Cited by 161Planetary Science and ExplorationAstro and Planetary ScienceGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 210 of the 210 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 4 of the 74 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Orbital evidence for more widespread carbonate-bearing rocks on Mars

Open access
Wray, James J., Murchie, Scott L., Bishop, Janice L., Ehlmann, Bethany L., Milliken, Ralph E., Wilhelm, Mary Beth, Seelos, Kimberly D., Chojnacki, Matthew·2016·Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets

Abstract

Abstract Carbonates are key minerals for understanding ancient Martian environments because they are indicators of potentially habitable, neutral‐to‐alkaline water and may be an important reservoir for paleoatmospheric CO 2 . Previous remote sensing studies have identified mostly Mg‐rich carbonates, both in Martian dust and in a Late Noachian rock unit circumferential to the Isidis basin. Here we report evidence for older Fe‐ and/or Ca‐rich carbonates exposed from the subsurface by impact craters and troughs. These carbonates are found in and around the Huygens basin northwest of Hellas, in western Noachis Terra between the Argyre basin and Valles Marineris, and in other isolated locations spread widely across the planet. In all cases they cooccur with or near phyllosilicates, and in Huygens basin specifically they occupy layered rocks exhumed from up to ~5 km depth. We discuss factors that might explain their observed regional distribution, arguments for why carbonates may be even more widespread in Noachian materials than presently appreciated and what could be gained by targeting these carbonates for further study with future orbital or landed missions to Mars.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2015je004972

Cites

210 of 210 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

4 of 74 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 88 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 12
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 55
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
62 of 62
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Impact craters and troughs that expose the carbonates did not significantly alter the carbonate mineralogy or spectral signature.

    “Here we report evidence for older Fe-and/or Ca-rich carbonates exposed from the subsurface by impact craters and troughs.”
    “Most of these Fe/Ca-carbonate detections from orbit occur in materials exposed-by impact or tectonics-from depth.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The global versus regional nature of deep carbonates is uncertain.

    “estimates of Mars' buried carbon reservoir must for now rely upon tenuous assumptions about the global versus regional nature of deep carbonates.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 209 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bishop J. L. S. J.King A. J.Brown andJ. J.Wray(2015) Investigating the chemistry of Martian carbonates using CRISM data Astrobiol. Sci. Conf. Abstract 7285.
  2. Hardie L. A., 1970, The evolution of closed‐basin brines, Mineral. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap., 3, 273
  3. Irwin R. P. III J. J.Wray T. A.Maxwell S. C.Mest andS. T.Hansen(2012) Wind‐eroded stratigraphy on the floor of a Noachian impact crater Noachis Terra Mars Third Int. Conf. on Early Mars Abstract 7066.
  4. 10.1016/j.icarus2014.11.018 · DOI
  5. McEwen A. S. L.Tornabene J.Grant J.Wray andJ.Mustard(2008) Noachian Megabreccia on Mars Eos Trans. AGU 89(53) Fall Meet. Suppl. Abstract P43D‐03.
  6. Seelos F. P., 2012, Planetary Data: A Workshop for Users and Software Developers, 159

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–161 of 161

Metadata

Authors
Wray, J. J., Murchie, S. L., Bishop, J. L., Ehlmann, B. L., Milliken, R. E., Wilhelm, M. B., Seelos, K. D., & Chojnacki, M.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (US)
  • Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • The Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Laboratory Laurel Maryland USA
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Wray, James J.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Published
2016-04
Volume
121
Issue
4
Pages
652-677
ISSN
  • 2169-9097 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-9100
OpenAlex
W2337393115
Cited by
161
References
209
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 8
FWCI
8.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Planets (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
NASA Astrobiology Institute's SETI Institute (15BB01)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Keywords
Mars, Noachian, Hellas basin, Noachis Terra, impact craters, phyllosilicates, paleoatmospheric CO2, orbital remote sensing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review