Cited by 698Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareHealth Policy Implementation SciencePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 204 of the 205 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals

Open access

Légaré, France, Adekpedjou, Rhéda, Stacey, Dawn, Turcotte, Stéphane, Kryworuchko, Jennifer, Graham, Ian D, Lyddiatt, Anne, Politi, Mary C, Thomson, Richard, Elwyn, Glyn, Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert·2018·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006732.pub4PMC PMC6513543

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is a process by which a healthcare choice is made by the patient, significant others, or both with one or more healthcare professionals. However, it has not yet been widely adopted in practice. This is the second update of this Cochrane review. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of interventions for increasing the use of SDM by healthcare professionals. We considered interventions targeting patients, interventions targeting healthcare professionals, and interventions targeting both. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and five other databases on 15 June 2017. We also searched two clinical trials registries and proceedings of relevant conferences. We checked reference lists and contacted study authors to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and non-randomized trials, controlled before-after studies and interrupted time series studies evaluating interventions for increasing the use of SDM in which the primary outcomes were evaluated using observer-based or patient-reported measures. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We included 87 studies (45,641 patients and 3113 healthcare professionals) conducted mainly in the USA, Germany, Canada and the Netherlands. Risk of bias was high or unclear for protection against contamination, low for differences in the baseline characteristics of patients, and unclear for other domains.Forty-four studies evaluated interventions targeting patients. They included decision aids, patient activation, question prompt lists and training for patients among others and were administered alone (single intervention) or in combination (multifaceted intervention). The certainty of the evidence was very low. It is uncertain if interventions targeting patients when compared with usual care increase SDM whether measured by observation (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.13 to 1.22; 4 studies; N = 424) or reported by patients (SMD 0.32, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.48; 9 studies; N = 1386; risk difference (RD) -0.09, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.01; 6 studies; N = 754), reduce decision regret (SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.19; 1 study; N = 212), improve physical (SMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.36; 1 study; N = 116) or mental health-related quality of life (QOL) (SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.46; 1 study; N = 116), affect consultation length (SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.58; 2 studies; N = 224) or cost (SMD 0.82, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.22; 1 study; N = 105).It is uncertain if interventions targeting patients when compared with interventions of the same type increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 0.88, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.37; 3 studies; N = 271) or reported by patients (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.24; 11 studies; N = 1906); (RD 0.03, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.08; 10 studies; N = 2272); affect consultation length (SMD -0.65, 95% CI -1.29 to -0.00; 1 study; N = 39) or costs. No data were reported for decision regret, physical or mental health-related QOL.Fifteen studies evaluated interventions targeting healthcare professionals. They included educational meetings, educational material, educational outreach visits and reminders among others. The certainty of evidence is very low. It is uncertain if these interventions when compared with usual care increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 0.70, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.19; 6 studies; N = 479) or reported by patients (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.20; 5 studies; N = 5772); (RD 0.01, 95%C: -0.03 to 0.06; 2 studies; N = 6303); reduce decision regret (SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.51; 1 study; N = 326), affect consultation length (SMD 0.51, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.81; 1 study, N = 175), cost (no data available) or physical health-related QOL (SMD 0.16, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.36; 1 study; N = 359). Mental health-related QOL may slightly improve (SMD 0.28, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.49; 1 study, N = 359; low-certainty evidence).It is uncertain if interventions targeting healthcare professionals compared to interventions of the same type increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD -0.30, 95% CI -1.19 to 0.59; 1 study; N = 20) or reported by patients (SMD 0.24, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.58; 2 studies; N = 1459) as the certainty of the evidence is very low. There was insufficient information to determine the effect on decision regret, physical or mental health-related QOL, consultation length or costs.Twenty-eight studies targeted both patients and healthcare professionals. The interventions used a combination of patient-mediated and healthcare professional directed interventions. Based on low certainty evidence, it is uncertain whether these interventions, when compared with usual care, increase SDM whether measured by observation (SMD 1.10, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.79; 6 studies; N = 1270) or reported by patients (SMD 0.13, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.28; 7 studies; N = 1479); (RD -0.01,

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd006732.pub4

Cites

204 of 204 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
The “Golden Age” of Probiotics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Observational Studies in Preterm Infants
Dermyshi, E., Wang, Y., Yan, C., Hong, W., Qiu, G., Gong, X., & Zhang, T. (2017) · Neonatology · doi:10.1159/000454668 · Cited by 24,586
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
Guyatt, G., Oxman, A. D., Akl, E. A., Kunz, R., Vist, G., Brozek, J., Norris, S., Falck-Ytter, Y., Glasziou, P., & deBeer, H. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026 · Cited by 10,681
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
Stacey, D., Légaré, F., Lewis, K., Barry, M. J., Bennett, C. L., Eden, K. B., Holmes-Rovner, M., Llewellyn-Thomas, H., Lyddiatt, A., Thomson, R., et al. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001431.pub5 · Cited by 6,685
Self-citation
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration
Higgins, J., Green, S. R., & Higgins, J. (2008) · Cited by 5,544
Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango)
Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. (1997) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00221-3 · Cited by 4,137 · cited 3×
“Briefly, SDM depends on knowing and understanding the best available evidence about the risks and benefits across all available options while ensuring that the patient’s values and preferences are taken into account (Charles 1997; Elwyn 1999; Towle 1999).”
