Cited by 698Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareHealth Policy Implementation SciencePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 204 of the 205 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals

Open access

Légaré, France, Adekpedjou, Rhéda, Stacey, Dawn, Turcotte, Stéphane, Kryworuchko, Jennifer, Graham, Ian D, Lyddiatt, Anne, Politi, Mary C, Thomson, Richard, Elwyn, Glyn, Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert·2018·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006732.pub4PMC PMC6513543

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is a process by which a healthcare choice is made by the patient, significant others, or both with one or more healthcare professionals. However, it has not yet been widely adopted in practice. This is the second update of this Cochrane review. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of interventions for increasing the use of SDM by healthcare professionals. We considered interventions targeting patients, interventions targeting healthcare professionals, and interventions targeting both. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and five other databases on 15 June 2017. We also searched two clinical trials registries and proceedings of relevant conferences. We checked reference lists and contacted study authors to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and non-randomized trials, controlled before-after studies and interrupted time series studies evaluating interventions for increasing the use of SDM in which the primary outcomes were evaluated using observer-based or patient-reported measures. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We included 87 studies (45,641 patients and 3113 healthcare professionals) conducted mainly in the USA, Germany, Canada and the Netherlands. Risk of bias was high or unclear for protection against contamination, low for differences in the baseline characteristics of patients, and unclear for other domains.Forty-four studies evaluated interventions targeting patients. They included decision aids, patient activation, question prompt lists and training for patients among others and were administered alone (single intervention) or in combination (multifaceted intervention). The certainty of the evidence was very low. It is uncertain if interventions targeting patients when compared with usual care increase SDM whether measured by observation (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.13 to 1.22; 4 studies; N = 424) or reported by patients (SMD 0.32, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.48; 9 studies; N = 1386; risk difference (RD) -0.09, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.01; 6 studies; N = 754), reduce decision regret (SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.19; 1 study; N = 212), improve physical (SMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.36; 1 study; N = 116) or mental health-related quality of life (QOL) (SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.46; 1 study; N = 116), affect consultation length (SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.58; 2 studies; N = 224) or cost (SMD 0.82, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.22; 1 study; N = 105).It is uncertain if interventions targeting patients when compared with interventions of the same type increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 0.88, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.37; 3 studies; N = 271) or reported by patients (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.24; 11 studies; N = 1906); (RD 0.03, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.08; 10 studies; N = 2272); affect consultation length (SMD -0.65, 95% CI -1.29 to -0.00; 1 study; N = 39) or costs. No data were reported for decision regret, physical or mental health-related QOL.Fifteen studies evaluated interventions targeting healthcare professionals. They included educational meetings, educational material, educational outreach visits and reminders among others. The certainty of evidence is very low. It is uncertain if these interventions when compared with usual care increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 0.70, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.19; 6 studies; N = 479) or reported by patients (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.20; 5 studies; N = 5772); (RD 0.01, 95%C: -0.03 to 0.06; 2 studies; N = 6303); reduce decision regret (SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.51; 1 study; N = 326), affect consultation length (SMD 0.51, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.81; 1 study, N = 175), cost (no data available) or physical health-related QOL (SMD 0.16, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.36; 1 study; N = 359). Mental health-related QOL may slightly improve (SMD 0.28, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.49; 1 study, N = 359; low-certainty evidence).It is uncertain if interventions targeting healthcare professionals compared to interventions of the same type increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD -0.30, 95% CI -1.19 to 0.59; 1 study; N = 20) or reported by patients (SMD 0.24, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.58; 2 studies; N = 1459) as the certainty of the evidence is very low. There was insufficient information to determine the effect on decision regret, physical or mental health-related QOL, consultation length or costs.Twenty-eight studies targeted both patients and healthcare professionals. The interventions used a combination of patient-mediated and healthcare professional directed interventions. Based on low certainty evidence, it is uncertain whether these interventions, when compared with usual care, increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 1.10, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.79; 6 studies; N = 1270) or reported by patients (SMD 0.13, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.28; 7 studies; N = 1479); (RD -0.01,

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd006732.pub4

Cites

204 of 204 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
The “Golden Age” of Probiotics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Observational Studies in Preterm Infants
Dermyshi, E., Wang, Y., Yan, C., Hong, W., Qiu, G., Gong, X., & Zhang, T. (2017) · Neonatology · doi:10.1159/000454668 · Cited by 24,586
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
Guyatt, G., Oxman, A. D., Akl, E. A., Kunz, R., Vist, G., Brozek, J., Norris, S., Falck-Ytter, Y., Glasziou, P., & deBeer, H. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026 · Cited by 10,681
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
Stacey, D., Légaré, F., Lewis, K., Barry, M. J., Bennett, C. L., Eden, K. B., Holmes-Rovner, M., Llewellyn-Thomas, H., Lyddiatt, A., Thomson, R., et al. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001431.pub5 · Cited by 6,685
Self-citation
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration
Higgins, J., Green, S. R., & Higgins, J. (2008) · Cited by 5,544
Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango)
Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. (1997) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00221-3 · Cited by 4,137 · cited 3×
“Briefly, SDM depends on knowing and understanding the best available evidence about the risks and benefits across all available options while ensuring that the patient’s values and preferences are taken into account (Charles 1997; Elwyn 1999; Towle 1999).”
