Cited by 873Osteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

Effects of Intensive Diet and Exercise on Knee Joint Loads, Inflammation, and Clinical Outcomes Among Overweight and Obese Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis: The IDEA Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Messier, Stephen P., Mihalko, Shannon L., Legault, Claudine, Miller, Gary D., Nicklas, Barbara J., DeVita, Paul, Beavers, Daniel P., Hunter, David J. +6 more·2013·JAMA

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Knee osteoarthritis (OA), a common cause of chronic pain and disability, has biomechanical and inflammatory origins and is exacerbated by obesity. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a ≥10% reduction in body weight induced by diet, with or without exercise, would improve mechanistic and clinical outcomes more than exercise alone. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Single-blind, 18-month, randomized clinical trial at Wake Forest University between July 2006 and April 2011. The diet and exercise interventions were center-based with options for the exercise groups to transition to a home-based program. Participants were 454 overweight and obese older community-dwelling adults (age ≥55 years with body mass index of 27-41) with pain and radiographic knee OA. INTERVENTIONS: Intensive diet-induced weight loss plus exercise, intensive diet-induced weight loss, or exercise. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Mechanistic primary outcomes: knee joint compressive force and plasma IL-6 levels; secondary clinical outcomes: self-reported pain (range, 0-20), function (range, 0-68), mobility, and health-related quality of life (range, 0-100). RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-nine participants (88%) completed the study. Mean weight loss for diet + exercise participants was 10.6 kg (11.4%); for the diet group, 8.9 kg (9.5%); and for the exercise group, 1.8 kg (2.0%). After 18 months, knee compressive forces were lower in diet participants (mean, 2487 N; 95% CI, 2393 to 2581) compared with exercise participants (2687 N; 95% CI, 2590 to 2784, pairwise difference [Δ](exercise vs diet )= 200 N; 95% CI, 55 to 345; P = .007). Concentrations of IL-6 were lower in diet + exercise (2.7 pg/mL; 95% CI, 2.5 to 3.0) and diet participants (2.7 pg/mL; 95% CI, 2.4 to 3.0) compared with exercise participants (3.1 pg/mL; 95% CI, 2.9 to 3.4; Δ(exercise vs diet + exercise) = 0.39 pg/mL; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.81; P = .007; Δ(exercise vs diet )= 0.43 pg/mL; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.85, P = .006). The diet + exercise group had less pain (3.6; 95% CI, 3.2 to 4.1) and better function (14.1; 95% CI, 12.6 to 15.6) than both the diet group (4.8; 95% CI, 4.3 to 5.2) and exercise group (4.7; 95% CI, 4.2 to 5.1, Δ(exercise vs diet + exercise) = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.33 to 1.71; P(pain) = .004; 18.4; 95% CI, 16.9 to 19.9; Δ(exercise vs diet + exercise), 4.29; 95% CI, 2.07 to 6.50; P(function )< .001). The diet + exercise group (44.7; 95% CI, 43.4 to 46.0) also had better physical health-related quality of life scores than the exercise group (41.9; 95% CI, 40.5 to 43.2; Δ(exercise vs diet + exercise) = -2.81; 95% CI, -4.76 to -0.86; P = .005). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among overweight and obese adults with knee OA, after 18 months, participants in the diet + exercise and diet groups had more weight loss and greater reductions in IL-6 levels than those in the exercise group; those in the diet group had greater reductions in knee compressive force than those in the exercise group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00381290.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2013.277669

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In ten trials, a weight-reducing diet alone resulted in the desired weight loss, which consisted of fat mass as well as lean mass.

    “In ten trials, a weight-reducing diet alone resulted in the desired weight loss, which consisted of fat mass as well as lean mass (290)(291)(292)(294)(295)(296)(297)(298)(299).”

    From ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics (2022) · cites this paper as [294]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For several physical and strength-performance measures, greater improvements were observed in the combined groups than in the diet-only groups.

    “Moreover, for several physical and strengthperformance measures, greater improvements were observed in the combined groups than in the diet-only groups (288-291, 293-297, 299).”

    From ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics (2022) · cites this paper as [294]

    The Results (Pain and Function; Mobility and HRQL, page not provided) show better function and a longer 6-minute walk distance in the diet-plus-exercise group than in the diet-only group. The paper describes strength training as part of the intervention but does not report a strength-performance improvement; its walk-speed comparison between those groups was not significant. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Many studies from the authors' group and others show improvements in muscle strength and function in older adults participating in lifestyle-based weight loss interventions, despite significant weight and lean mass loss.

    “Likewise, many studies from our group (31, 32, 33), and others (34, 35), show improvements in muscle strength and function in older adults participating in lifestyle-based weight loss interventions, despite experiencing significant weight and LM loss (36, 37).”
  • Twelve RCTs compared the effects of a dietary weight loss intervention alone to a combination of the same dietary intervention with an exercise intervention in older persons.

    “Twelve RCTs were identified that compared the effects of a dietary weight loss intervention alone to a combination of the same dietary intervention with an exercise intervention in older persons (288)(289)(290)(291)(292)(293)(294)(295)(296)(297)(298)(299).”
  • Aerobic training has a strong association with weight loss.

    “Aerobic exercise is also strongly linked to weight loss (Messier 2013)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults [report No. 98-4083] Accessed August 28, 2013 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2003/.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Messier, S. P., Mihalko, S. L., Legault, C., Miller, G. D., Nicklas, B. J., DeVita, P., Beavers, D. P., Hunter, D. J., Lyles, M. F., Eckstein, F., Williamson, J. D., Carr, J. J., Guermazi, A., & Loeser, R. F.
Affiliations
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Wake Forest University (US)
  • East Carolina University (US)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Paracelsus Medical University (AT)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Messier, Stephen P.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2013-09-25
Volume
310
Issue
12
Pages
1263
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2103179033
Cited by
873
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 83 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 5
FWCI
42.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG021332)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR052528)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000211)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Keywords
knee osteoarthritis, obesity, overweight, weight loss, diet-induced weight loss, physical activity, knee joint loading, interleukin-6, inflammation, knee pain, knee function, health-related quality of life, older adults, home-based exercise, radiographic osteoarthritis
MeSH terms
Aged, Biomechanical Phenomena, Diet, Reducing, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Pain Measurement, Quality of Life, Biomarkers, Weight Loss, Interleukin-6, Body Mass Index, Single-Blind Method, Weight-Bearing, Treatment Outcome, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Overweight, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review