Cited by 730Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPhysical Activity and HealthPain Mechanisms and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 136 of the 136 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 52 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Physical activity and exercise for chronic pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews

Open access
Geneen, Louise J, Moore, R Andrew, Clarke, Clare, Martin, Denis, Colvin, Lesley A, Smith, Blair H·2017·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is defined as pain lasting beyond normal tissue healing time, generally taken to be 12 weeks. It contributes to disability, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbances, poor quality of life, and healthcare costs. Chronic pain has a weighted mean prevalence in adults of 20%.For many years, the treatment choice for chronic pain included recommendations for rest and inactivity. However, exercise may have specific benefits in reducing the severity of chronic pain, as well as more general benefits associated with improved overall physical and mental health, and physical functioning.Physical activity and exercise programmes are increasingly being promoted and offered in various healthcare systems, and for a variety of chronic pain conditions. It is therefore important at this stage to establish the efficacy and safety of these programmes, and furthermore to address the critical factors that determine their success or failure. OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of Cochrane Reviews of adults with chronic pain to determine (1) the effectiveness of different physical activity and exercise interventions in reducing pain severity and its impact on function, quality of life, and healthcare use; and (2) the evidence for any adverse effects or harm associated with physical activity and exercise interventions. METHODS: We searched theCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) on the Cochrane Library (CDSR 2016, Issue 1) for systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), after which we tracked any included reviews for updates, and tracked protocols in case of full review publication until an arbitrary cut-off date of 21 March 2016 (CDSR 2016, Issue 3). We assessed the methodological quality of the reviews using the AMSTAR tool, and also planned to analyse data for each painful condition based on quality of the evidence.We extracted data for (1) self-reported pain severity, (2) physical function (objectively or subjectively measured), (3) psychological function, (4) quality of life, (5) adherence to the prescribed intervention, (6) healthcare use/attendance, (7) adverse events, and (8) death.Due to the limited data available, we were unable to directly compare and analyse interventions, and have instead reported the evidence qualitatively. MAIN RESULTS: We included 21 reviews with 381 included studies and 37,143 participants. Of these, 264 studies (19,642 participants) examined exercise versus no exercise/minimal intervention in adults with chronic pain and were used in the qualitative analysis.Pain conditions included rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, low back pain, intermittent claudication, dysmenorrhoea, mechanical neck disorder, spinal cord injury, postpolio syndrome, and patellofemoral pain. None of the reviews assessed 'chronic pain' or 'chronic widespread pain' as a general term or specific condition. Interventions included aerobic, strength, flexibility, range of motion, and core or balance training programmes, as well as yoga, Pilates, and tai chi.Reviews were well performed and reported (based on AMSTAR), and included studies had acceptable risk of bias (with inadequate reporting of attrition and reporting biases). However the quality of evidence was low due to participant numbers (most included studies had fewer than 50 participants in total), length of intervention and follow-up (rarely assessed beyond three to six months). We pooled the results from relevant reviews where appropriate, though results should be interpreted with caution due to the low quality evidence. Pain severity: several reviews noted favourable results from exercise: only three reviews that reported pain severity found no statistically significant changes in usual or mean pain from any intervention. However, results were inconsistent across interventions and follow-up, as exercise did not consistently bring about a change (positive or negative) in self-reported pain scores at any single point. Physical function: was the most commonly reported outcome measure. Physical function was significantly improved as a result of the intervention in 14 reviews, though even these statistically significant results had only small-to-moderate effect sizes (only one review reported large effect sizes). Psychological function and quality of life: had variable results: results were either favourable to exercise (generally small and moderate effect size, with two reviews reporting significant, large effect sizes for quality of life), or showed no difference between groups. There were no negative effects. Adherence to the prescribed intervention: could not be assessed in any review. However, risk of withdrawal/dropout was slightly higher in the exercising group (82.8/1000 participants versus 81/1000 participants), though the group difference was non-significant. Healthcare use/attendance: was not reported in any review. Adverse events, potential harm, and death: only 25% of included studies (across 18 reviews

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd011279.pub2

Cites

136 of 136 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 52 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 73 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 53
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 100
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 6
128 of 128
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Exercise is likely to have minimal adverse effects compared with pharmaceutical and surgical interventions in adults with chronic pain.

    “It is likely to be associated with minimal adverse effects, such as interactions with medication and potential for abuse in adults with chronic pain, when compared to pharmaceutical and surgical interventions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Cochrane reviews are properly conducted.

    “Additional quantitative analyses were not required, since we only considered results from properly conducted (Cochrane) reviews.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Physical activity and exercise can be adapted for an individual and can be self-directed.

    “Physical activity and exercise can be adapted for an individual, and is something people can do to help themselves.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Blinding participants and personnel to exercise or physical activity allocation is very difficult.

    “With any exercise or physical activity intervention it is very difficult to blind both participants and personnel to the allocation, though some studies included in reviews attempted to by offering sham exercise.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Control group baseline and earliest control group scores can serve as approximate baseline measures for intervention groups.

    “but we were able to use control group baseline and earliest control group scores as assumed or approximate baseline measures for the intervention groups in nine reviews”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Regardless of aetiology, the impact of chronic pain is broadly similar across many conditions.

    “Regardless of aetiology, the impact of chronic pain is broadly similar across many conditions.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The majority of the included population had mild-to-moderate pain severity, assumed because of the lack of exact baseline group data.

    “The majority of the included population had an assumed mild-to-moderate pain severity score (assumed only due to lack of exact group data at baseline).”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • The review-group count does not match the list

    Minor

    The text says the 21 reviews came from five Cochrane Review groups, but the ensuing list names seven distinct groups.

  • The attrition-bias summary conflicts with its reported percentage

    Minor

    The quality discussion says fewer than half of studies were at low risk for attrition and reporting biases. The results instead put low risk of attrition bias at about 55%, although the reporting-bias figure is below half.

  • One AMSTAR row exceeds the eleven-item total

    Minor

    The Hayden 2005 row reports 10 yes and 2 no answers. Those counts sum to 12, although the tool has only 11 criteria.

    Reported 11 · recomputed 12

  • A psychological-function estimate lies outside its confidence interval

    Minor

    The reported SMD of 0.16 is above the reported 95% confidence interval's upper bound of 0.032. The midpoint of the printed bounds is 0.021, not 0.16.

    Reported 0.16 · recomputed 0.021

  • Withdrawal-group denominators exceed the stated sample

    Minor

    The Bidonde 2014 withdrawal row gives group denominators of 252 and 232, totalling 484, while stating that the eight studies had 472 participants.

    Reported 472 · recomputed 484

5 of 5

Citations

Cites

9 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 136 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Gross, 2012, Patient education for neck pain, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 10.1002/14651858.cd005106.pub4 · DOI
  2. Merskey H Bogduk N Part III: Pain terms: a current list with definitions and notes on usage Classification of Chronic Pain 2nd Edition Seattle IASP Task Force on Taxonomy, IASP Press
  3. Mooney, 2006, Clinical management of chronic, disabling low back syndromes
  4. Moore, 2008, Managing potential publication bias, 15
  5. Moore RA Derry S Taylor RS Straube S Phillips CJ The costs and consequences of adequately managed chronic non-cancer pain and chronic neuropathic pain Pain Practice 2014 79 94 · DOI
  6. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Cochrane Review Manager (RevMan) 2014
  7. 2013, Management of chronic pain. SIGN publication no. 136
  8. Timmon, 2014, Do we have a valid public health strategy for exercise prescription?, Sport and Exercise Scientist, 39, 26

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 730

Metadata

Authors
Geneen, L. J., Moore, R. A., Clarke, C., Martin, D., Colvin, L. A., & Smith, B. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • Teesside University (GB)
  • Western General Hospital (GB)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Published
2017-01-14
Volume
1
Pages
CD011279-CD011279
ISSN
1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2962729479
Cited by
719
References
136
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 117 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 7
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Teesside University Research Portal (Teesside University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • McMaster University
  • National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • National Institute for Academic Anaesthesia
  • Royal College of Anaesthetists
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
physical activity, exercise intervention, pain intensity, physical function, quality of life, health care utilization, adverse effects, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, low back pain, neck pain, whiplash injury, sciatica, post-stroke pain, cancer pain, spinal cord injury, stroke rehabilitation, exercise adherence, exercise safety
MeSH terms
Adult, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Pain Measurement, Patient Compliance, Quality of Life, Review Literature as Topic, Exercise, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Exercise Movement Techniques, Chronic Pain, Myalgia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review