Background
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials
Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & for the CONSORT Group* (2010) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232 · Cited by 3,824
Oral health of individuals aged 3-80 years in Jönköping, Sweden during 40 years (1973-2013). II. Review of clinical and radiographic findings.
Norderyd, O. M., Koch, G., Papias, A., Köhler, A. A., Helkimo, A. N., Brahm, C., Lindmark, U., Lindfors, N., Mattsson, A., Rolander, B., et al. (2015) · PubMed · Cited by 3,584
Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials
Campbell, M. K., Piaggio, G., Elbourne, D. R., Altman, D. G., & for the CONSORT Group (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e5661 · Cited by 3,510
Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies
Grimshaw, J., Thomas, R., MacLennan, G., Fraser, C., Ramsay, C., Vale, L., Whitty, P., Eccles, M., Matowe, L., Shirran, L., et al. (2004) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta8060 · Cited by 3,044

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 205 references

1 of the 205 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

Hermansen Kobulnicky, 2002, The behavioral impact of teaching patients to monitor side effects of chemotherapy: an intervention study
LeBlanc A Egginton J Inselman J Dick S Schuerman J Branda M Dissemination and Implementation of Evidence-Based Medicine in Primary Care Through The Use of Encounter Decision Aids: The ShareEBM Pragmatic Trial. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Oral communications 2017
Simmons M ‘If I could see on a piece of paper options for treatment that would just be insane’: Shared decision making in mental health. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Posters Sessions 2017
van Veenendaal H Voogdt-Pruis H Schuurman M Visserman E Oskam J Ubbink D Implementing shared decision-making (SDM) and time-out for breast cancer patients in six Dutch Hospitals. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Posters Sessions 2017
Adekpedjou R Stacey D Brière N Freitas A Garvelink M Turcotte S Improving the decision-making process with caregivers of elderly people about housing options: a cluster randomised trial. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Oral communications 2017
Dwinger S Gschwendtner K Müller N Bieber C Härter M Bergelt C Development and pilot testing of a face-to-face SDM coaching intervention for oncologists. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Oral communications 2017
Finderup J Dam Jensen JK Lomborg K Developing and pilot testing a shared decision-making intervention for dialysis choice. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Oral communications 2017
Henselmans H van Laarhoven HWM de Haes HCJM Tokat M Engelhardt EG van Maarschalkerweerd P Effect of a Skills Training for oncologists on shared decision making about palliative chemotherapy in simulated encounters. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Posters Sessions 2017
Lifford K Burton M Armitage F Collins K Reed M Wyld L Bridging the Age Gap trial of decision support interventions for older women with breast cancer: Preliminary process evaluation. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Posters Sessions 2017
Ludden T Taylor Y Kuhn L McWilliams A Dulin M Tapp H “Who Made the Decision Today?” Surveying asthma patients level of shared decision making in an RCT. ISDM2015. Sydney, Australia: Joint International Shared Decision-Making and International Society for Evidence-Based Health Care Conference 2015
Simmons L Meyer C Marques F Leavitt L Sepucha K Skills training for shared decision making: a randomized pilot study. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Oral communications 2017
Coulter A Engaging patients in their healthcare. How is the UK doing relative to other countries? Oxford: Picker Institute Europe 2006
Cochrane Effective Practice Organisation of Care (EPOC) What study designs should be included in an EPOC review? EPOC resources for review authors, 2017 Available at: http://epoc.cochrane.org/resources/epoc-resources-review-authors
Cochrane Effective Practice Organisation of Care (EPOC) Data collection form. EPOC Resources for review authors, 2017 Available at: http://epoc.cochrane.org/resources/epoc-resources-review-authors
Cochrane Effective Practice Organisation of Care (EPOC) Suggested risk of bias criteria for EPOC reviews. EPOC Resources for review authors, 2017 http://epoc.cochrane.org/resources/epoc-resources-review-authors
Cochrane Effective Practice Organisation of Care (EPOC) EPOC worksheets for preparing a Summary of Findings (SoF) table using GRADE. EPOC Resources for review authors, 2017 Available at: http://epoc.cochrane.org/resources/epoc-resources-review-authors
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2013, The Global Burden of Disease: Generating Evidence, Guiding Policy
Schünemann HJ Oxman AD Vist GE Higgins JPT Deeks JJ Glasziou P et al. Chapter 12: Interpreting results drawing conclusions. In: Higgins JPT Green S (editors) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from http://training.cochrane.org/handbook
Shafir, 2012, Shared Decision Making: Advancing Patient-Centered Care through State and Federal Implementation, 1

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 698

Shared decision-making and its influencing factors among parents of children with cancer in China: A cross-sectional study
Han, J., Zhou, X., Tang, D., Liu, T., & Liu, K. (2024) · European Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102512 · Cited by 6
Integrating Patient Involvement Interventions within Clinical Practice: A Mixed-Methods Study of Health Care Professional Reasoning
Holm, A., Rodkjær, L. Ø., & Bekker, H. (2024) · MDM Policy & Practice · doi:10.1177/23814683241229987 · Cited by 7
Effect of a person‐centred goals‐of‐care form and clinical communication training on shared decision‐making and outcomes in an acute hospital: a prospective longitudinal interventional study
Tierney, A., Milnes, S. L., Phillips, A., Simpson, N., Bailey, M., Corke, C. F., & Orford, N. R. (2024) · Internal Medicine Journal · doi:10.1111/imj.16381 · Cited by 6
Patients and informal caregivers in the lead: a qualitative study on the experiences of patients, informal caregivers, and healthcare professionals with involvement in treatment, e-health and self-management programs
Bosveld, M. H., Smits, A. G. M., Mertens, H. J. M. M., van Zandvoort, M. J. J. M., van Mook, W., & van Bokhoven, M. A. (2024) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-024-11156-z · Cited by 10
Personal, external, and psychological factors influencing adherence to nutrition and diet in patients undergoing metabolic/bariatric surgery: a systematic synthesis of mixed methods research
Bi, Y., He, L., Fang, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., & Gong, R. (2024) · Acta Diabetologica · doi:10.1007/s00592-024-02319-9 · Cited by 6
From policy to practice: prioritizing person-centred healthcare actions in the state of Victoria
Bragge, P., Horvat, L., McKinlay, L., Borg, K., MacLeod-Smith, B. J., & Wright, B. (2021) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-021-00782-2 · Cited by 6
Factors Associated with Decision Aid Use in Localized Prostate Cancer
Lane, G. I., Dupati, A., Qi, J., Ferrante, S., Dunn, R. L., Paudel, R., Wittmann, D. A., Wallner, L. P., Berry, D. L., Ellimoottil, C. S., et al. (2021) · Urology Practice · doi:10.1097/upj.0000000000000283 · Cited by 6
Consultation skills development in general practice: findings from a qualitative study of newly recruited and more experienced clinical pharmacists during the COVID-19 pandemic
Madden, M., Stewart, D., Mills, T., & McCambridge, J. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069017 · Cited by 6
Effect of communication skills training on documentation of shared decision-making for patients with life-limiting illness: An observational study in an intensive care unit
Milnes, S. L., Kerr, D. C., Hutchinson, A. F., Simpson, N., Mantzaridis, Y., Corke, C. F., Bailey, M., & Orford, N. R. (2023) · Critical Care and Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.04.005 · Cited by 6
Racial differences in veterans’ response to a standard vs. patient-centered decision aid for prostate cancer: Implications for decision making in African American and White men
Langford, A. T., Scherer, L. D., Ubel, P. A., Holmes-Rovner, M. M., Scherr, K. A., & Fagerlin, A. (2020) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.004 · Cited by 6
The effects of a brief hope intervention on decision‐making in chronic kidney disease patients: A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Chan, K., Wong, F. K. Y., Tam, S. L., Kwok, C. P., Fung, Y. P., & Wong, P. N. (2020) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.14520 · Cited by 6
How common are Chinese patients with multimorbidity involved in decision‐making and having a treatment plan? A cross‐sectional study
Lee, E. K. P., Wong, S. Y. S., Yip, B. H. K., Wong, E. L., Lai, F. T. T., Chan, D. C.-C., Chau, P. Y. K., Luk, L. H. F., & Yeoh, E. (2021) · International Journal of Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/ijcp.14286 · Cited by 6
Engaging Patients in Healthcare Improvement and Innovation
Elwyn, G. J., & Price, A. I. (2020) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119488620.ch14 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
Scarce Resource Allocation for Critically ill Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Public Health Emergency in São Paulo Brazil
Lin, C. A., Franco, J. B., Ribeiro, S. C. D. C., Dadalto, L., & Letaif, L. S. H. (2021) · Clinics · doi:10.6061/clinics/2021/e2191 · Cited by 6
Development of the IcanSDM scale to assess primary care clinicians’ ability to adopt shared decision-makingPreprint
Giguere, A. M. C., Bogza, L.-M., Coudert, L., Carmichael, P., Renaud, J., Légaré, F., Lindig, A., & Voyer, P. (2020) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.07.01.20144204 · Cited by 8
Self-citation
Decision aids: challenges for practice when we have confidence in effectiveness
Ryan, R. E., & Hill, S. (2024) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.ed000164 · Cited by 6
Contributors to Adherence to Exercise Therapy in Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Quantitative Research
Meuwissen, I., Vanderstraeten, R., Roussel, N. A., Meeus, M., Eetvelde, J. V., Meus, T., Timmermans, A. A. A., & Verbrugghe, J. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14176251 · Cited by 6
Development of a checklist for evaluation of shared decision-making in consultation for extremely preterm delivery
Guindon, M. G., Feltman, D. M., Litke-Wager, C., Okonek, E., Mullin, K. T., Anani, U. E., Murray, P. D., Mattson, C. D., & Krick, J. (2024) · Journal of Perinatology · doi:10.1038/s41372-024-02136-6 · Cited by 5
Gender and Patient Preferences: Unraveling the Decision-Making Process for Blepharoplasty Among Males and Females
Al-Dossary, S. K. (2025) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s474117 · Cited by 5
Long-term outcomes of Aripiprazole long-acting injectable: a 10-year mirror image study of patient acceptability and treatment effectiveness
Barnett, J., & Pappa, S. (2025) · Schizophrenia · doi:10.1038/s41537-025-00637-7 · Cited by 5
Informed Consent in Perinatal Care: Challenges and Best Practices in Obstetric and Midwifery-Led Models
Kokkosi, E., Stavros, S., Moustakli, E., Vedam, S., Potiris, A., Mavrogianni, D., Antonakopoulos, N., Panagopoulos, P., Drakakis, P., Gourounti, K., et al. (2025) · Nursing Reports · doi:10.3390/nursrep15080273 · Cited by 5
To what extent do general practitioners involve patients in decision-making? A systematic review of studies using the OPTION-instrument
Ubbink, D. T., Shamoun, F., Heuvelsland, S., van Etten‐Jamaludin, F. S., & Bolt, E. E. (2025) · Primary Health Care Research & Development · doi:10.1017/s1463423625100303 · Cited by 5
Decision Aids for Decision Making about Locally Advance Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
Maes‐Carballo, M., Martín‐Díaz, M., García‐García, M., Reinoso-Hermida, A., Mignini, L. E., Teixeira-Arcaya, R. P., Khan, K. S., & Bueno‐Cavanillas, A. (2023) · Cancer Investigation · doi:10.1080/07357907.2023.2164895 · Cited by 5
Shared decision-making experiences in child long-term ventilation: a systematic review
Peat, G., Delaney, S.-A., Gibson, F., Fraser, L., & Brierley, J. (2023) · European Respiratory Review · doi:10.1183/16000617.0098-2023 · Cited by 5
Healthcare provider perspectives on integrating a comprehensive spine care model in an academic health system: a cross-sectional survey
Burton, W. M., Salsbury, S. A., & Goertz, C. (2024) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-024-10578-z · Cited by 8
Navigating Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia During Pregnancy: Management Strategies and Considerations: A Comprehensive Review
Waghmare, B. V., & Jajoo, S. (2024) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.67284 · Cited by 5
Communication Processes Related to Decision‐Making in Medication Management Between Healthcare Providers, Older People and Their Carers: A Systematic Review
Copley, D. M., Manias, E., Watkins, V. J., & Hutchinson, A. M. (2025) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70252 · Cited by 5
A randomized controlled trial to evaluate innovative decision support in the context of fall prevention
Westerbeek, L., Linn, A. J., van Weert, H. C. P. M., van der Velde, N., Medlock, S. K., Abu–Hanna, A., & van Weert, J. C. M. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01822-9 · Cited by 5
Beyond Oncology: Question Prompt Lists in Healthcare—A Scoping Review Protocol
Lukasczik, M., Gerlich, C., Wolf, H. D., & Vogel, H. (2020) · Methods and Protocols · doi:10.3390/mps3010009 · Cited by 5
Shared decision-making among non-physician healthcare professionals: Enhancing patient involvement in women’s reproductive health in community healthcare settings
Meier, S., Kasting, M. L., Liu, S. S., & DeMaria, A. L. (2021) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.032 · Cited by 5
Decision‐making styles of patients and general population in health care: A scoping review
Danya, H., & Nakayama, K. (2022) · Nursing Forum · doi:10.1111/nuf.12775 · Cited by 5
Patients’ satisfaction with local and general anaesthesia for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery—results of the first randomized controlled trial PASSAT
Galetin, T., Eckermann, C., Defosse, J., Kraja, O., Lopez‐Pastorini, A., Merres, J., Koryllos, A., & Stoelben, E. (2023) · European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezad046 · Cited by 5
Preliminary Testing of A Web-Based Lung Cancer Screening Decision Coaching Tool for Older Chinese American Smokers and Their Providers
Li, C., Matthews, A. K., Gao, X., & Cheung, K. (2023) · Journal of the National Medical Association · doi:10.1016/j.jnma.2023.01.009 · Cited by 5
Shared decision-making between paediatric haematologists, children with sickle cell disease and their parents: an exploratory study
Wijngaarde, R., Koning, M., Fijnvandraat, K., & Ubbink, D. T. (2023) · European Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1007/s00431-023-05280-x · Cited by 5
Qualitative Analysis of Patient Decisional Needs for Medications to Treat Heart Failure
Turgeon, R. D., Fernando, S., Bains, M., Code, J., Hawkins, N. M., Koshman, S. L., Straatman, L., Toma, M., Virani, S., MacDonald, B. J., et al. (2024) · Circulation Heart Failure · doi:10.1161/circheartfailure.123.011445 · Cited by 5
Training Undergraduate Medical Students in Shared Decision Making: A Systematic Review
Shrivastava, S. R., Shrivastava, P. S., Bankar, N. J., Bandre, G. R., & Mishra, V. H. (2024) · Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences · doi:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1231_23 · Cited by 5
Shared decision making for patients with kidney failure to improve end‐of‐life care: Development of the DESIRE intervention
Buur, L. E., Bekker, H., Søndergaard, H., Kannegaard, M., Madsen, J. K., Khatir, D. S., & Finderup, J. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.17209 · Cited by 5
Exploring the decisional needs of patients living with subacromial pain syndrome: A qualitative needs assessment study
Bengtsen, S. C., Zadro, J. R., Rathleff, M. S., Foster, N. E., Thomsen, J. L., Olesen, J. L., Søndergaard, J., & Lyng, K. D. (2025) · Musculoskeletal Science and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2025.103255 · Cited by 6
Development of a clinical decision-support tool for management of adolescent knee pain (The MAP-Knee tool)
Riel, H., Bruun, M. K., Djurtoft, C., Jensen, M. B., Kaalund, S., van Leeuwen, G. J., Overgaard, C., Rahbek, O., & Rathleff, M. S. (2025) · Musculoskeletal Science and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2025.103293 · Cited by 5
A cross-sectional study on colorectal cancer screening knowledge and barriers among university students
Ahmed, H. A. A., Albagawi, B. S., AboZayed, A., Yousef, A., Marzouk, M. M., Alenezi, I. N., Almowafy, A. A., & Shiba, H. A. A. (2025) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-22510-z · Cited by 6
Lernbedarf von PraktikerInnen der Logopädie, Ergotherapie und Physiotherapie für evidenzbasiertes Arbeiten - Querschnittsstudie
Schubert, A. (2019) · Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen · doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2019.02.003 · Cited by 5
Learning person-centred consultation skills in clinical medicine: A randomised controlled case study
Louw, M., & Hugo, J. F. M. (2020) · South African Family Practice · doi:10.4102/safp.v62i1.5109 · Cited by 5
Shared Medical Decision-Making and Patient-Centered Collaboration
Ghosh, A., & Ahmed, S. (2021) · Studies in systems, decision and control · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-9612-4_10 · Cited by 5
Decision‐making regarding oral nutritional supplements for nursing home residents with advanced dementia: A cross‐sectional pilot study
Kramer, M. V. H. ‐., Perry, S. I. B., Lodewijks, E., Vasse, E., & de van der Schueren, M. A. E. (2021) · Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1111/jhn.12955 · Cited by 5
Consent and parental responsibility - the past, the present and the future
Keshtgar, A., Hania, M., & Sharif, M. O. (2022) · BDJ · doi:10.1038/s41415-022-3877-7 · Cited by 5
Prediction Algorithm of Labor Employment Capacity and Structure Based on Improved Genetic Algorithm
Shen, C. (2022) · Mobile Information Systems · doi:10.1155/2022/5266039 · Cited by 5
Moving shared decision-making forward in Iran
Rahimi, S. A., Nguyen, N. P., Alizadeh, M., & Poenaru, D. (2022) · Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen · doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2022.05.001 · Cited by 5
Recommendations of high-quality clinical practice guidelines related to the process of starting dialysis: A systematic review
Salas-Gama, K., Onakpoya, I., Daza, J. A. C., Perera, R., & Heneghan, C. J. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0266202 · Cited by 5
The precarity of patient participation - a qualitative interview study of experiences from the acute stroke and rehabilitation journey
Sivertsen, M., Jaegher, H. D., Alstadhaug, K. B., Arntzen, E. C., & Normann, B. (2022) · Physiotherapy Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/09593985.2022.2140319 · Cited by 5
Canadian Older Adults’ Intention to Use an Electronic Decision Aid for Housing Decisions: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey
Fakhfakh, M., Blanchette, V., Plourde, K. V., Gadio, S., Elf, M., Jones, C. A., Meijering, L., Giguere, A. M. C., & Légaré, F. (2022) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/43106 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
Decisional Conflict and Knowledge Among Patients With Varicocele Seeking Treatment for Infertility
Jayadevan, R., Amighi, A., Mills, S. A., Almuzeni, A. A., Nork, J., Pollard, M. E., Kwan, L. C., Eleswarapu, S. V., & Mills, J. N. (2020) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2020.05.014 · Cited by 5
Supporting Communication of Shared Decision-Making Principles in US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations
Eder, M. L., Ivlev, I., & Lin, J. S. (2021) · MDM Policy & Practice · doi:10.1177/23814683211067522 · Cited by 5
[Retracted] Research on Reconstruction of Basketball Training Action Trajectory Based on Improved K‐Means Clustering Algorithm
Peng, Y., & Gao, W. (2022) · Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1155/2022/9531266 · Cited by 4
Retracted
Development of the IcanSDM scale to assess primary care clinicians’ ability to adopt shared decision-makingPreprint
Giguere, A. M. C., Bogza, L.-M., Coudert, L., Carmichael, P., Renaud, J., Légaré, F., Lindig, A., & Voyer, P. (2020) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-19647/v1 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
The Person-Centred Clinical Interview
Sensky, T. (2024) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000539055 · Cited by 5
Shared Decision-Making Training in Family Medicine Residency: A Scoping Review
Wattanapisit, A., Nicolle, E., & Ratnapalan, S. (2024) · Korean Journal of Family Medicine · doi:10.4082/kjfm.23.0273 · Cited by 4
Challenges and Future Directions Biomaterial-Based Additive Manufacturing in Tissue Engineering and Regeneration
Gholap, A. D., Khuspe, P. R., Mane, D. V., Galave, V., Mali, A., Mohite, P. B., Puri, A. V., & Uddin, J. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-96070-3_16 · Cited by 4
Breast Cancer Basics: Understanding the Disease and Its Challenges
Mutthuraj, D., Brunda, M., Sajana, M., & Basalingappa, K. M. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-3682-5_2 · Cited by 4
Key targets for activating anaesthesia shared decision‐making: a mixed methods systematic review
Madhani, A., Suarez, N., & Finlay, K. A. (2026) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/anae.70164 · Cited by 4
Ethics of Nudging in the COVID-19 Crisis and the Necessary Return to the Principles of Shared Decision Making: A Critical Review
Junger, N., & Hirsch, O. (2024) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.57960 · Cited by 6
Clinical Communication
Salmon, P. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009343152 · Cited by 3
Surgical decision-making regarding hearing and ear reconstruction in craniofacial microsomia: Exploring caregiver narratives
Stock, N. M., Herring, B., Magee, L., Johns, A. L., Crerand, C. E., Heike, C. L., Schefer, A., Drake, A. F., Tumblin, M., & Feragen, K. B. (2025) · Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2025.01.019 · Cited by 4
Development and validation of a physician dialogic risk communication instrument scale in Chinese online medical consultations on cancer treatment risks
Lu, W., Yorke, J., Li, Y., Lam, W., Li, M., Hu, Y., & Ngai, C. S. B. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-04758-3 · Cited by 4
A scoping review protocol of evidence-based guidance and guidelines published by general practitioner professional organisations
O’Brien, E., Clyne, B., Smith, S. M., O’Herlihy, N., Harkins, V., & Wallace, E. (2021) · HRB Open Research · doi:10.12688/hrbopenres.13268.1 · Cited by 12
Adaptação transcultural e validação da Decisional Conflict Scale para utilização no Brasil
Antunes, C. M. T. B., Bampi, L. N. D. S., Filho, F. M. D. A., & Hua, F. Y. (2021) · Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde · doi:10.25248/reas.e9136.2021 · Cited by 4
Current Trends in Interprofessional Shared Decision-Making Programmes in Health Professions Education: A Scoping Review
Sultan, L., Alsaywid, B. S., de Jong, N., & de Nooijer, J. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142013157 · Cited by 6
Practising in a post-truth world: Pandemic ethics can inform patient autonomy and clinical communication
Fabian, J., Etheredge, H. R., Lundgren, C., & Brannigan, L. (2022) · South African Medical Journal · doi:10.7196/samj.2023.v113i1.16746 · Cited by 4
The Costs of Implementing a Conversation Aid for Uterine Fibroids in Multiple Health Care Settings
Acquilano, S. C., Forcino, R. C., Schubbe, D. C., Engel, J., Tomaino, M., Johnson, L. C., Durand, M., & Elwyn, G. J. (2023) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0000000000001897 · Cited by 4
Self-citation
Real-time monitoring and feedback to improve shared decision-making for surgery (the ALPACA Study): protocol for a mixed-methods study to inform co-development of an inclusive intervention
Hoffmann, C., AVERY, K. N. L., Macefield, R. C., Snelgrove, V., Blazeby, J. M., Hopkins, D., Hickey, S., Cabral, C., Hall, J., Gibbison, B., et al. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079155 · Cited by 4
Assessing the educational quality of shared decision-making interventions for residents: A systematic review
Spinnewijn, L., Scheele, F., Braat, D. D. M., & Aarts, J. W. M. (2024) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2024.108187 · Cited by 4
Usability of an Automated System for Real-Time Monitoring of Shared Decision-Making for Surgery: Mixed Methods Evaluation
Hoffmann, C., AVERY, K. N. L., Macefield, R. C., Dvořák, T., Snelgrove, V., Blazeby, J. M., Hopkins, D., Hickey, S., Gibbison, B., Rooshenas, L., et al. (2024) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/46698 · Cited by 5
Promoting Lung Cancer Screen Decision-Making and Early Detection Behaviors
Lin, X., Lei, F., Lin, J., Li, Y., Chen, Q., Arbing, R. H. A., Chen, W., & Huang, F. (2024) · Cancer Nursing · doi:10.1097/ncc.0000000000001334 · Cited by 4
Effectiveness of interventions to enhance shared decision‐making in wound care: A systematic review
Clemett, V. J., Graham, T., Woodward, S., & Grocott, P. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.17118 · Cited by 4
On being on the same page: Predictors of gastroenterologist-patient misalignment in inflammatory bowel disease
Karimi, N., Moore, A. R., Jones, A., Lukin, A., Pipicella, J. L., Williams, A., Ng, W., Kanazaki, R., Kariyawasam, V. C., Mitrev, N., et al. (2024) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2024.108487 · Cited by 4
Shared decision‐making about autologous stem cell transplantation: A qualitative study of older patients and physicians
Liu, Q., Li, J., Wang, L., Shan, C., Wang, L., Ye, D., Luo, D., Zou, H., Yang, B. X., Wang, X. Q., et al. (2024) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.19276 · Cited by 4
Factors Influencing Patient-Centered Care and Shared Decision-Making in Primary Care Settings in Saudi Arabia: A Scoping Review
Alfattani, M. A., Bakudam, W. A., & Alharbi, W. (2024) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.76142 · Cited by 4
Do We Have Sufficient Evidence to Derive Innovative Approaches to Assessing Unmet Need, Delivering Education on Bladder and Bowel Continence Health, and Providing a Better Environment for Joint Decision‐Making? ICI‐RS 2024
Cotterill, N., Samarinas, M., Rantell, A., Selai, C. E., Arlandis, S., Jones, K., Abrams, P., Robinson, D., & Wagg, A. (2025) · Neurourology and Urodynamics · doi:10.1002/nau.25654 · Cited by 4
Avoid a Blind Spot by Engaging Patients as Collaborators in Evidence-based Care
Fowler, C., Edmonds, S. W., & Cullen, L. (2025) · Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.jopan.2024.07.004 · Cited by 4
Web-Based Training for Nurses on Shared Decision Making and Prenatal Screening for Down Syndrome: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
Herron, A. P., Agbadjé, T. T., Côté, M., Djade, C. D., Roch, G., Rousseau, F., & Légaré, F. (2020) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/17878 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Validity and reliability of the Iranian preterm birth experiences and satisfaction scale: A methodological and cross-sectional study
Najjarzadeh, M., Mohammad‐Alizadeh‐Charandabi, S., Abbasalizadeh, S., Jafarabadi, M. A., Mirghafourvand‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬, M., Tagipour-Amidi, N., Sawyer, A., & Ayers, S. (2021) · Health Promotion Perspectives · doi:10.34172/hpp.2021.13 · Cited by 4
Communication for Medicine: State-of-the-Art
Skelton, J. R., & Richards, C. (2021) · ESP Today · doi:10.18485/esptoday.2021.9.1.1 · Cited by 4
Assessment of Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility on NCI-Designated Cancer Center Websites
Paige, S. R., Salloum, R. G., & Carter‐Harris, L. (2021) · Journal of Cancer Education · doi:10.1007/s13187-021-02051-w · Cited by 4
Which has more influence on a family's assessment of the quality of dying of their long-term care resident with dementia: Frequency of symptoms or quality of communication with healthcare team?
Charest-Drapeau, O., Provencher, V., Trottier, L., Léonard, G., Wilchesky, M., & Bravo, G. (2022) · Palliative & Supportive Care · doi:10.1017/s1478951522000323 · Cited by 4
Reach in a Pragmatic Hypertension Trial: A Critical Re-Aim Component
JaKa, M. M., Bergdall, A. R., Beran, M. S., Solberg, L. I., Green, B. B., Andersen, J. A., Kodet, A. J., Norman, S., Haugen, P. K., Crain, L. A., et al. (2022) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2022.106896 · Cited by 4
A Comparison between Perceptions of Psychiatric Outpatients and Psychiatrists Regarding Benzodiazepine Use and Decision Making for Its Discontinuation: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Japan
Aoki, Y., Takeshima, M., Tsuboi, T., Katsumoto, E., Udagawa, K., Inada, K., Watanabe, K., Mishima, K., & Takaesu, Y. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20075373 · Cited by 4
Talking, not training, increased the accuracy of physicians’ diagnosis of their patients’ preferences for colon cancer screening
Valentine, K., Leavitt, L., Simmons, L. H., Sepucha, K., Atlas, S. J., Korsen, N., Han, P. K. J., & Fairfield, K. M. (2023) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2023.108047 · Cited by 4
Impact of Tobacco Dependence in Risk Prediction Models for Lung Cancer Diagnoses and Deaths
Ward, R. C., Tanner, N. T., Silvestri, G. A., & Gebregziabher, M. (2019) · JNCI Cancer Spectrum · doi:10.1093/jncics/pkz014 · Cited by 4
Patients' perceptions on shared decision making during prescription of subcutaneous biological drug treatments for inflammatory arthritis: The RHEU‐LIFE survey
Santos, F. J. D. T., González, C. M., Cea‐Calvo, L., Arteaga, M. J. S., Fernández, S., Carmona, L., & Otón, T. (2020) · Musculoskeletal Care · doi:10.1002/msc.1499 · Cited by 5
Commentary: Improving the Sustainability of Healthcare in Canada through Physician-Engaged Delivery System Reforms
Quinn, A. E., & Manns, B. (2021) · Healthcare policy · doi:10.12927/hcpol.2021.26434 · Cited by 4
Tools and Strategies to Integrate Multi-Domain Information for Personalized Decision-Making in Oncological Care Pathways: A Scoping Review
Uittenhout, T. M., Jansen, J., Jie, K. G., Welling, L., van Leeuwen, B. L., van Bodegom‐Vos, L., Stiggelbout, A. M., & van der Weijden, T. (2024) · Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s460499 · Cited by 3
Physicians’ and patients’ perceived risks of chronic pain medication and co-medications in Quebec, Canada: a cross-sectional study
Clifford‐Faugère, G. D., Lacasse, A., Nguefack, H. L. N., Godbout-Parent, M., Boulanger, A., & Julien, N. (2025) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-025-02704-5 · Cited by 6
Development and preliminary evaluation of a decision coach training module for nurses in Norway
Kienlin, S. M., Nytrøen, K., Kasper, J., & Stacey, D. (2025) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-024-02569-6 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Development of a generic decision guide for patients in oncology: a qualitative interview study
Schilling, L., Kaden, J., Bán, I., Berger‐Höger, B., & on behalf of the TARGET group (2025) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-025-02960-6 · Cited by 3
Factors Influencing the Implementation of Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia in Residential Aged-Care Homes: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: A systematic review
Ayeno, H. D., Kassie, G. M., Atee, M., & Nguyen, T. A. (2025) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/cl2.70029 · Cited by 5
Shared-decision making in pancreatic cancer: A scoping review
Quinn, P. L., Saiyed, S., & Ejaz, A. M. (2025) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2025.108828 · Cited by 3
Initial co-ideation phase of a shared decision-making tool aimed at promoting physical activity in primary care: views expressed by patients, academics, and healthcare professionals
Ramírez-Durán, M. D. V., Prieto-López, L., Rodríguez, C. A., García-Ramos, A., Monge-Martín, D., Gómez-Salgado, J. C., & Coronado‐Vázquez, V. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1483035 · Cited by 3
User Experiences of Limb-Worn Wearable Devices for Monitoring Parkinson Disease Motor Function and Blood Pressure: Usability Study
Kenny, L., Sica, M., Crowe, C., O’Mahony, L., O’Flynn, B., Mueller, D. S., Tedesco, S. A., Barton, J. J., & Timmons, S. (2025) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/73423 · Cited by 3
When Diagnosis Becomes Identity: Navigating the Cultural Inflation of Psychiatric Diagnoses in Nursing Practice
Petreca, V. G., Barros, J. T., & Harding, S. (2025) · Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association · doi:10.1177/10783903251404481 · Cited by 4
ENGAGE: Analyzing the value of virtual reality in a patient-centric immersive learning program in myasthenia gravis for healthcare professionals
Weisshardt, I., Acosta, C. R., Chauhan, T., Haralampiev, K., Mušura, A., Rodriguez, A., Foss, A., Pinto, A. A., Hewamadduma, C., Vissing, J., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2025.1655351 · Cited by 3
Patients’ attitudes and intentions towards taking medical advice for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a theory of planned behaviour analysis
Krejany, C., Kanjo, E., Gaedtke, L., Chakera, A., & Jiwa, M. (2021) · Endocrine · doi:10.1007/s12020-021-02771-5 · Cited by 3

Authors: Légaré, F., Adekpedjou, R., Stacey, D., Turcotte, S., Kryworuchko, J., Graham, I. D., Lyddiatt, A., Politi, M. C., Thomson, R., Elwyn, G., & Donner-Banzhoff, N.
Affiliations: Université Laval (CA)
University of Ottawa (CA)
Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise (CA)
University of British Columbia (CA)
No affiliation; 28 Greenwood Road Ingersoll ON Canada N5C 3N1
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Newcastle University (GB)
Cochrane (GB)
University of Marburg; Department of Family Medicine / General Practice; Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 4 Marburg Germany D-35039
ORCID: Légaré, France
Adekpedjou, Rhéda
Stacey, Dawn
Turcotte, Stéphane
Kryworuchko, Jennifer
Graham, Ian D
Lyddiatt, Anne
Politi, Mary C
Elwyn, Glyn
Venue: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 2018-07-19
Volume: 2018
Issue: 7
Pages: CD006732-CD006732
ISSN: 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
1465-1858
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006732.pub4
PMC: PMC6513543
OpenAlex: W2884603128
Cited by: 698
References: 205
Citations by year: 2026: 34 · 2025: 120 · 2024: 124 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 8
FWCI: 10.20
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Locations: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics: Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords: shared decision-making, healthcare workers, intervention, decision aids, patient activation, patient education, patient-provider communication, decision regret, patient satisfaction, patient-reported outcomes, patient-centered care, implementation of shared decision making, multicomponent intervention, contamination risk, risk of bias, quality of evidence, patient engagement, patient participation
MeSH terms: Decision Making, Decision Support Techniques, Health Personnel, Humans, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Participation, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks