, C.-Y., Renwick, L., & Lovell, K. (2020) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2020.05.030 · Cited by 18
The experiences of shared decision-making of women who had an induction of labour
Coates, D., Thirukumar, P., & Henry, A. (2020) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.020 · Cited by 18
Patient-reported outcome measures for knowledge transfer and behaviour modification interventions in type 2 diabetes—the INDICA study: a multiarm cluster randomised controlled trial
Ramallo‐Fariña, Y., Rivero‐Santana, A., García‐Pérez, L., Bello, M. Á. G., Wägner, A. M., González‐Pacheco, H., Rodríguez‐Rodríguez, L., Kaiser-Girardot, S., Monzón-Monzón, G., Guerra-Marrero, C., et al. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050804 · Cited by 18
What Are Patients Told About Innovative Surgical Procedures? A Qualitative Synthesis of 7 Case Studies in the United Kingdom
Elliott, D., Ochieng, C., Zahra, J., McNair, A., Main, B., Skilton, A., Blencowe, N., Cousins, S., Paramasivan, S., Hoffmann, C., et al. (2022) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000005714 · Cited by 17
General Practitioners’ needs and wishes for clinical decision support Systems: A focus group study
Westerbeek, L., de Bruijn, G., van Weert, H. C. P. M., Abu–Hanna, A., Medlock, S. K., & van Weert, J. C. M. (2022) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104901 · Cited by 23
Effective communication and shared decision making: Theoretical approach from the doctor-patient relationship approach
González‐Argote, J. (2022) · Seminars in Medical Writing and Education · doi:10.56294/mw202212 · Cited by 17
Barriers and Enablers to Using a Patient-Facing Electronic Questionnaire: A Qualitative Theoretical Domains Framework Analysis
Yamada, J., Kouri, A., Simard, S.-N., Segovia, S. A., & Gupta, S. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/19474 · Cited by 21
Gamification for Machine Learning in Surgical Patient Engagement
Balch, J. A., Efron, P. A., Bihorac, A., & Loftus, T. J. (2022) · Frontiers in Surgery · doi:10.3389/fsurg.2022.896351 · Cited by 17
Question prompt lists and endorsement of question‐asking support patients to get the information they seek—A longitudinal qualitative study
Tracy, M., Ayre, J., Mac, O. A., Copp, T., Trevena, L. J., & Shepherd, H. L. (2022) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13509 · Cited by 17
Integrating population-based biobanks: Catalyst for advances in precision health
Lin, J.-C., Liu, Y., Hsiao, W. W., & Fan, C.-T. (2024) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2024.10.049 · Cited by 16
The shared decision-making model: Providers' and patients' knowledge and understanding in clinical practice
Baca-Dietz, D., Wojnar, D., & Espina, C. R. (2020) · Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners · doi:10.1097/jxx.0000000000000401 · Cited by 16
Shared decision making and patient-centeredness for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care—results of the cluster-randomised controlled DEBATE trial
Wollny, A., Löffler, C., Drewelow, E., Altiner, A., Helbig, C., Daubmann, A., Wegscheider, K., Löscher, S., Pentzek, M., Wilm, S., et al. (2021) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-021-01436-6 · Cited by 19
Lifestyle Medicine for Chronic Lower Back Pain: An Evidence-Based Approach
Altug, Z. (2021) · American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine · doi:10.1177/1559827620971547 · Cited by 16
Development and acceptability of a decision aid for chronic insomnia considering discontinuation of benzodiazepine hypnotics
Aoki, Y., Takaesu, Y., Suzuki, M., Okajima, I., Takeshima, M., Shimura, A., Utsumi, T., Kotorii, N., Yamashita, H., Kuriyama, K., et al. (2021) · Neuropsychopharmacology Reports · doi:10.1002/npr2.12219 · Cited by 16
Shared decision-making and person-centred care approaches in three African regions
Gogovor, A., Fakhfakh, M., Bouba, D. A., Acakpo, O., Ayivi‐Vinz, G., Musabyimana, A., & Garvelink, M. M. (2022) · Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen · doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.023 · Cited by 16
Support Tools for Preference-Sensitive Decisions in Healthcare: Where Are We? Where Do We Go? How Do We Get There?
Ostermann, J., Brown, D. S., van Til, J. A., Bansback, N. J., Légaré, F., Marshall, D. A., & Bewtra, M. (2019) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-019-00372-z · Cited by 16
Self-citation
Involving older people with multimorbidity in decision-making about their primary healthcare: A Cochrane systematic review of interventions (abridged)
Butterworth, J. E., Goulding, R., McDonagh, S. T. J., Bower, P., Pitchforth, E., Richards, S. H., & Campbell, J. (2020) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2020.04.008 · Cited by 16
Collaborative Goal Setting: A Clinical Approach for Adults With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Brown, J. A., Ackley, K., & Knollman-Porter, K. (2021) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2021_ajslp-21-00078 · Cited by 16
2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients
Shah, M. J., Silka, M. J., Silva, J. N. A., Balaji, S., Beach, C. M., Benjamin, M. N., Berul, C. I., Cannon, B. C., Cecchin, F., Cohen, M. I., et al. (2021) · Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ipej.2021.07.005 · Cited by 16
“You become a slightly better doctor”: Doctors adopting integrated medical expertise through interactions with E-patients
Shachar, L. (2022) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115038 · Cited by 16
Patient Information Leaflets for Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Missed Opportunity
Low, M., Burgess, L. C., & Wainwright, T. W. (2019) · Journal of Patient Experience · doi:10.1177/2374373519897176 · Cited by 15
Shared decision-making for the treatment of proximal femoral fractures in frail institutionalised older patients: healthcare providers’ perceived barriers and facilitators
Spronk, I., Loggers, S. A. I., Joosse, P., Willems, H. C., van Balen, R., Gosens, T., Ponsen, K. J., Steens, J., van de Ree, C. L. P., Zuurmond, R. G., et al. (2022) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afac174 · Cited by 16
Effectiveness of Shared Decision-making Training Programs for Health Care Professionals Using Reflexivity Strategies: Secondary Analysis of a Systematic Review
Diouf, N. T., Musabyimana, A., Blanchette, V., Lépine, J., Guay-Bélanger, S., Tremblay, M., Dogba, M. J., & Légaré, F. (2022) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/42033 · Cited by 16
Self-citation
Finding Your Way – A shared decision making resource developed by and for Aboriginal people in Australia: Perceived acceptability, usability, and feasibility
Dimopoulos-Bick, T. L., Follent, D., Kostovski, C., Middleton, V., Paulson, C., SUTHERLAND, S. R., CAWLEY, M. I. D., Files, M., Follent, S., Osten, R., et al. (2023) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2023.107920 · Cited by 15
Reviewing the Landscape of Cancer Survivorship: Insights from Dr. Lidia Schapira’s Programs and Beyond
Cortiana, V., Abbas, R. H., Nadar, S., Mahendru, D., Gambill, J. L., Menon, G. P., Park, C. H., & Leyfman, Y. (2024) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers16061216 · Cited by 15
Improving Patient Information and Enhanced Consent in Urology: The Impact of Simulation and Multimedia Tools. A Systematic Literature Review from the European Association of Urology Patient Office
Nedbal, C., Juliebø‐Jones, P., Rogers, E. T., N'Dow, J. M., Ribal, M. J., Rassweiler, J. J., LIATSIKOS, E. N., Poppel, H. V., & Somani, B. K. (2024) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2024.04.009 · Cited by 15
Building Trust: The Foundations of Reliability in Healthcare
Jabeen, G., Goli, G., & Kafila (2024) · Engineering cyber-physical systems and critical infrastructures · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-65434-3_3 · Cited by 15
Development of a contemporary evidence-based practice workshop for health professionals with a focus on pre-appraised evidence and shared decision-making: a before-after pilot study
Albarqouni, L., Glasziou, P., Bakhit, M., Mar, C. D., & Hoffmann, T. (2019) · BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111220 · Cited by 15
Development of a patient decision aid for treatment resistant depression
Shillington, A. C., Langenecker, S. A., Shelton, R. C., Foxworth, P. M., Allen, L. G., Rhodes, M., Pesa, J. A., Williamson, D., & Holmes-Rovner, M. M. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.014 · Cited by 15
User-centered and theory-based design of a professional training program on shared decision-making with older adults living with neurocognitive disorders: a mixed-methods study
Lawani, M. A., Turgeon, Y., Côté, L., Légaré, F., Witteman, H. O., Morin, M., Kröger, E., Voyer, P., Rodríguez, C., & Giguere, A. M. C. (2021) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-021-01396-y · Cited by 15
