Cited by 367Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyIndian and Buddhist Studies

Mindfulness-Based Interventions: An Emerging Phenomenon

Cullen, Margaret·2011·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-011-0058-1

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cullen, M.
Corresponding author
Cullen, Margaret
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2011-05-17
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
186-193
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W1973538803
Cited by
366
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
FWCI
18.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fetzer Institute
  • University of Oxford
  • Bangor University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, mindfulness-based stress reduction, Jon Kabat-Zinn, four foundations of mindfulness, secular mindfulness, teacher qualifications, healthcare transformation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review