Cited by 20Climate Change and GeoengineeringClimate variability and modelsAtmospheric aerosols and clouds

On solar geoengineering and climate uncertainty

Open access
MacMartin, Douglas G., Kravitz, Ben, Rasch, Philip J.·2015·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

Uncertain climate system response has been raised as a concern regarding solar geoengineering. We explore the effects of geoengineering on one source of climate system uncertainty by evaluating the intermodel spread across 12 climate models participating in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison project. The model spread in simulations of climate change and the model spread in the response to solar geoengineering are not additive but rather partially cancel. That is, the model spread in regional temperature and precipitation changes is reduced with CO 2 and a solar reduction, in comparison to the case with increased CO 2 alone. Furthermore, differences between models in their efficacy (the relative global mean temperature effect of solar versus CO 2 radiative forcing) explain most of the regional differences between models in their response to an increased CO 2 concentration that is offset by a solar reduction. These conclusions are important for clarifying geoengineering risks regarding uncertainty.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2015gl065391

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Solar geoengineering could be a moderating force against the uncertainties climate change already introduces.

    “However, although it creates new risks, solar geoengineering could actually be a moderating force against the terrifying uncertainties climate change already introduces [374,509]”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [509]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Collins, M., et al. (2013), Long-term climate change: Projections, commitments and irreversibility, in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by T. F. Stocker et al., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U. K., and New York.
  2. Flato, G., et al. (2013), Evaluation of climate models, in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, pp. 741-882, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U. K., and New York.
  3. National Academy of Sciences (2015), Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth, Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, D. C.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacMartin, D. G., Kravitz, B., & Rasch, P. J.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
MacMartin, Douglas G.
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2015-09-03
Volume
42
Issue
17
Pages
7156-7161
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W1929832008
Cited by
20
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Battelle Memorial Institute (DE-AC05-76RL01830)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Keywords
solar geoengineering, climate uncertainty, inter-model spread, GeoMIP, regional temperature change, regional precipitation change, CO2 radiative forcing, solar forcing, climate change projections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review