Self-citation
Allergen immunotherapy and shared decision-making
Settipane, R. A., & Bukstein, D. A. (2022) · Allergy and Asthma Proceedings · doi:10.2500/aap.2022.43.220017 · Cited by 15
Do not routinely test for vitamin D
McChesney, C., Singer, A. G., Duquette, D., Forouhi, N. G., & Levinson, W. S. (2022) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-070270 · Cited by 15
The Position of Neuromuscular Patients in Shared Decision Making. Report from the 235th ENMC Workshop: Milan, Italy, January 19-20, 2018
Lochmüller, H., on behalf of the 235th ENMC workshop study group, Ambrosini, A., van Engelen, B. G. M., HANSSON, M. G., Tibben, A., Breukel, A. I. M., Sterrenburg, E., Schrijvers, G., Meijer, I., et al. (2019) · Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases · doi:10.3233/jnd-180368 · Cited by 15
AI support for ethical decision-making around resuscitation: proceed with care
Biller-Andorno, N., Ferrario, A., Joebges, S., Krones, T., Massini, F., Barth, P., Arampatzis, G., & Krauthammer, M. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.08.17.20171769 · Cited by 67
Development of a Shared Decision-Making Tool for Adolescents With Scoliosis to Decide Between Observation Versus Fusion Surgery
Ifelayo, O. I., Brito, J. P., Hargraves, I. G., & Larson, A. N. (2021) · Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics · doi:10.1097/bpo.0000000000001800 · Cited by 14
Incorporating patient-reported outcomes into shared decision-making in the management of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study protocol
Lin, E., Uhler, L. M., Finley, E. P., Jayakumar, P., Rathouz, P. J., Bozic, K. J., & Tsevat, J. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055933 · Cited by 14
A blended learning for general practitioners and nurses on skills to support shared decision-making with patients about palliative cancer treatment: A one-group pre-posttest study
van den Hoek, D. W. B. –., Smets, E. M. A., Ali, R., Baas-Thijssen, M. C. M., Bomhof‐Roordink, H., Helsper, C. W., Stacey, D., Tange, D., van Laarhoven, H. W. M., & Henselmans, I. (2023) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2023.107712 · Cited by 18
Self-citation
Gender bias in shared decision‐making among cancer care guidelines: A systematic review
Rivera‐Izquierdo, M., Maes‐Carballo, M., Jiménez‐Moleón, J. J., Martínez‐Ruiz, V., Blaakær, J., Olmedo‐Requena, R., Khan, K. S., & Jørgensen, J. S. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13753 · Cited by 14
Developing a Patient‐ and Family‐Centered Research Agenda for Hospital Medicine: The Improving Hospital Outcomes through Patient Engagement (i‐HOPE) Study
Harrison, J. D., Archuleta, M., Avitia, E., Banta, J., Benn, J., Burden, M. A., Chopra, V., Coker, R., Eid, S. M., Fang, M. C., et al. (2020) · Journal of Hospital Medicine · doi:10.12788/jhm.3386 · Cited by 14
Development of support material for health professionals who are implementing Shared Decision-making in breast cancer screening: validation using the Delphi technique
Hernández, M. J., Codern‐Bové, N., Pérez-Lacasta, M. J., Cardona, À., Vidal, C., & Carles-Lavila, M. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052566 · Cited by 14
Shared Decision-Making During Initial Diagnostic and Treatment Planning Visits for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Mulé, C. M., Lavelle, T. A., Sliwinski, S. K., & Wong, J. B. (2021) · Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics · doi:10.1097/dbp.0000000000000903 · Cited by 13
Variance components of ratings of physician-patient communication: A generalizability theory analysis
Röttele, N., Schlett, C., Körner, M., Farin‐Glattacker, E., Schöpf-Lazzarino, A. C., Voigt-Radloff, S., & Wirtz, M. A. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0252968 · Cited by 13
Perspectives of Patients and Providers in Using Shared Decision Making in Psychiatry
Maples, N. J., Velligan, D. I., Jones, E. C., Espinosa, E. M., Morgan, R. O., & Valerio-Shewmaker, M. A. (2021) · Community Mental Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10597-021-00856-z · Cited by 13
Technology-supported shared decision-making in chronic conditions: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Vaseur, R. M. E., Braake, E. T., Beinema, T. C., Nijeweme-d’Hollosy, W. O., & Tabak, M. (2024) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2024.108267 · Cited by 17
Assessing the efficacy of the Stop OsteoARthritis (SOAR) program: A randomized delayed-controlled trial in persons at increased risk of early onset post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis
Losciale, J. M., Truong, L. K., Zhang, K., Silvester-Lee, T., Miciak, M., Pajkic, A., Le, C. Y., Xie, H., Hoens, A. M., Mosewich, A. D., et al. (2024) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2024.04.003 · Cited by 15
Invisible Work Meets Visible Work: Infrastructuring from the Perspective of Patients and Healthcare Professionals
Íslind, A. S., Hult, H. V., Johansson, V., Angenete, E., & Gellerstedt, M. (2021) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2021.431 · Cited by 14
Tomada de decisão compartilhada na saúde: aproximações e distanciamentos entre a ajuda decisional e os apoios de tomada de decisão
Albuquerque, A., & Antunes, C. M. T. B. (2021) · CADERNOS IBERO-AMERICANOS DE DIREITO SANITÁRIO · doi:10.17566/ciads.v10i1.621 · Cited by 10
Promoting Informed Decisions About Colorectal Cancer Screening in Older Adults (PRIMED Study): a Physician Cluster Randomized Trial
Sepucha, K., Han, P. K. J., Chang, Y., Atlas, S. J., Korsen, N., Leavitt, L., Lee, V., Percac‐Lima, S., Mancini, B., Richter, J. M., et al. (2022) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-022-07738-4 · Cited by 13
Estratégias para abordar a Judicialização da Saúde no Brasil: uma síntese de evidências
Floriano, F. R., Boeira, L. D. S., Biella, C. D. A., Pereira, V. C., Carvalho, M., Barreto, J. O. M., & de Oliveira, S. M. D. V. L. (2023) · Ciência & Saúde Coletiva · doi:10.1590/1413-81232023281.09132022 · Cited by 13
Decision Support for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Replacement
Lewis, K. B., Birnie, D. H., Carroll, S. L., Brousseau-Whaley, C., Clark, L., Green, M. S., Nair, G. M., Nery, P. B., Redpath, C. J., & Stacey, D. (2020) · The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1097/jcn.0000000000000694 · Cited by 13
Self-citation
Does the use of patient decision aids lead to cost savings? a systematic review
Scalia, P., Barr, P. J., O’Neill, C., Crealey, G., Bagley, P. J., Blunt, H. B., & Elwyn, G. J. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036834 · Cited by 13
Self-citation
Shared Decision Making Interventions for Deprescribing in Older Adults With Polypharmacy: A Scoping Review
Fariman, S., Arabshomali, A., Goordeen, D., Niznik, J. D., Hemati, H., & Lafata, J. E. (2025) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.70059 · Cited by 14
Research on the Mining of Intangible Cultural Heritage Digital Resources in the Manual Online Teaching System of Preschool Education
Jun, Z., & Li, X. (2022) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2022/2136597 · Cited by 13
Retracted
Decision aids for cancer survivors’ engagement with survivorship care services after primary treatment: a systematic review
Ke, Y., Zhou, H., Chan, R. J., & Chan, A. (2022) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-022-01230-y · Cited by 12

Authors: Légaré, F., Adekpedjou, R., Stacey, D., Turcotte, S., Kryworuchko, J., Graham, I. D., Lyddiatt, A., Politi, M. C., Thomson, R., Elwyn, G., & Donner-Banzhoff, N.
Affiliations: Université Laval (CA)
University of Ottawa (CA)
Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise (CA)
University of British Columbia (CA)
No affiliation; 28 Greenwood Road Ingersoll ON Canada N5C 3N1
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Newcastle University (GB)
Cochrane (GB)
University of Marburg; Department of Family Medicine / General Practice; Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 4 Marburg Germany D-35039
ORCID: Légaré, France
Adekpedjou, Rhéda
Stacey, Dawn
Turcotte, Stéphane
Kryworuchko, Jennifer
Graham, Ian D
Lyddiatt, Anne
Politi, Mary C
Elwyn, Glyn
Venue: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 2018-07-19
Volume: 2018
Issue: 7
Pages: CD006732-CD006732
ISSN: 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
1465-1858
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006732.pub4
PMC: PMC6513543
OpenAlex: W2884603128
Cited by: 698
References: 205
Citations by year: 2026: 34 · 2025: 120 · 2024: 124 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 8
FWCI: 10.20
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Locations: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics: Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords: shared decision-making, healthcare workers, intervention, decision aids, patient activation, patient education, patient-provider communication, decision regret, patient satisfaction, patient-reported outcomes, patient-centered care, implementation of shared decision making, multicomponent intervention, contamination risk, risk of bias, quality of evidence, patient engagement, patient participation
MeSH terms: Decision Making, Decision Support Techniques, Health Personnel, Humans, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Participation, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks