Cited by 28Climate Change and GeoengineeringAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsSustainability and Climate Change Governance

Technical characteristics of a solar geoengineering deployment and implications for governance

Open access
MacMartin, Douglas G., Irvine, Peter J., Kravitz, Ben, Horton, Joshua B.·2019·Climate Policy

Abstract

Consideration of solar geoengineering as a potential response to climate change will demand complex decisions. These include not only the choice of whether to deploy solar engineering, but decisions regarding how to deploy, and ongoing decision-making throughout deployment. Research on the governance of solar geoengineering to date has primarily engaged only with the question of whether to deploy. We examine the science of solar geoengineering in order to clarify the technical dimensions of decisions about deployment – both strategic and operational – and how these might influence governance considerations, while consciously refraining from making specific recommendations. The focus here is on a hypothetical deployment rather than governance of the research itself. We first consider the complexity surrounding the design of a deployment scheme, in particular the complicated and difficult decision of what its objective(s) would be, given that different choices for how to deploy will lead to different climate outcomes. Next, we discuss the on-going decisions across multiple timescales, from the sub-annual to the multi-decadal. For example, feedback approaches might effectively manage some uncertainties, but would require frequent adjustments to the solar geoengineering deployment in response to observations. Other decisions would be tied to the inherently slow process of detection and attribution of climate effects in the presence of natural variability. Both of these present challenges to decision-making. These considerations point toward particular governance requirements, including an important role for technical experts – with all the challenges that entails.Key policy insights Decisions about solar geoengineering deployment will be informed not only by political choices, but also by climate science and engineering.Design decisions will pertain to the spatial and temporal goals of a climate intervention and strategies for achieving those goals.Some uncertainty can be managed through feedback, but this would require frequent operational decisions.Some strategic decisions will depend on the detection and attribution of climatic effects from solar geoengineering, which may take decades.Governance for solar geoengineering deployment will likely need to incorporate technical expertise for making short-term adjustments to the deployment and conducting attribution analysis, while also slowing down decisions made in response to attribution analysis to avoid hasty choices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14693062.2019.1668347

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The SAI adjustment in a volcanic future is not simply one of scale down; SAI injection may need to increase in the opposite hemisphere to the volcanic eruption to ensure a more uniform global temperature.

    “However, the SAI adjustment in a volcanic future is not simply one of scale down. SAI injection may need to increase in the opposite hemisphere to the volcanic eruption to ensure a more uniform global temperature (MacMartin et al., 2019)”

    From A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk (2021) · cites this paper as MacMartin et al., 2019

    Section 4.1 says that after a volcanic eruption it may be wise to decrease SAI injection overall while increasing injection in the opposite hemisphere. It gives the purpose of that opposite-hemisphere increase as counterbalancing effects on tropical precipitation, not ensuring a more uniform global temperature. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • SAI should be rapidly scaled down in a matter of weeks in response to a large volcanic eruption.

    “SAI should be rapidly scaled down in a matter of weeks (MacMartin et al., 2019).”

    From A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk (2021) · cites this paper as MacMartin et al., 2019

  • SAI deployment dependent on software or advanced algorithmic systems would be vulnerable to cyberattack.

    “SAI deployment dependent on any software or advanced algorithmic system (Rolnick et al., 2019; Schroeder de Witt and Hornigold, 2019), which is likely given the high technological and informational demands of deployment (MacMartin et al., 2019), would be vulnerable to cyberattack.”

    From A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk (2021) · cites this paper as MacMartin et al., 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Horton, J., Parker, A., and Keith, D. (2015). Liability for solar geoengineering: Historical precedents, contemporary innovations, and governance possibilities. N.Y.U. Environmental Law Journal, 22.
  2. MacMartin, D. G., Caldeira, K., and Keith, D. W. (2014b). Solar geoengineering to limit rates of change. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. A, 372.
  3. National Academy of Sciences (2015). Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth. The National Academies Press, 500 Fifth St. NW, Washington DC 20001.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacMartin, D. G., Irvine, P. J., Kravitz, B., & Horton, J. B.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
MacMartin, Douglas G.
Venue
Climate Policy
Published
2019-09-23
Volume
19
Issue
10
Pages
1325-1339
ISSN
  • 1469-3062 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-7457
OpenAlex
W2976896012
Cited by
28
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Climate Policy (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Keywords
solar geoengineering, feedback control, detection and attribution, natural variation, uncertainty management, operational decision-making, climate change mitigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review