Background
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials
Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & for the CONSORT Group* (2010) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232 · Cited by 3,824
Oral health of individuals aged 3-80 years in Jönköping, Sweden during 40 years (1973-2013). II. Review of clinical and radiographic findings.
Norderyd, O. M., Koch, G., Papias, A., Köhler, A. A., Helkimo, A. N., Brahm, C., Lindmark, U., Lindfors, N., Mattsson, A., Rolander, B., et al. (2015) · PubMed · Cited by 3,584
Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials
Campbell, M. K., Piaggio, G., Elbourne, D. R., Altman, D. G., & for the CONSORT Group (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e5661 · Cited by 3,510
Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies
Grimshaw, J., Thomas, R., MacLennan, G., Fraser, C., Ramsay, C., Vale, L., Whitty, P., Eccles, M., Matowe, L., Shirran, L., et al. (2004) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta8060 · Cited by 3,044

Show all 205 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

Hermansen Kobulnicky, 2002, The behavioral impact of teaching patients to monitor side effects of chemotherapy: an intervention study
LeBlanc A Egginton J Inselman J Dick S Schuerman J Branda M Dissemination and Implementation of Evidence-Based Medicine in Primary Care Through The Use of Encounter Decision Aids: The ShareEBM Pragmatic Trial. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Oral communications 2017
Simmons M ‘If I could see on a piece of paper options for treatment that would just be insane’: Shared decision making in mental health. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Posters Sessions 2017
van Veenendaal H Voogdt-Pruis H Schuurman M Visserman E Oskam J Ubbink D Implementing shared decision-making (SDM) and time-out for breast cancer patients in six Dutch Hospitals. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Posters Sessions 2017
Adekpedjou R Stacey D Brière N Freitas A Garvelink M Turcotte S Improving the decision-making process with caregivers of elderly people about housing options: a cluster randomised trial. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Oral communications 2017
Dwinger S Gschwendtner K Müller N Bieber C Härter M Bergelt C Development and pilot testing of a face-to-face SDM coaching intervention for oncologists. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Oral communications 2017
Finderup J Dam Jensen JK Lomborg K Developing and pilot testing a shared decision-making intervention for dialysis choice. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Oral communications 2017
Henselmans H van Laarhoven HWM de Haes HCJM Tokat M Engelhardt EG van Maarschalkerweerd P Effect of a Skills Training for oncologists on shared decision making about palliative chemotherapy in simulated encounters. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Posters Sessions 2017
Lifford K Burton M Armitage F Collins K Reed M Wyld L Bridging the Age Gap trial of decision support interventions for older women with breast cancer: Preliminary process evaluation. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Posters Sessions 2017
Ludden T Taylor Y Kuhn L McWilliams A Dulin M Tapp H “Who Made the Decision Today?” Surveying asthma patients level of shared decision making in an RCT. ISDM2015. Sydney, Australia: Joint International Shared Decision-Making and International Society for Evidence-Based Health Care Conference 2015
Simmons L Meyer C Marques F Leavitt L Sepucha K Skills training for shared decision making: a randomized pilot study. ISDM2017. Lyon, France: 9th International Shared Decision Making Conference. Book of Abstract, Oral communications 2017
Coulter A Engaging patients in their healthcare. How is the UK doing relative to other countries? Oxford: Picker Institute Europe 2006
Cochrane Effective Practice Organisation of Care (EPOC) What study designs should be included in an EPOC review? EPOC resources for review authors, 2017 Available at: http://epoc.cochrane.org/resources/epoc-resources-review-authors
Cochrane Effective Practice Organisation of Care (EPOC) Data collection form. EPOC Resources for review authors, 2017 Available at: http://epoc.cochrane.org/resources/epoc-resources-review-authors
Cochrane Effective Practice Organisation of Care (EPOC) Suggested risk of bias criteria for EPOC reviews. EPOC Resources for review authors, 2017 http://epoc.cochrane.org/resources/epoc-resources-review-authors
Cochrane Effective Practice Organisation of Care (EPOC) EPOC worksheets for preparing a Summary of Findings (SoF) table using GRADE. EPOC Resources for review authors, 2017 Available at: http://epoc.cochrane.org/resources/epoc-resources-review-authors
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2013, The Global Burden of Disease: Generating Evidence, Guiding Policy
Schünemann HJ Oxman AD Vist GE Higgins JPT Deeks JJ Glasziou P et al. Chapter 12: Interpreting results drawing conclusions. In: Higgins JPT Green S (editors) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from http://training.cochrane.org/handbook
Shafir, 2012, Shared Decision Making: Advancing Patient-Centered Care through State and Federal Implementation, 1

Sorted by citations

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021.
Evans, L., Rhodes, A., Alhazzani, W., Antonelli, M., Coopersmith, C. M., French, C., Machado, F. R., Mcintyre, L., Ostermann, M., Prescott, H. C., et al. (2021) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000005337 · Cited by 2,935
2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines
Ommen, S. R., Ho, C. Y., Asif, I. M., Balaji, S., Burke, M. A., Day, S. M., Dearani, J. A., Epps, K. C., Evanovich, L., Ferrari, V. A., et al. (2024) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001250 · Cited by 807
2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Ommen, S. R., Mital, S., Burke, M. A., Day, S. M., Deswal, A., Elliott, P., Evanovich, L. L., Hung, J., Joglar, J. A., Kantor, P., et al. (2020) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.045 · Cited by 643
2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Ommen, S. R., Mital, S. R., Burke, M. A., Day, S. M., Deswal, A. M., Elliot, P. M., Evanovich, L. L., Hung, J., Joglar, J. A., Kantor, P. F., et al. (2020) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000937 · Cited by 641
2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Ommen, S. R., Ho, C. Y., Asif, I. M., Balaji, S., Burke, M. A., Day, S. M., Dearani, J. A., Epps, K., Evanovich, L., Ferrari, V. A., et al. (2024) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.02.014 · Cited by 425
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
Stacey, D., Lewis, K. B., Smith, M., Carley, M. E., Volk, R. J., Douglas, E. E., Pacheco‐Brousseau, L., Finderup, J., Gunderson, J., Barry, M. J., et al. (2024) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001431.pub6 · Cited by 416
Self-citation
Barriers and facilitators of pediatric shared decision-making: a systematic review
Boland, L., Graham, I. D., Légaré, F., Lewis, K. B., Jull, J., Shephard, A., Lawson, M. L., Davis, A., Yameogo, A., & Stacey, D. (2019) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0851-5 · Cited by 383
Self-citation
Care for low back pain: can health systems deliver?
Traeger, A., Buchbinder, R., Elshaug, A., Croft, P., & Maher, C. (2019) · Bulletin of the World Health Organizatino · doi:10.2471/blt.18.226050 · Cited by 243
The Engaged Patient: The Relevance of Patient–Physician Communication for Twenty-First-Century Health
Timmermans, S. (2020) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.1177/0022146520943514 · Cited by 227
Shared Decision-Making and Cardiovascular Health: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
Himmelfarb, C. D., Beckie, T. M., Allen, L. A., Commodore-Mensah, Y. Y., Davidson, P. M., Lin, G. A., Lutz, B. J., & Spatz, E. S. (2023) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001162 · Cited by 173
Shared decision making: What is the work?
Elwyn, G. J. (2020) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.032 · Cited by 181
Self-citation
The impact and utility of encounter patient decision aids: Systematic review, meta-analysis and narrative synthesis
Scalia, P., Durand, M., Berkowitz, J. L., Ramesh, N., Faber, M. J., Kremer, J. A. M., & Elwyn, G. J. (2018) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.020 · Cited by 164
Self-citation
2021 PACES Expert Consensus Statement on the Indications and Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients
Shah, M. J., Silka, M. J., Silva, J. N. A., Balaji, S., Beach, C. M., Benjamin, M. N., Berul, C. I., Cannon, B. C., Cecchin, F., Cohen, M. I., et al. (2021) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.07.038 · Cited by 155
Empowering Precision Medicine: The Impact of 3D Printing on Personalized Therapeutic
Alzoubi, L., Aljabali, A. A. A., & Tambuwala, M. M. (2023) · AAPS PharmSciTech · doi:10.1208/s12249-023-02682-w · Cited by 166
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021
Evans, L., Rhodes, A., Alhazzani, W., Antonelli, M., Coopersmith, C. M., French, C., Machado, F. R., Mcintyre, L., Ostermann, M., Prescott, H. C., et al. (2021) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y · Cited by 5,082
Shared Decision Making: Improving Patient Outcomes by Understanding the Benefits of and Barriers to Effective Communication
Faiman, B. M., & Tariman, J. D. (2019) · Clinical journal of oncology nursing · doi:10.1188/19.cjon.540-542 · Cited by 125
Shared decision making and physical therapy: What, when, how, and why?
Hoffmann, T., Bakhit, M., & Michaleff, Z. A. (2022) · Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.100382 · Cited by 116
Co-Producing and Co-Designing
Robert, G., Locock, L., Williams, O., Cornwell, J., Donetto, S., & Goodrich, J. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009237024 · Cited by 114
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions
Aoki, Y., Yaju, Y., Utsumi, T., Sanyaolu, L. N., Storm, M., Takaesu, Y., Watanabe, K., Watanabe, N., Duncan, E., & Edwards, A. (2022) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007297.pub3 · Cited by 114
Navigating end-of-life decision-making in nursing: a systematic review of ethical challenges and palliative care practices
Alanazi, M. A., Shaban, M. M., Ramadan, O. M. E., Mohammed, H. H., Mohammed, H. H., Amer, F. G. M., & Shaban, M. (2024) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-024-02087-5 · Cited by 97
What are women’s mode of birth preferences and why? A systematic scoping review
Coates, D., Thirukumar, P., Spear, V., Brown, G. A., & Henry, A. (2019) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2019.09.005 · Cited by 103
2020 AHA/ACC guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Ommen, S. R., Mital, S. R., Burke, M. A., Day, S. M., Deswal, A. M., Elliot, P. M., Evanovich, L. L., Hung, J., Joglar, J. A., Kantor, P. F., et al. (2021) · Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.04.001 · Cited by 92
Strategies to evaluate healthcare provider trainings in shared decision-making (SDM): a systematic review of evaluation studies
Müller, E., Strukava, A., Scholl, I., Härter, M. C., Diouf, N. T., Légaré, F., & Buchholz, A. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026488 · Cited by 84
Self-citation
General practitioners’ accounts of negotiating antibiotic prescribing decisions with patients: a qualitative study on what influences antibiotic prescribing in low, medium and high prescribing practices
van der Zande, M. M., Dembinsky, M., Aresi, G., & van Staa, T. P. (2019) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-019-1065-x · Cited by 84
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Patient Decision Aids for Socially Disadvantaged Populations: Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS)
Yen, R. W., Smith, J., Engel, J., Muscat, D. M., Smith, S. K., Mancini, J., Perestelo‐Pérez, L., Elwyn, G. J., O’Malley, A. J., Leyenaar, J. K., et al. (2021) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x211020317 · Cited by 82
Self-citation
When western concept meets eastern culture: Exploring the impact of Confucianism on shared decision-making in China
Meng, M., Li, X., Zhao, J., & Hao, Y. (2024) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100586 · Cited by 79
Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions
Jull, J., Köpke, S., Smith, M., Carley, M., Finderup, J., Rahn, A. C., Boland, L., Dunn, S., Dwyer, A. A., Kasper, J., et al. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd013385.pub2 · Cited by 82
Self-citation
Principles for Patient and Family Partnership in Care: An American College of Physicians Position Paper
Nickel, W. K., Weinberger, S. E., & Guze, P. A. (2018) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m18-0018 · Cited by 84
Nurse-led coaching of shared decision-making for women with ductal carcinoma in situ in breast care centers: A cluster randomized controlled trial
Berger‐Höger, B., Liethmann, K., Mühlhauser, I., Haastert, B., & Steckelberg, A. (2019) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.01.013 · Cited by 78
Effect of a Skills Training for Oncologists and a Patient Communication Aid on Shared Decision Making About Palliative Systemic Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Henselmans, I., van Laarhoven, H. W. M., van Maarschalkerweerd, P. E. A., de Haes, J. C. J. M., Dijkgraaf, M. G. W., Sommeijer, D. W., Ottevanger, P. B., Fiebrich, H., Dohmen, S. E., Creemers, G., et al. (2019) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0453 · Cited by 82
2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients
Shah, M. J., Silka, M. J., Silva, J. N. A., Balaji, S., Beach, C. M., Benjamin, M. N., Berul, C. I., Cannon, B. C., Cecchin, F., Cohen, M. I., et al. (2021) · Cardiology in the Young · doi:10.1017/s1047951121003413 · Cited by 78
Optimising GPs’ communication of advice to facilitate patients’ self-care and prompt follow-up when the diagnosis is uncertain: a realist review of ‘safety-netting’ in primary care
Smith, C. F., Lunn, H., Wong, G., & Nicholson, B. D. (2022) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014529 · Cited by 76
Making shared decision-making (SDM) a reality: protocol of a large-scale long-term SDM implementation programme at a Northern German University Hospital
Danner, M., Geiger, F., Wehkamp, K., Rueffer, J. U., Kuch, C., Sundmacher, L., Skjelbakken, T., Rummer, A., Novelli, A., Debrouwere, M., et al. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037575 · Cited by 71
Shared decision‐making interventions: An overview and a meta‐analysis of their impact on vaccine uptake
Scalia, P., Durand, M., & Elwyn, G. J. (2021) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/joim.13405 · Cited by 70
Self-citation
Mitigating cognitive biases in clinical decision-making through multi-agent conversations using large language models: simulation study
Ke, Y., Yang, R., Lie, S. A., Lim, T. X. Y., Ning, Y., Li, I., Abdullah, H. R., Ting, D. S. W., & Liu, N. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/59439 · Cited by 64
“This facilitates learning in a controlled, educational environment [25,26].”
Big data analysis for decision-making processes: challenges and opportunities for the management of health-care organizations
Fanelli, S., Pratici, L., Salvatore, F. P., Donelli, C. C., & Zangrandi, A. (2022) · Management Research Review · doi:10.1108/mrr-09-2021-0648 · Cited by 64
AI support for ethical decision-making around resuscitation: proceed with care
Biller-Andorno, N., Ferrario, A., Joebges, S., Krones, T., Massini, F., Barth, P., Arampatzis, G., & Krauthammer, M. (2022) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106786 · Cited by 67
Shared Decision Making in Cardiac Electrophysiology Procedures and Arrhythmia Management
Chung, M. K., Fagerlin, A., Wang, P. J., Ajayi, T. B., Allen, L. A., Baykaner, T., Benjamin, E. J., Branda, M. E., Cavanaugh, K. L., Chen, L. Y., et al. (2021) · Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology · doi:10.1161/circep.121.007958 · Cited by 64
Self-citation
The effects of shared decision making on health outcomes, health care quality, cost, and consultation time: An umbrella review
Bruch, J. D., Khazen, M., Mahmić-Kaknjo, M., Légaré, F., & Ellen, M. (2024) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2024.108408 · Cited by 73
Self-citation
Implementing models of care for musculoskeletal conditions in health systems to support value-based care
Speerin, R., Needs, C., Chua, J., Woodhouse, L. J., Nordin, M. C., McGlasson, R. A., & Briggs, A. M. (2020) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1016/j.berh.2020.101548 · Cited by 66
Induction of labour: Experiences of care and decision-making of women and clinicians
Coates, D., Goodfellow, A. M., & Sinclair, L. (2019) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2019.06.002 · Cited by 61
Generalized shared decision making approaches and patient problems. Adapting AHRQ’s SHARE Approach for Purposeful SDM
Hargraves, I. G., Fournier, A. K., Montori, V. M., & Bierman, A. S. (2020) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.022 · Cited by 63
Shared decision-making in palliative cancer care: A systematic review and metasynthesis
Rabben, J., Vivat, B., Fossum, M., & Rohde, G. E. (2024) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/02692163241238384 · Cited by 59
Strategies to facilitate shared decision‐making in long‐term care
Cranley, L. A., Slaughter, S. E., Caspar, S., Heisey, M., Huang, M. C., Killackey, T., & McGilton, K. S. (2020) · International Journal of Older People Nursing · doi:10.1111/opn.12314 · Cited by 55
Toward an Ecologically Valid Conceptual Framework for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Settings: Need for Systems Thinking, Accountability, Decision-making, Trust, and Patient Safety Considerations in Safeguarding the Technology and Clinicians
Choudhury, A. (2022) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/35421 · Cited by 56
Shared decision making in cardiology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Mitropoulou, P., Grüner‐Hegge, N., Reinhold, J., & Papadopoulou, C. (2022) · Heart · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321050 · Cited by 54
Educational programs to teach shared decision making to medical trainees: A systematic review
Ospina, N. S., Toloza, F. J. K., Barrera, F. J., Bylund, C. L., Erwin, P. J., & Montori, V. M. (2020) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2019.12.016 · Cited by 54
Shared decision making for adults with severe mental illness: A concept analysis
Aoki, Y. (2020) · Japan Journal of Nursing Science · doi:10.1111/jjns.12365 · Cited by 51
Towards a taxonomy of behavior change techniques for promoting shared decision making
Agbadjé, T. T., Elidor, H., Perin, M. S., Adekpedjou, R., & Légaré, F. (2020) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-020-01015-w · Cited by 52
Self-citation
“I’m Putting My Trust in Their Hands”
Golden, S. E., Ono, S. S., Thakurta, S., Wiener, R. S., Iaccarino, J. M., Melzer, A. C., Datta, S., & Slatore, C. G. (2020) · CHEST Journal · doi:10.1016/j.chest.2020.02.072 · Cited by 51
Shared decision making in breast cancer treatment guidelines: Development of a quality assessment tool and a systematic review
Maes‐Carballo, M., Muñoz‐Núñez, I., Martín‐Díaz, M., Mignini, L. E., Bueno‐Cavanillas, A., & Khan, K. S. (2020) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13112 · Cited by 50
Shared Decision-Making for a Dialysis Modality
Yu, X., Nakayama, M., Wu, K., Kim, Y.-L., Mushahar, L., Szeto, C., Schatell, D., Finkelstein, F. O., Quinn, R. R., & Duddington, M. (2021) · Kidney International Reports · doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2021.10.019 · Cited by 50
Evaluation of a shared decision-making intervention for dialysis choice at four Danish hospitals: a qualitative study of patient perspective
Finderup, J., Jensen, J. D., & Lomborg, K. E. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029090 · Cited by 50
2021 PACES Expert Consensus Statement on the Indications and Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients
Shah, M. J., Silka, M. J., Silva, J. N. A., Balaji, S., Beach, C. M., Benjamin, M. N., Berul, C. I., Cannon, B. C., Cecchin, F., Cohen, M. I., et al. (2021) · JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2021.07.009 · Cited by 49
Training Interventions to Equip Health Care Professionals With Shared Decision-Making Skills: A Systematic Scoping Review
Coates, D., & Clerke, T. (2020) · Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · doi:10.1097/ceh.0000000000000289 · Cited by 49
The Patient's Perspective on Shared Decision-Making in Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study
Nijhuis, F. A. P., van den Heuvel, L., Bloem, B. R., Post, B., & Meinders, M. J. (2019) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.00896 · Cited by 48
Choice of dialysis modality: patients’ experiences and quality of decision after shared decision-making
Finderup, J., Lomborg, K. E., Jensen, J. D., & Stacey, D. (2020) · BMC Nephrology · doi:10.1186/s12882-020-01956-w · Cited by 48
Self-citation
Postoperative outcomes in older patients living with frailty and multimorbidity in the UK: SNAP-3, a snapshot observational study
Swarbrick, C. J., Williams, K., Evans, B., Blake, H. A., Poulton, T. E., Nava, S., Shah, A., Martin, P., Partridge, J. S. L., & Moppett, I. K. (2025) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2025.04.026 · Cited by 61
Decision Support Strategies for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: Less Is More
Sepucha, K., Bedair, H. S., Yu, L., Dorrwachter, J. M., Dwyer, M. K., Talmo, C. T., Vo, H., & Freiberg, A. A. (2019) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.19.00004 · Cited by 46
Trends, challenges, and priorities for shared decision making in mental health: The first umbrella review
Chmielowska, M., Zisman‐Ilani, Y., Saunders, R., & Pilling, S. (2023) · International Journal of Social Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/00207640221140291 · Cited by 45
The patient at the centre: evidence from 17 European integrated care programmes for persons with complex needs
Czypionka, T., Kraus, M., Reiss, M., Baltaxe, E., Roca, J., Ruths, S., Stokes, J., Struckmann, V., Haček, R. T., Zemplenyi, A. T., et al. (2020) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05917-9 · Cited by 42
Women’s experiences and satisfaction with having a cesarean birth: An integrative review
Coates, D., Thirukumar, P., & Henry, A. (2019) · Birth · doi:10.1111/birt.12478 · Cited by 41
Digital Shared Decision-Making Interventions in Mental Healthcare: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Vitger, T., Korsbek, L., Austin, S. F., Petersen, L., Nordentoft, M., & Hjorthøj, C. R. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.691251 · Cited by 42
People’s Experience of Shared Decision Making in Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis
Grenfell, J., & Soundy, A. (2022) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs12010012 · Cited by 40
Interventions to support shared decision making for medication therapy in long term conditions: A systematic review
Mathijssen, E. G. E., van den Bemt, B. J. F., van den Hoogen, F. H. J., Popa, C. D., & Vriezekolk, J. E. (2019) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.034 · Cited by 39
Women’s experiences of decision-making and attitudes in relation to induction of labour: A survey study
Coates, D., Donnolley, N. R., Foureur, M. J., & Henry, A. (2020) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2020.02.020 · Cited by 38
Rationalising medications through deprescribing
Avery, A. J., & Bell, B. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l570 · Cited by 38
Shared decision making: why the slow progress? An essay by Neal Maskrey
Maskrey, N. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l6762 · Cited by 37
Decision aids to assist patients and professionals in choosing the right treatment for kidney failure
Bekker, H., Winterbottom, A., Gavaruzzi, T., Finderup, J., & Mooney, A. F. (2023) · Clinical Kidney Journal · doi:10.1093/ckj/sfad172 · Cited by 38
“I was considering surgery because I believed that was how it was treated”: a qualitative study on willingness for joint surgery after completion of a digital management program for osteoarthritis
Cronström, A., Dahlberg, L., Nero, H., & Hammarlund, C. S. (2019) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2019.04.004 · Cited by 36
Factors Affecting Patient Adherence to Multivitamin Intake After Bariatric Surgery: a Multicentre Survey Study from the Patient’s Perspective
Smelt, H. J. M., Heusschen, L., Theel, W. B., van Rutte, P. W. J., Nijboer, T., Pouwels, S., Smulders, J. F., & Hazebroek, E. J. (2021) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11695-021-05571-y · Cited by 36
Digital health interventions for osteoporosis and post-fragility fracture care
Gupta, A., Maslen, C., Vindlacheruvu, M., Abel, R. L., Bhattacharya, P., Bromiley, P. A., Clark, E., Compston, J. E., Crabtree, N. J., Gregory, J. S., et al. (2022) · Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease · doi:10.1177/1759720x221083523 · Cited by 41
“What Is the Right Decision for Me?” Integrating Patient Perspectives Through Shared Decision-Making for Valvular Heart Disease Therapy
Lauck, S., Lewis, K. B., Borregaard, B., & Sousa, I. D. (2021) · Canadian Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2021.02.022 · Cited by 35
Ready for SDM: evaluating a train-the-trainer program to facilitate implementation of SDM training in Norway
Kienlin, S. M., Poitras, M.-È., Stacey, D., Nytrøen, K., & Kasper, J. (2021) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-021-01494-x · Cited by 36
Self-citation
What does shared decision making ask from doctors? Uncovering suppressed qualities that could improve person-centered care
Pieterse, A. H., Gulbrandsen, P., Ofstad, E. H., & Menichetti, J. (2023) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2023.107801 · Cited by 35
Evaluation of a shared decision-making communication skills training for physicians treating patients with asthma: a mixed methods study using simulated patients
Müller, E., Diesing, A., Rosahl, A., Scholl, I., Härter, M. C., & Buchholz, A. (2019) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4445-y · Cited by 34
New galaxies in the universe of shared decision-making and rheumatoid arthritis
Barton, J. L., & Décary, S. (2020) · Current Opinion in Rheumatology · doi:10.1097/bor.0000000000000699 · Cited by 34
Enhancing patient-centred care in dentistry: a narrative review
Kristensen, C. B., Asimakopoulou, K. G., & Scambler, S. (2023) · British Medical Bulletin · doi:10.1093/bmb/ldad026 · Cited by 40
Large language models as decision aids in neuro-oncology: a review of shared decision-making applications
McLean, A. L., Wu, Y., McLean, A. C. L., & Hristidis, V. (2024) · Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s00432-024-05673-x · Cited by 34
Identifying Entrustable Professional Activities for Shared Decision Making in Postgraduate Medical Education: A National Delphi Study
Baghus, A., Giroldi, E., Muris, J. W. M., Stiggelbout, A. M., van de Pol, M. H. J., Timmerman, A. A., & van der Weijden, T. (2020) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000003618 · Cited by 37
Sex and gender considerations in implementation interventions to promote shared decision making: A secondary analysis of a Cochrane systematic review
Adisso, É. L., Zomahoun, H. T. V., Gogovor, A., & Légaré, F. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240371 · Cited by 35
Self-citation
Availability and effectiveness of decision aids for supporting shared decision making in patients with advanced colorectal and lung cancer: Results from a systematic review
Spronk, I., Meijers, M. C., Heins, M. J., Francke, A. L., Elwyn, G. J., van Lindert, A. S. R., van Dulmen, S., & van Vliet, L. M. (2019) · European Journal of Cancer Care · doi:10.1111/ecc.13079 · Cited by 32
Self-citation
Making shared decisions in relation to planned caesarean sections: What are we up to?
Coates, D., Thirukumar, P., & Henry, A. (2019) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2019.12.001 · Cited by 34
Shared decision-making in healthcare in mainland China: a scoping review
Li, X., Yang, D., Meng, M., Zhao, J., Yin, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, X., Liu, Q., Li, M., Liu, J., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1162993 · Cited by 37
Shared decision‐making across the specialties: Much potential but many challenges
Kalsi, D., Ward, J., Lee, R., Fulford, K. W. M., & Handa, A. I. (2019) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.13276 · Cited by 32
Decisional needs assessment of patients with complex care needs in primary care
Poitras, M.-È., Hudon, C., Godbout, I., Bujold, M., Pluye, P., Vaillancourt, V. T., Débarges, B., Poirier, A., Prévost, K., Spence, C., et al. (2019) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.13325 · Cited by 32
Self-citation
Perspectives about dignity during acute care for older people and their relatives: A qualitative study
Kerr, D. C., Crone, R., & Dunning, T. L. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.15438 · Cited by 31
Interventions for involving older patients with multi-morbidity in decision-making during primary care consultations
Butterworth, J. E., Goulding, R., McDonagh, S. T. J., Richards, S. H., Bower, P., & Campbell, J. (2019) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd013124.pub2 · Cited by 31
Engaging Caregivers in Health-Related Housing Decisions for Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: A Cluster Randomized Trial
Adekpedjou, R., Stacey, D., Brière, N., Freitas, A., Garvelink, M. M., Dogba, M. J., Durand, P. J., Desroches, S., Croteau, J., Rivest, L., et al. (2019) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnz045 · Cited by 32
Self-citation
Informed shared decision-making programme for patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial
Buhse, S., Kuniß, N., Liethmann, K., Müller, U., Lehmann, T., & Mühlhauser, I. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024004 · Cited by 31
Shared decision making between older people with multimorbidity and GPs: a qualitative study
Brown, E., Poltawski, L., Pitchforth, E., Richards, S., Campbell, J., & Butterworth, J. (2022) · The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · doi:10.3399/bjgp.2021.0529 · Cited by 25
Preferences Across Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Modalities Among Young Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States: A Latent Class Analysis Study
Valente, P. K., Bauermeister, J. A., Lin, W., da Silva, D. T., Hightow‐Weidman, L., Drab, R., Mayer, K. H., Operario, D., Rusley, J. C., & Biello, K. B. (2022) · AIDS Patient Care and STDs · doi:10.1089/apc.2022.0111 · Cited by 30
The Six Steps of SDM: linking theory to practice, measurement and implementation
Clayman, M. L., Scheibler, F., Rüffer, J. U., Wehkamp, K., & Geiger, F. (2023) · BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112289 · Cited by 29
Interventions for Indigenous Peoples making health decisions: a systematic review
Jull, J., Fairman, K., Oliver, S. R., Hesmer, B., Pullattayil, A. K., & Not Deciding Alone Team (2023) · Archives of Public Health · doi:10.1186/s13690-023-01177-1 · Cited by 34
Sliding-Scale Shared Decision Making for Patients With Reduced Capacity
Lahey, T., & Elwyn, G. J. (2020) · The AMA Journal of Ethic · doi:10.1001/amajethics.2020.358 · Cited by 31
Self-citation
Envisioning Shared Decision Making: A Reflection for the Next Decade
Barton, J. L., Kunneman, M., Hargraves, I. G., LeBlanc, A., Brito, J. P., Scholl, I., & Montori, V. M. (2020) · MDM Policy & Practice · doi:10.1177/2381468320963781 · Cited by 30
Care Models for Long COVID : A Rapid Systematic ReviewPreprint
Décary, S., Dugas, M., Stefan, T., Langlois, L., Skidmore, B., Bhéreur, A., LeBlanc, A., Services, A. H., Hastings, S. E., Manns, B., et al. (2021) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.11.17.21266404 · Cited by 28
Is There a Relationship between Shared Decision Making and Breast Cancer Patients’ Trust in Their Medical Oncologists?
Engelhardt, E. G., Smets, E. M. A., Sorial, I., Stiggelbout, A. M., Pieterse, A. H., & Hillen, M. A. (2019) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x19889905 · Cited by 27
Improvement of shared decision making in integrated stroke care: a before and after evaluation using a questionnaire survey
Voogdt-Pruis, H. R., Ras, T., van der Dussen, L., Benjaminsen, S., Goossens, P. H., Raats, I., Boss, G. R., van Hoef, E. F. M., Lindhout, M. I. C., Tjon-A-Tsien, M. R. S., et al. (2019) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4761-2 · Cited by 27
Low value care is a health hazard that calls for patient empowerment
Scott, I. A., Elshaug, A. G., & Fox, M. A. (2021) · The Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/mja2.51168 · Cited by 26

Authors: Légaré, F., Adekpedjou, R., Stacey, D., Turcotte, S., Kryworuchko, J., Graham, I. D., Lyddiatt, A., Politi, M. C., Thomson, R., Elwyn, G., & Donner-Banzhoff, N.
Affiliations: Université Laval (CA)
University of Ottawa (CA)
Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise (CA)
University of British Columbia (CA)
No affiliation; 28 Greenwood Road Ingersoll ON Canada N5C 3N1
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Newcastle University (GB)
Cochrane (GB)
University of Marburg; Department of Family Medicine / General Practice; Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 4 Marburg Germany D-35039
ORCID: Légaré, France
Adekpedjou, Rhéda
Stacey, Dawn
Turcotte, Stéphane
Kryworuchko, Jennifer
Graham, Ian D
Lyddiatt, Anne
Politi, Mary C
Elwyn, Glyn
Venue: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 2018-07-19
Volume: 2018
Issue: 7
Pages: CD006732-CD006732
ISSN: 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
1465-1858
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006732.pub4
PMC: PMC6513543
OpenAlex: W2884603128
Cited by: 698
References: 205
Citations by year: 2026: 34 · 2025: 120 · 2024: 124 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 8
FWCI: 10.20
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Locations: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics: Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords: shared decision-making, healthcare workers, intervention, decision aids, patient activation, patient education, patient-provider communication, decision regret, patient satisfaction, patient-reported outcomes, patient-centered care, implementation of shared decision making, multicomponent intervention, contamination risk, risk of bias, quality of evidence, patient engagement, patient participation
MeSH terms: Decision Making, Decision Support Techniques, Health Personnel, Humans, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Participation, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks