Cited by 66Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and research

Mindfulness-based stress reduction for family carers of people with dementia

Open access
Liu, Zheng, Sun, Yu-Ying, Zhong, Bao-liang·2018·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Caring for people with dementia is highly challenging, and family carers are recognised as being at increased risk of physical and mental ill-health. Most current interventions have limited success in reducing stress among carers of people with dementia. Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) draws on a range of practices and may be a promising approach to helping carers of people with dementia. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of MBSR in reducing the stress of family carers of people with dementia. SEARCH METHODS: We searched ALOIS - the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group's Specialized Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (all years to Issue 9 of 12, 2017), MEDLINE (Ovid SP 1950 to September 2017), Embase (Ovid SP 1974 to Sepetmber 2017), Web of Science (ISI Web of Science 1945 to September 2017), PsycINFO (Ovid SP 1806 to September 2017), CINAHL (all dates to September 2017), LILACS (all dates to September 2017), World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), ClinicalTrials.gov, and Dissertation Abstracts International (DAI) up to 6 September 2017, with no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of MBSR for family carers of people with dementia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened references for inclusion criteria, extracted data, assessed the risk of bias of trials with the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool, and evaluated the quality of the evidence using the GRADE instrument. We contacted study authors for additional information, then conducted meta-analyses, or reported results narratively in the case of insufficient data. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS: We included five RCTs involving 201 carers assessing the effectiveness of MBSR. Controls used in included studies varied in structure and content. Mindfulness-based stress reduction programmes were compared with either active controls (those matched for time and attention with MBSR, i.e. education, social support, or progressive muscle relaxation), or inactive controls (those not matched for time and attention with MBSR, i.e. self help education or respite care). One trial used both active and inactive comparisons with MBSR. All studies were at high risk of bias in terms of blinding of outcome assessment. Most studies provided no information about selective reporting, incomplete outcome data, or allocation concealment.1. Compared with active controls, MBSR may reduce depressive symptoms of carers at the end of the intervention (3 trials, 135 participants; standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.98 to -0.28; P<0.001; low-quality evidence). We could not be certain of any effect on clinically significant depressive symptoms (very low-quality evidence).Mindfulness-based stress reduction compared with active control may decrease carer anxiety at the end of the intervention (1 trial, 78 participants; mean difference (MD) -7.50, 95% CI -13.11 to -1.89; P<0.001; low-quality evidence) and may slightly increase carer burden (3 trials, 135 participants; SMD 0.24, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.58; P=0.18; low-quality evidence), although both results were imprecise, and we could not exclude little or no effect. Due to the very low quality of the evidence, we could not be sure of any effect on carers' coping style, nor could we determine whether carers were more or less likely to drop out of treatment.2. Compared with inactive controls, MBSR showed no clear evidence of any effect on depressive symptoms (2 trials, 50 participants; MD -1.97, 95% CI -6.89 to 2.95; P=0.43; low-quality evidence). We could not be certain of any effect on clinically significant depressive symptoms (very low-quality evidence).In this comparison, MBSR may also reduce carer anxiety at the end of the intervention (1 trial, 33 participants; MD -7.27, 95% CI -14.92 to 0.38; P=0.06; low-quality evidence), although we were unable to exclude little or no effect. Due to the very low quality of the evidence, we could not be certain of any effects of MBSR on carer burden, the use of positive coping strategies, or dropout rates.We found no studies that looked at quality of life of carers or care-recipients, or institutionalisation.Only one included study reported on adverse events, noting a single adverse event related to yoga practices at home AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: After accounting for non-specific effects of the intervention (i.e. comparing it with an active control), low-quality evidence suggests that MBSR may reduce carers' depressive symptoms and anxiety, at least in the short term.There are significant limitations to the evidence base on MBSR in this population. Our GRADE assessment of the evidence was low to very low quality. We downgraded the quality of the evidence primarily because of high risk of detection or performance bias, and imprecision.I

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd012791.pub2

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A Cochrane Review found only minimal, low-quality evidence that mindfulness alone reduces short-term anxiety and depressive symptoms in ADRD family caregivers.

    “A Cochrane Review regarding efficacy of mindfulness-based stress reduction for ADRD family caregivers found minimal and low quality evidence that mindfulness alone reduces short-term anxiety and depressive symptoms in this population (Liu et al., 2018).”

    From Feasibility and acceptability of a telephone-based ACT intervention for caregivers (TACTICs) of adults with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD): a randomized pilot during the COVID-19 pandemic. (2025) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2018

    The Authors’ conclusions (page not available) say that low-quality evidence suggests MBSR may reduce carers’ depressive symptoms and anxiety in the short term. The Main results find no clear effect on depressive symptoms versus inactive controls, and the Interventions section describes MBSR as a programme of several practices, not mindfulness alone. The claim overstates both the certainty of the reductions and what was tested. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Danucalov 2017 {published data only} Danucalov MA, Kozasa EH, Afonso RF, Galduroz JC, Leite JR. Yoga and compassion meditation program improve quality of life and self-compassion in family caregivers of Alzheimer's disease patients: a randomized controlled trial. Geriatrics & Gerontology International 2017;17(1):85-91.
  2. Dharmawardene 2016 {published data only} Dharmawardene M, Givens J, Wachholtz A, Makowski S, Tjia J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of meditative interventions for informal caregivers and health professionals. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care 2016;6(2):160-9.
  3. Hurley 2014 {published data only} Hurley RVC, Patterson TG, Cooley SJ. Meditation-based interventions for family caregivers of people with dementia: a review of the empirical literature. Aging & Mental Health 2014;18(3):281-8.
  4. Kor 2017 {published data only} Kor PP, Chien WT, Liu JY, Lai CK. Mindfulness-based intervention for stress reduction of family caregivers of people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mindfulness 2017;9(1):7-22.
  5. Leach 2014 {published data only} Leach MJ, Francis A, Ziaian T. Improving the health and well- being of community-dwelling caregivers of dementia sufferers: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial of structured meditation training. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 2014;20(2):136-41.
  6. Leach 2015 {published data only} Leach MJ, Francis A, Ziaian T. Transcendental meditation for the improvement of health and wellbeing in community-dwelling dementia caregivers [TRANSCENDENT]: a randomised wait-list controlled trial. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2015;15(1):145.
  7. Li 2016 {published data only} Li G, Yuan H, Zhang W. The effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction for family caregivers: systematic review. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing 2016;30(2):292-9.
  8. Borders A, Earleywine M, Jajodia A. Could mindfulness decrease anger, hostility, and aggression by decreasing rumination?. Aggressive Behavior 2010;36(1):28-44.
  9. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd Edition. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., 1988.
  10. Cooper C, Balamurali TBS, Livingston G. A systematic review of the prevalence and covariates of anxiety in caregivers of people with dementia. International Psychogeriatrics/IPA 2007;19(2):175-95.
  11. Cuijpers P. Depressive disorders in caregivers of dementia patients: a systematic review. Aging & Mental Health 2005;9(4):325-30.
  12. Egger M, Davey-Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315(7109):629-34.
  13. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction -GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011;64(4):383-94.
  14. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327(7414):557-60.
  15. Higgins 2011a Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ. Chapter 7: Selecting studies and collecting data. In Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
  16. Higgins 2011b Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011;343:d5928.
  17. Jaffray L, Bridgman H, Stephens M, Skinner T. Evaluating the effects of mindfulness-based interventions for informal palliative caregivers: a systematic literature review. Palliative Medicine 2015;30:117-31.
  18. Lawton MP, Kleban MH, Moss M, Rovine M, Glicksman A. Measuring care-giving appraisal. Journal of Gerontology 1989;44(3):61-71.
  19. Mausbach BT, Patterson TL, Rabinowitz YG, Grant I, Schulz R. Depression and distress predict time to cardiovascular disease in dementia caregivers. Health Psychology 2007;26:539.
  20. Peacock S, Forbes DA. Interventions for caregivers of persons with dementia: a systematic review. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 2003; Vol. 35, issue 4:88-107.
  21. Pearlin LI, Mullan JT, Semple SJ, Skaff MM. Caregiving and the stress process: an overview of concepts and their measures. Gerontologist 1990;30:583-94.
  22. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement 1977;1(3):385-401. RevMan 2014 [Computer program] Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
  23. Spielberger CD, Gorusch RL, Lushehe R, Vagg PR, Jacobs GA. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Mountain View (CA): Consulting Psychologist Press, 1983.
  24. Sterne JAC, Egger M, Moher D. Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons.
  25. Sörensen S, Pinquart M, Duberstein P. How effective are interventions with caregivers? An updated meta-analysis. Gerontologist 2002;42(3):356-72.
  26. Teri L, Truax P, Logsdon R, Uomoto J, Zarit S, Vitaliano PP. Assessment of behavioral problems in dementia: The Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist. Psychology and Aging 1992;7(4):622-31.
  27. Thomas P, Lalloué F, Preux PM, Hazif-Thomas C, Pariel S, Inscale R, et al. Dementia patients caregivers quality of life: the PIXEL study. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2006;21(1):50-6.
  28. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1983;17(1):37-49.
  29. Zarit SH, Reever KE, Bach-Peterson J. Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden. Gerontologist 1980;20(6):649-55.
  30. Zarit SH. Past is prologue: how to advance caregiver interventions. Aging & Mental Health 2017;21:1-6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Z., Sun, Y.-Y., & Zhong, B.-L.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • The Chinese University of Hong Kong; Public Health; Prince of Wales Hospital Hong Kong China
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-08-14
Volume
2018
Issue
8
Pages
CD012791-CD012791
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W2750601897
Cited by
66
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Evidence Synthesis Programme
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
mindfulness-based stress reduction, family caregivers, dementia, caregiver stress, caregiver burden, depression, anxiety, quality of life, mindfulness-based interventions, caregiver well-being, respite care, social support, progressive muscle relaxation, intervention comparison, risk of bias assessment, GRADE quality of evidence, meta-analysis of RCTs
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Dementia, Depression, Family, Humans, Patient Dropouts, Stress, Psychological, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Caregivers, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review