The DOI matches its Crossref record; 218 of the 220 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 214 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration
Open accessAbstract
Over the coming century humanity may need to find reservoirs to store several trillions of tons of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emitted from fossil fuel combustion, which would otherwise cause dangerous climate change if it were left in the atmosphere. Carbon storage in the ocean as bicarbonate ions (by increasing ocean alkalinity) has received very little attention. Yet recent work suggests sufficient capacity to sequester copious quantities of CO 2 . It may be possible to sequester hundreds of billions to trillions of tons of C without surpassing postindustrial average carbonate saturation states in the surface ocean. When globally distributed, the impact of elevated alkalinity is potentially small and may help ameliorate the effects of ocean acidification. However, the local impact around addition sites may be more acute but is specific to the mineral and technology. The alkalinity of the ocean increases naturally because of rock weathering in which >1.5 mol of carbon are removed from the atmosphere for every mole of magnesium or calcium dissolved from silicate minerals (e.g., wollastonite, olivine, and anorthite) and 0.5 mol for carbonate minerals (e.g., calcite and dolomite). These processes are responsible for naturally sequestering 0.5 billion tons of CO 2 per year. Alkalinity is reduced in the ocean through carbonate mineral precipitation, which is almost exclusively formed from biological activity. Most of the previous work on the biological response to changes in carbonate chemistry have focused on acidifying conditions. More research is required to understand carbonate precipitation at elevated alkalinity to constrain the longevity of carbon storage. A range of technologies have been proposed to increase ocean alkalinity (accelerated weathering of limestone, enhanced weathering, electrochemical promoted weathering, and ocean liming), the cost of which may be comparable to alternative carbon sequestration proposals (e.g., $20–100 tCO 2 −1 ). There are still many unanswered technical, environmental, social, and ethical questions, but the scale of the carbon sequestration challenge warrants research to address these.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review assesses increasing ocean alkalinity as a carbon sequestration route, storing CO₂ as bicarbonate and carbonate ions in the ocean. It finds potentially large capacity and costs that may be comparable to conventional mitigation, but major uncertainties remain about environmental impacts, carbonate precipitation feedbacks, and governance.
Key findings
- The ocean already stores ≈38,000 Gt C, and the paper suggests it may be possible to sequester hundreds of billions to trillions of tonnes of C without surpassing post-industrial average carbonate saturation states in the surface ocean.
- Adding Ca²⁺ or Mg²⁺ can sequester close to 2 moles of C per mole of cation; at 400 ppmv, S = 35, T = 17°C, η = 0.831, implying 0.83 moles of C stored per mole of H⁺ consumed, or 1.66 per mole of Ca²⁺ or Mg²⁺ added. Carbonate mineral dissolution gives smaller net uptake of 0.4 to 0.7.
- If used as the sole destination for all anthropogenic CO₂ over 100–500 years, ocean alkalinity would increase from 2.3 mEq kg⁻¹ to ~3 mEq kg⁻¹, with calcite saturation between 5 and 7.5; average calcite saturation is unlikely to surpass pre-industrial levels, but localized impacts around addition sites may be more acute.
- Proposed technologies include ocean liming, accelerated weathering of limestone, electrochemical splitting, and enhanced weathering; the paper reports costs/energy broadly comparable to alternatives, e.g. 1–10 GJ tCO₂⁻¹ and $50–150 tCO₂⁻¹ in the conclusions, with the abstract citing $20–100 tCO₂⁻¹.
Methods
- This is a review and synthesis of the inorganic ocean carbon sink, covering alkalinity chemistry, ocean carbon cycle processes, modeling studies, mineral-based technologies, environmental impacts, and regulation.
- It draws on published literature, box models and spatially resolved models (e.g. 3-box, Paquay and Zeebe, Ilyina et al., Keller et al., Ferrer-González and Ilyina), technoeconomic comparisons, and proposed experimental scenarios in Table 2.
- No new primary experiments or field data collection are reported; the analysis is narrative and comparative, with quantitative estimates taken from cited studies and model outputs.
Limitations
- Stated: many technical, environmental, social, and ethical questions remain unanswered; research is needed to understand impacts and feasibility, and local impacts are specific to the mineral and technology used.
- Stated: carbonate precipitation at elevated alkalinity is poorly constrained, reaction kinetics are poorly constrained, cost estimates are largely speculative, and monitoring may require years to detect alkalinity changes above background seasonal variability.
- Evident: the review relies heavily on models and desk-top or bench-scale studies; upscaling to billions of tons CO₂ per year is described as a considerable challenge, and model assumptions such as instant complete olivine dissolution or uniform alkalinity addition limit real-world inference.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 214 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Dissolution of a mole of Ca 2+ or Mg 2+ sequesters close to 2 moles of C (see section 2).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > AT
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIn the paper
“In practice the uptake is 1.4 to 1.7 molecules because of the presence of some CO3 2-, (i.e. a reduction of uptake efficiency, η, by 15% -30%), depending on temperature, salinity and pCO2 (equation 23; see supporting information for derivation [Dickson, 1990]).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.3 The combined impact of weathering and ocean alkalinity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dickson, 1990
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Addition of sufficient Ca 2+ to fully compensate for present anthropogenic emission of 10 Gt C a -1 therefore requires addition of 20 Gt Ca 2+ a -1 .”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 3.1 Box models
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The increased alkalinity flux in the right hand panels prevents the significant changes in atmosphere CO2 and ocean pH seen in the left-hand figures.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 3.1 Box models
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even if considering the surface ocean alone this annual addition is less than a 0.3% increase in total Ca 2+ .”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 3.1 Box models
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The large volume of the ocean and its high Ca 2+ concentration, however, mean that the oceanic perturbation is very much smaller and only a 0.9 mmoles kg -1 increase in Ca 2+ is required.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 3.1 Box models
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There would be approximately 200 Mt of Si released for every Gt of olivine added to the ocean, so it is not surprising that a significant fertilization effect is observed.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > Ferrer-Gonzalez and Ilyina
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is ≈20 times the annual riverine input of Ca 2+ , a very significant perturbation, and obviously a very substantial undertaking in engineering terms.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 3.1 Box models
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, this work suggests some of the proposals to have a range of energy requirements and financial costs comparable to more widely studied alternatives (e.g., 1-10 GJ tCO2 -1 , $50 -150 tCO2 -1 ).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“On long-timescales (~100-200 ka) the ocean and weathering will reduce atmospheric CO2 to values close to pre-industrial [Lord et al., 2016].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > AT
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lord et al., 2016
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- Probably not a substantial claim. 180
- It may state two separate claims as one. 129
In the paper
“He showed that a solution:gas flow ratio of 8 was sufficient to capture 85 % of the CO2 from a 10 % gas at 1 atm.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 1.2 History of research investigating ocean alkalinity as an engineered carbon sink
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rau 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because the dissolution of CaCO3 releases a C atom, the net impact of such dissolution on CO2 uptake is smaller (0.4 to 0.7) than Ca 2+ ions released from silicate weathering, but it is important to note the rather counter-intuitive fact that dissolving CaCO3 in seawater leads to uptake of CO2 from the atmosphere.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.3 The combined impact of weathering and ocean alkalinity
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For pCO2 = 400 ppmv, S = 35 %, and T = 17°C, η = 0.831.This implies that 0.83 moles of carbon are stored per mole of H + consumed, or 1.66 per mole of Ca 2+ or Mg 2+ added to the ocean.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.3 The combined impact of weathering and ocean alkalinity
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They also show the scale of change in alkalinity in the surface and deep ocean that results from this intervention, and the significant changes in lysocline depth that arise both from anthropogenic C emission, and from alkalinity addition.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 3.1 Box models
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The right hand panels also illustrate the long-term effects on ocean saturation due to continued addition of alkalinity.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 3.1 Box models
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Assuming addition of Ca 2+ : adding one mole of Ca 2+ to a single-box ocean causes an increase in HCO3 - and CO3 2-and the uptake of ≈1.7 moles of CO2 (see section 2.3).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 3.1 Box models
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This figure shows the decrease in Ωcalcite that has already occurred due to anthropogenic CO2 emissions, and the further decrease expected as CO2 emissions continue.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > Ferrer-Gonzalez and Ilyina
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Yet, recent work suggests sufficient capacity to sequester copious quantities of CO2.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In this context, the techno-economic feasibility of Ocean Liming was re-examined by Renforth et al., [2013], who suggest similar energy and financial requirements to other air capture technologies.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 1.2 History of research investigating ocean alkalinity as an engineered carbon sink
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Renforth et al., 2013
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“While 136 countries have ratified the agreement, the pledged contributions are insufficient to prevent a 2°C temperature rise [Rogelj et al. 2016].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > AT
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rogelj et al. 2016
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Many future scenarios that keep climate change below 2°C do so not only by limiting the use of carbon, but by using technology to limit the impact of carbon use on the atmospheric concentration.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > AT
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fuss et al., 2014
- Not checked yetcites McLaren 2012
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“On one hand, spreading natural minerals on the land surface [reviewed by Hartmann et al., 2013] potentially allows the naturally corrosive chemistry in soil pore waters [Manning and Renforth 2013] to be used to accelerate dissolution kinetics.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 1.2 History of research investigating ocean alkalinity as an engineered carbon sink
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hartmann et al., 2013
- Not checked yetcites Manning and Renforth 2013
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Alternatively, Manning [2008] and Manning et al., [2013] suggest that solution chemistry in soil pore-waters may promote the precipitation of carbonate minerals, which has been demonstrated widely in anthropogenic soils [Renforth et al., 2009;Washbourne et al., 2015Washbourne et al., , 2012]].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 1.2 History of research investigating ocean alkalinity as an engineered carbon sink
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Manning 2008
- Not checked yetcites Manning et al., 2013
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, both Kheshgi [1995] and Renforth et al., [2013] recognized that the production of lime from limestone may not be the most efficient process for increasing ocean alkalinity due to the large energy and CO2 burden of calcination.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 1.2 History of research investigating ocean alkalinity as an engineered carbon sink
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kheshgi 1995
- Not checked yetcites Renforth et al., 2013
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Chou et al., [2015] investigated the operation of a two stage AWL reactor in which gas-liquid equilibration occurs prior to solid-liquid equilibration, and found lower carbon sequestration efficiencies of <50 %.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 1.2 History of research investigating ocean alkalinity as an engineered carbon sink
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chou et al., 2015
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Carbon storage in the ocean as bicarbonate ions (by increasing ocean alkalinity) has received very little attention.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The oceans contain ≈38,000 Gt C, some 45 times more than the present atmosphere, and oceanic uptake has already consumed close to 40% of anthropogenic C emissions [Sabine and Tanhua, 2010].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > AT
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sabine and Tanhua, 2010
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, Rau and Caldeira [1999] point out that the once-through cooling water consumed within some power stations equates to around 400 tons per ton of CO2 emitted, thus lowering the additional water requirements of AWL.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 1.2 History of research investigating ocean alkalinity as an engineered carbon sink
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rau and Caldeira 1999
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Caldeira and Rau [2000] suggested the cost and environmental impact compares favorably to direct injection of CO2 in the deep ocean.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 1.2 History of research investigating ocean alkalinity as an engineered carbon sink
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Caldeira and Rau 2000
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the local impact around addition sites may be more acute but is specific to the mineral and technology.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > Abstract
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The dissolution of minerals in a carbonic acid solution is relatively slow compared to stronger acids.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 1.2 History of research investigating ocean alkalinity as an engineered carbon sink
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The key limitation of this process is the amount of water required, in which thousands of tons of seawater are needed per ton of CO2 sequestered.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 1.2 History of research investigating ocean alkalinity as an engineered carbon sink
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The ocean naturally stores a very large quantity of carbon as dissolved carbonate and bicarbonate ions”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, contacting carbonate minerals, seawater and power station flue gas (10 % CO2 at 1 atm), would result in increased alkalinity in the effluent discharged back to the ocean.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 1.2 History of research investigating ocean alkalinity as an engineered carbon sink
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“The representative concentration pathway (RCP) that results in a likely temperature rise by 2100 below 2°C is RCP2.6 (Figure 1, see [van Vuuren et al., 2011]), which suggests a cumulative emission of 880 Gt C”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > AT
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites van Vuuren et al., 2011
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notionally, the products of dissolution (including increased alkalinity of rainwater) are transported to the ocean via runoff, rivers and shallow groundwater.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 1.2 History of research investigating ocean alkalinity as an engineered carbon sink
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Reactions in the open environment could have a time constraint on the order of years (10 5 -10 6 times longer) because of the much larger volume.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 1.2 History of research investigating ocean alkalinity as an engineered carbon sink
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The use of enhanced ocean alkalinity for C storage was first proposed by Kheshgi [1995].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 1.2 History of research investigating ocean alkalinity as an engineered carbon sink
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kheshgi 1995
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“An alternative proposal was developed independently by Rau and Caldeira [1999], who suggested that the dissolution of carbonate minerals (e.g., CaCO3) exposed to waste flue gas CO2 and seawater (Accelerated Weathering of Limestone; AWL) as a means for increasing ocean alkalinity.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 1.2 History of research investigating ocean alkalinity as an engineered carbon sink
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rau and Caldeira 1999
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Rau (2011) provided results from the operation of a bench-scale experiment, which demonstrated high levels of CO2 sequestration largely as a function of the solution/gas volume ratio within the reactor.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 1.2 History of research investigating ocean alkalinity as an engineered carbon sink
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rau 2011
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Raising the partial pressure of CO2 to >5,000 µatm (at a total pressure of 1 atm) in contact with seawater, creates the conditions in which carbonate minerals can spontaneously dissolve.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 1.2 History of research investigating ocean alkalinity as an engineered carbon sink
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When globally distributed, the impact of elevated alkalinity is potentially small, and may help ameliorate the effects of ocean acidification.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The high energy costs of creating lime, and research focus on other forms of climate change mitigation, has meant that the proposal was largely disregarded in the 1990's and early 2000's.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 1.2 History of research investigating ocean alkalinity as an engineered carbon sink
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is important to note that these processes are distinct from”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2. Ocean Carbon Cycle
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Seawater in the surface ocean is supersaturated with respect to calcite by a factor of about 4 times (and aragonite by about 2.5 times), but the presence of other elements in seawater prevent inorganic precipitation of calcite in almost all oceanic settings [Berner 1975].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.4 The oceanic alkalinity cycle
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berner 1975
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many species of plant and animal have, however, developed chemical approaches to overcome this limitation and precipitate CaCO3 as calcite or aragonite, leading to removal of Ca 2+ (and alkalinity) from the surface ocean.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.4 The oceanic alkalinity cycle
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If carbonate minerals (e.g., in limestone) dissolve on land and subsequently re-precipitate, there is no net effect on CO2, but if the Ca 2+ reaches the ocean, the resulting increase in alkalinity leads to uptake of CO2.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.3 The combined impact of weathering and ocean alkalinity
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Biological activity also accelerates weathering [e.g., Cockell 2011]”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.1 Weathering of silicate minerals
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cockell 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These weathering reactions are exothermic, but do proceed slowly due to the significant kinetic limitation created by the strong bonding found in silicate minerals.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.1 Weathering of silicate minerals
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Seawater has a high alkalinity (2.5 mEq kg -1 ) which, coupled to the large volume of the ocean, make oceanic inorganic C by far the largest C reservoir in the ocean-atmosphere-biosphere system (≈42,000 Gt C; [Ciais et al., 2014]).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.2 Alkalinity control of ocean C content
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ciais et al., 2014
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“If ocean HCO3 - and CO3 2-were the sole repository of the carbon, then others argue that such an approach may be limited by the saturation state or environmental pH limits of the rain/river water [Köhler et al., 2011].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 1.2 History of research investigating ocean alkalinity as an engineered carbon sink
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Köhler et al., 2011
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The principle factors controlling weathering rate are the temperature, run-off (to provide water to remove reaction products), and the available surface area (i.e. the grainsize of the rock or mineral [West et al., 2005]).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.1 Weathering of silicate minerals
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites West et al., 2005
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These minerals break down slowly at the surface in a variety of reactions together referred to as chemical weathering.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.1 Weathering of silicate minerals
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Such alkalinity-induced changes in partitioning of C between atmosphere and ocean are thought to play an important role in controlling climate change on timescales of 1 ka and longer [e.g., Zeebe 2012].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.5 The oceanic alkalinity cycle
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Zeebe 2012
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On geological timescales, this removal flux is balanced by volcanic sources of CO2 from the Earth interior.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.1 Weathering of silicate minerals
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As alkalinity increases, more dissociation of carbonic acid occurs, and greater amounts of C are held in solution as HCO3 -and CO3 2-(see Box 1 for details).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.2 Alkalinity control of ocean C content
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On timescales longer than the circulation of the ocean (i.e.>1 ka), carbonate compensation alters the alkalinity of the whole ocean and acts as a natural buffer to offset changes in atmospheric CO2 created by imbalances elsewhere in the C cycle.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.4 The oceanic alkalinity cycle
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many silicate minerals were formed at high temperature and are unstable in the presence of water at the temperature and pressure conditions of the surface Earth.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.1 Weathering of silicate minerals
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, at this stage, there is nothing that warrants their exclusion from research and policy development, particularly considering that mineral weathering and ocean alkalinity production is the primary mechanism whereby nature will eventually consume and store anthropogenic CO2.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 1.2 History of research investigating ocean alkalinity as an engineered carbon sink
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Other silicate minerals involve a full array of elements and produce a range of other endproducts, frequently including clay minerals, but, as above, are often characterized by the consumption of CO2 (see Table 1 for examples).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.1 Weathering of silicate minerals
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For instance, Köhler et al., [2013] investigated the direct addition of olivine particles to the surface ocean.As it is imperative that the added particles dissolve within the mixed layer, they suggest that crushing and grinding to a diameter of 1 µm is necessary.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 1.2 History of research investigating ocean alkalinity as an engineered carbon sink
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Köhler et al., 2013
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Several inter-related processes are responsible for inorganic removal of CO2 from the atmosphere: weathering of silicate and carbonate rocks, reaction with carbonate sediments, and the alkalinity, or buffering capacity, of the ocean.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2. Ocean Carbon Cycle
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, such changes in the weathering/volcanism balance are fundamental in controlling the climate system, and the temperature dependence of weathering rate provides a long-term negative feedback on climate change to keep Earth's long-term climate in a relatively narrow range [Berner et al., 1983].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.1 Weathering of silicate minerals
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Berner et al., 1983
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“That process also plays a critical role in the C cycle and is the focus of C-sequestration schemes involving ocean fertilization [e.g., Wallace et al., 2010;Williamson et al., 2012].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2. Ocean Carbon Cycle
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wallace et al., 2010
- Not checked yetcites Williamson et al., 2012
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Imbalances between the input and removal fluxes of alkalinity can result in changes in global oceanic alkalinity and therefore the capacity of the ocean to store C.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.5 The oceanic alkalinity cycle
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If, on the other hand, the cations are transported to the ocean they increase the alkalinity, and lead to transfer of CO2 to HCO3 -and CO3 2-.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.3 The combined impact of weathering and ocean alkalinity
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Remineralization of settling organic C at depth releases CO2 and decreases the pH of seawater.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.4 The oceanic alkalinity cycle
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The total removal of CO2 from the atmosphere by natural weathering of silicate minerals may be as high as ≈0.25 Gt C a -1 [Suchet and Probst 1995;Gaillardet et al., 1999;Hartmann et al., 2009] but is poorly constrained due to difficulty in separating fluxes from weathering silicates and carbonates, and may be significantly smaller [Liu et al., 2011].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.1 Weathering of silicate minerals
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Suchet and Probst 1995
- Not checked yetcites Gaillardet et al., 1999
- Not checked yetcites Hartmann et al., 2009
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is highly unlikely that any of the above proposals (e.g., Figure 2) will form humanity's sole response to climate change.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 1.2 History of research investigating ocean alkalinity as an engineered carbon sink
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Seasonal variation of up to 80-110 µeq kg -1 are also seen, resulting from changes in vertical mixing [Lee et al., 2006], riverine inputs [Cai et al., 2010], and especially primary production [Wolf-Gladrow et al., 2007].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.4 The oceanic alkalinity cycle
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lee et al., 2006
- Not checked yetcites Cai et al., 2010
- Not checked yetcites Wolf-Gladrow et al., 2007
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The deep ocean is characterized by dissolution of CaCO3 and an increase in alkalinity (Figure 3 B ;and Andersson [2014]).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.4 The oceanic alkalinity cycle
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Andersson 2014
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Similarly, pH was generally returned to values similar to pre-industrial in much of the ocean, but was elevated around application regions, and calcite saturation similarly increased (Ωcalcite ≈ 20).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 3.2 Spatially resolved models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ilyina et al., [2013]
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No single model is yet accepted to explain glacial-interglacial atmospheric pCO2 cycles, but it is clear that the CO2 removed from the atmosphere during glacials was stored in the ocean.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.5 The oceanic alkalinity cycle
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This carbonate compensation buffered a significant fraction of the change in CO2 and occurred on a timescale of <10,000, short geologically, but still a slow response relative to human timescales.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.5 The oceanic alkalinity cycle
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“So the major way in which alkalinity changes become important is changes in precipitation and particularly dissolution of CaCO3 (i.e. through carbonate compensation).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.5 The oceanic alkalinity cycle
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Geochemical proxies have been developed to reconstruct past aspects of the ocean carbonate system, with two, measured in marine carbonates, seeing the greatest use: carbonate B isotope composition systematically reflects changing concentrations of B species with pH, and an empirical relationship is observed between carbonate B/Ca and the concentration of CO3 2-.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.5 The oceanic alkalinity cycle
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Carbonate precipitation is a key feature in the physiology of a large number of ocean dwelling organisms [Addadi et al., 2006;Müller 2011].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.2 Biological carbonate precipitation and dissolution
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Addadi et al., 2006
- Not checked yetcites Müller 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“At the PETM, the large increase in CO2 in the ocean resulting from C release led to significant decreases in ocean pH and shoaling of the lysocline to increase ocean alkalinity [Zachos et al., 2005].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.5 The oceanic alkalinity cycle
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Zachos et al., 2005
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The oceanic residence time of Ca 2+ with respect to riverine input is greater than 1000 ka (Figure 3A), on which timescale the balance between volcanic degassing and sedimentary removal of C becomes a dominant control.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.5 The oceanic alkalinity cycle
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The models shown on this figure demonstrate the potential advantages to ocean saturation state of alkalinity addition.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > Ferrer-Gonzalez and Ilyina
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“For instance, some studies suggest increased risk to coral ecosystems when Ωaragonite falls below 3 (Ωcalcite ≈ 4.5) in the open ocean surrounding reefs [Ricke et al., 2013].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > Ferrer-Gonzalez and Ilyina
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ricke et al., 2013
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, spontaneous nucleation is strongly inhibited in seawater, and carbonate production is thought to be largely biologically controlled, although there is no estimate of the relative proportions.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.1 The saturation state of carbonate minerals in the ocean
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Alkalinity increased, as expected, to between 2.3 and 3.0 mEq kg -1 for most of the ocean, but rising up to 5.5 mEq kg -1 in the north Atlantic and North Pacific where alkalinity addition was imposed.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 3.2 Spatially resolved models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ilyina et al., [2013]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such higher alkalinity would increase storage of CO2 in the ocean, and contribute to the decrease of atmospheric pCO2 known to be a significant cause of glacial cooling.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.5 The oceanic alkalinity cycle
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Through studying these natural changes in ocean alkalinity, it may be possible to constrain future changes in ocean chemistry from artificial changes in ocean alkalinity.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.5 The oceanic alkalinity cycle
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Olivine also contains iron (as fayilite, Fe2SiO4), which may also fertilize biological activity.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > Ferrer-Gonzalez and Ilyina
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several processes may have led to higher ocean alkalinity during the glacial periods of the Pleistocene (e.g., the last glacial, 20 ka ago).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.5 The oceanic alkalinity cycle
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This simple one-box approach demonstrates the possibility of substantial uptake of C to the ocean with relatively small changes in the ocean, but also the scale of the effort required to effect significant alkalinity addition.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 3.1 Box models
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The resulting decrease in CaCO3 precipitation, and probable erosion and dissolution of old reefs, would increase global ocean alkalinity [Opdyke and Walker 1992].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.5 The oceanic alkalinity cycle
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Opdyke and Walker 1992
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such a model demonstrates the expectation that long-term alkalinity addition could compensate for anthropogenic C addition, and could prevent the associated decrease in ocean pH.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 3.1 Box models
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Another process, but operating in the deep ocean, stems from changes in ocean circulation in the Atlantic leading to sluggish deep waters containing substantially more re-mineralized CO2.This would lower deep-water pH to raise the lysocline, and thereby add alkalinity by dissolution of CaCO3 [Boyle 1988;Sigman et al., 2010].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.5 The oceanic alkalinity cycle
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boyle 1988
- Not checked yetcites Sigman et al., 2010
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The handful of modeling studies investigating an intentional increase of ocean alkalinity have been useful in broadly defining the relationship between carbon sequestration extent and the impact on the ocean carbonate system.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > Ferrer-Gonzalez and Ilyina
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Despite imposing a uniform distribution of alkalinity addition, the ocean response was more marked in some regions, notably the Arctic, where pH climbed to 8.6 and Ωcalcite ≈ 10, and the tropics where Ωcalcite was also high.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > Ferrer-Gonzalez and Ilyina
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ferrer-Gonzalez and Ilyina [2016]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One such process, operating in the surface ocean, is that lower glacial sea level would leave less continental shelf area for formation of carbonate reefs.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.5 The oceanic alkalinity cycle
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As for the simple box models, this spatially-resolved modeling, indicates the general success of alkalinity addition in generating ocean uptake of CO2, but highlights clearly the challenges imposed by extreme ocean changes (e.g., elevated pH and carbonate saturation) in regions of alkalinity addition.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 3.2 Spatially resolved models
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Alkalinity changes may have played a role in this storage (see Sigman and Boyle [2000] for a summary of glacial-interglacial pCO2 mechanisms).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.5 The oceanic alkalinity cycle
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sigman and Boyle 2000
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Surprisingly, while there is elevated alkalinity, the model predicts a decrease in CaCO3 export and an increase in organic carbon export due to the fertilization effect of dissolved silica on diatoms.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > Ferrer-Gonzalez and Ilyina
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Köhler et al., [2013]
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Barker et al., [2006] suggest that elevated organic carbon export associated with carbonate production at the surface, may offset any CO2 release, either through sequestration of organic carbon into sediments/interior ocean, or through enhanced dissolution of sediments from increased oxidation of organic carbon.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.1 The saturation state of carbonate minerals in the ocean
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Barker et al., [2006]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The residence time of dissolved inorganic carbon in the whole ocean is around 100 ka, which would effectively form a permanent storage reservoir on human timescales.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.1 The saturation state of carbonate minerals in the ocean
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, it is unlikely to completely reverse the effectiveness of alkalinity input because the fluxes of carbonate in the natural cycle are smaller than those that those required on human timescales.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.1 The saturation state of carbonate minerals in the ocean
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Olivine (forsterite rich, Mg2SiO4) dissolution increases total alkalinity with a molar 1:4 olivine/alkalinity ratio) but also releases silicon.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > Ferrer-Gonzalez and Ilyina
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“One such study indicates higher alkalinity in the glacial ocean [Rickaby et al., 2010], though this is not observed in all ocean regions [Zeebe and Marchitto 2010].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 2.5 The oceanic alkalinity cycle
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rickaby et al., 2010
- Not checked yetcites Zeebe and Marchitto 2010
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A deeper CCD will lead to an increase in the extent of sediment exposed to elevated saturation states, and notionally an increase in calcification and export, and thus increase the net removal of CaCO3 from the ocean.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.1 The saturation state of carbonate minerals in the ocean
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Phytoplanktonic calcifiers are responsible for a considerable proportion of particulate inorganic carbonate production in the surface ocean.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.2 Biological carbonate precipitation and dissolution
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“But initial studies by Pytkowicz [1965] suggest that highly elevated saturation states were required to spontaneously precipitate calcium carbonate from seawater, confirmed to be between Ωcalcite ≈ 19 and 25 by Morse and He [1993].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.3 Abiotic Carbonate Precipitation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Pytkowicz [1965]
- Not checked yetcites Morse and He [1993]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Although, the hydrated calcium carbonate polymorph ikaite (CaCO3 .6H2O) has been found to be stable at near zero temperatures [Lu et al., 2012].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.3 Abiotic Carbonate Precipitation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lu et al., 2012
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Those that have little control generally follow an abiotic relationship between Ω and calcification rate (Figure 11, see below).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.2 Biological carbonate precipitation and dissolution
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The dissolution of carbonate minerals is an important component of the natural carbon cycle (0.1 -0.2 Gt C a -1 ), which may be impacted by elevated alkalinity.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.2 Biological carbonate precipitation and dissolution
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The 'marine snow' product has a defined PIC: particulate organic carbon (POC) ratio (the ratio between particulate inorganic and organic carbon, typically 1:4).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.2 Biological carbonate precipitation and dissolution
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Species of coral express a wide degree of control on the chemistry of their calcifying fluids.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.2 Biological carbonate precipitation and dissolution
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Generally, the rate of dissolution follows an abiotic relationship with Ω, which will likely be impeded by elevated alkalinity.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.2 Biological carbonate precipitation and dissolution
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although coral reefs constitute only a small proportion of the ocean they are responsible for up to 50% of the global CaCO3 production [Mackenzie and Andersson 2013;Smith and Kinsey 1976].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.2 Biological carbonate precipitation and dissolution
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mackenzie and Andersson 2013
- Not checked yetcites Smith and Kinsey 1976
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While corals are responsible for carbonate production, they are also the site for dissolution (e.g., through raised pCO2 from respiration).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.2 Biological carbonate precipitation and dissolution
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In these experiments, alkalinity levels increased by around 0.1 and 0.05 mEq kg -1 for S. Herrmanni and H. leucospilota respectively (70-85 % due to the accelerated dissolution of carbonate, the remainder due to ammonia secretion).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.2 Biological carbonate precipitation and dissolution
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schneider et al., [2011]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As such, research investigating species and ecosystem response to ocean acidification has produced variable results [Ries et al., 2009].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.2 Biological carbonate precipitation and dissolution
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ries et al., 2009
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The response of corals to elevated saturation states is poorly constrained.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.2 Biological carbonate precipitation and dissolution
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, increased biological carbon export (and subsequent remineralization) could decrease the dissolved oxygen content in the water column (see section 7), or result in increased weathering in underlying sediments [Barker et al., 2006].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.2 Biological carbonate precipitation and dissolution
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Barker et al., 2006
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Temperature is thought to control the mineralogy of the precipitating phase.In seawater, calcite nucleates at temperatures <8°C, and above this aragonite is the precipitating phase [Morse et al., 1997].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.3 Abiotic Carbonate Precipitation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Morse et al., 1997
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Whereas, some coral species have evolved a capacity for buffering against lower Ω [McCulloch et al., 2012].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.2 Biological carbonate precipitation and dissolution
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McCulloch et al., 2012
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In these experiments there was little change in particulate inorganic carbon production (for Gephyrocapsa oceanica and C. pelagicus at pCO2 = 1,800 ppmv, and Ωcalcite = 13), whereas variations in organic carbon fixation were detected.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.2 Biological carbonate precipitation and dissolution
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rickaby et al., 2010
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Others suggest that carbonate precipitation on re-suspended sediment to be the cause of the whiting events [Bustos-Serrano et al., 2009;Morse et al., 2003].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.3 Abiotic Carbonate Precipitation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bustos-Serrano et al., 2009
- Not checked yetcites Morse et al., 2003
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“By undertaking two experimental regimes in which pCO2 is manipulated while allowing pH to vary or maintaining it at a constant value, the results decouple the impact of AT and [CO2] on inorganic carbon production, and suggest a plateau at around AT = 4.9 mEq kg -1 .”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.2 Biological carbonate precipitation and dissolution
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bach et al., [2011]
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Increasing the concentration of magnesium relative to calcium is thought to increase the stoichiometric solubility constant of calcite resulting in a decrease in the [Ca 2+ ] [CO3 2-] ion activity product (IAP, equation 25; adapted from Mucci and Morse [1983])”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.3 Abiotic Carbonate Precipitation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mucci and Morse [1983]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Bijma et al., [2002] suggest a linear relationship between shell mass and [CO3 2-] (SW = 29.5 + 0.051[CO3 2-]), which can be expressed as a function that relates the change in relative growth rate (ΔR) to the change saturation state (%ΔR = 2.0 ΔΩcalcite, assuming constant [Ca 2+ ] = 10 mmoles kg -1 , current Ωcalcite = 4.8, pKsp = 5.62, current core-top shell mass of 38 µg).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.2 Biological carbonate precipitation and dissolution
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bijma et al., [2002]
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“SO4 2-is present at concentrations of approximately 28 mmoles kg -1 in seawater, but substantially smaller concentrations are sufficient to impede carbonate formation [Busenberg and Plummer 1985].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.3 Abiotic Carbonate Precipitation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Busenberg and Plummer 1985
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This relationship is thought to be valid between phosphate concentrations of 1 and 100 µmoles kg -1 .”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.3 Abiotic Carbonate Precipitation
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, it is possible that a lower abiotic precipitation rate is presently masked by a larger biological signal.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.3 Abiotic Carbonate Precipitation
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Walter and Morse [1985] determined the surface area of shallow seawater sediments to be between 0.1 and 24.0 m 2 g -1 , although samples were limited to size fraction >37 μm, which would exclude smaller particles with a larger surface area to mass ratio.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.3 Abiotic Carbonate Precipitation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Walter and Morse [1985]
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“After dewatering, the precipitated magnesite could be fed into a kiln/ slaking system to produce brucite (Mg(OH)2) (equation 29), which could be used for ocean liming (equation 30).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5. Production processes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Renforth and Kruger [2013]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In extended duration experiments Pokrovsky [1998] investigated the induction time required for spontaneous CaCO3 (aragonite) nucleation, which is proportional to the saturation state (equation 27)”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.3 Abiotic Carbonate Precipitation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Pokrovsky [1998]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Where A is 7.207 and n is -3.784 for [Mg 2+ ]/[Ca 2+ ] ratio of 5.3 at 20°C (Figure 13).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.3 Abiotic Carbonate Precipitation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Pokrovsky [1998]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Kheshgi [1995] first proposed adding lime (CaO) or portlandite (Ca(OH)2) to the surface ocean.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5. Production processes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kheshgi [1995]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Morse and He [1993] suggest that a calcite saturation state of >19 is required for nucleation in seawater at 25°C.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.3 Abiotic Carbonate Precipitation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Morse and He [1993]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Renforth et al., [2013] also explored the use of steam flash calcination and solar calcination, both of which could potentially reduce the costs of lime production (4 and 2 GJ t CO2 respectively).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5. Production processes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Renforth et al., [2013]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This could equate to a carbonate formation rate of between 0.01 and 14.3 Gt C y -1 in the surface ocean (~300x10 6 km 2 , 60 m deep) for a volumetric surface area between 10 -6.3 and 10 -3.2 m 2 l -1 .”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.3 Abiotic Carbonate Precipitation
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Renforth and Kruger [2013] investigated the possibility of using forsterite rich olivine (Mg2SiO4) as a feedstock for a coupled mineral carbonation ocean liming process (Figure 15).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5. Production processes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Renforth and Kruger [2013]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While biological carbonate precipitation depends on numerous factors, the abiotic precipitation follows a predicable relationship with Ω, and (assuming the lower end member) would increase from 0.01 to 0.4 Gt C y -1 for an increase in Ωcalcite from its current value to 10 (a 20% increase of carbonate production).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.3 Abiotic Carbonate Precipitation
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The lower end member of the abiotic precipitation rate range is used for the projected increase in carbonate production.
In the paper
“They suggested that lime or dolime production in an oxy-fuel fired kiln with CCS, together with the associated energy costs of raw material preparation and ocean disposal, would require between 6 and 10 GJ per net ton of CO2 sequestered.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5. Production processes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Renforth et al., [2013]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similar to seeded precipitation, it is possible that spontaneous nucleation occurs in the surface ocean, but is masked by a larger biological signal, and an increase in carbonate saturation state may accelerate these processes to have a significant impact on the overall carbon cycle.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.3 Abiotic Carbonate Precipitation
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“pKc* is thought to vary between 6.59 and 6.27 for [Mg 2+ ]/[Ca 2+ ] between 0 and 20.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.3 Abiotic Carbonate Precipitation
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Rather than a threshold saturation state to induce carbonate precipitation, Pokrovsky [1998] suggests an induction time of around 2 months for Ωaragonite ≈ 4 decreasing to around 1 week for Ωaragonite ≈ 7, and 9 hours for Ωaragonite = 15.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 4.3 Abiotic Carbonate Precipitation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Pokrovsky [1998]
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The evolved CO2 is recycled back into the mineral carbonation reactor.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5. Production processes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Renforth and Kruger [2013]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“however Rau [2008] suggests the addition of the high pH solution to the ocean as the mechanism for ocean alkalinity increase.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.3 Electrochemical splitting
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rau [2008]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This requirement will increase once inefficiencies are accounted for.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.5 Upscaling production
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is possible that the portfolio of climate change mitigation technologies will contain considerably more than 7 or 19 different measures”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.5 Upscaling production
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AWL could be relevant to air capture if applied to mitigation of CO2 from electricity production via biomass combustion (i.e. an alternative storage mechanism for biomass energy carbon capture and storage).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.2 Accelerated Weathering of Limestone
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“An approach was proposed by Davies [2015], in which an MgCl2 rich brine is thermally decomposed into magnesium oxide and hydrochloric acid, which requires around 0.8 GJ of electrical and 13 GJ of thermal energy per t CO2 sequestered.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.3 Electrochemical splitting
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Davies [2015]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The energy requirements for this may be around 5 GJ(electrical) per t CO2 consumed, which to be CO2-emissions-negative must be powered by non-fossil-derived electricity.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.3 Electrochemical splitting
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, a once-through seawater cooled, 500 MW plant pumps some 20 m 3 s -1 of seawater, meaning that around 6% of the plant's CO2 could theoretically be converted to seawater alkalinity without new pumping.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.2 Accelerated Weathering of Limestone
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“which is, for example, two orders of magnitude greater than the largest seawater reverse osmosis facilities (1 -5 m 3 s -1 [Lior 2012]), and an order of magnitude greater than the largest sewage treatment works (e.g., the Atotonilco el Alto treatment plant, 35 m 3 s -1 [Mendoza 2012]).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.2 Accelerated Weathering of Limestone
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lior 2012 source
- Not checked yetcites Mendoza 2012
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The majority of this production capacity was created in China, which had an annual compound production growth of 11.5 % between 2000 and 2012 [USGS, 2014].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.5 Upscaling production
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites USGS, 2014
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For instance, Pacala and Socolow [2004] chose annual emissions 'wedges' of 1 Gt C a -1 by 2050 (each wedge mitigating around 14% of their business as usual CO2 emissions scenario) by upscaling known mitigation strategies.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.5 Upscaling production
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Pacala and Socolow [2004]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the predicted financial and energy costs are variable, and at this stage largely speculative, they suggest a level of competitiveness with 'conventional' methods of mitigation.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.4 Comparative Cost Estimate
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and notionally reduces the overall cost by ~60 -80 % (from additional CO2 draw-down per mole of base added).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5. Production processes
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The volume ratio between liquid and gas in the reactor has a strong influence on capture efficiency, too little water in the reactor and there is insufficient carbonate solubility to remove CO2 from the gas phase.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.2 Accelerated Weathering of Limestone
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Seawater, natural or artificial brines could be the source of the electrolyte, which would negate the use of freshwater/desalination (although this would require the treatment of H2 and Cl2 produced)”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.3 Electrochemical splitting
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This chlor-alkali method has been used industrially for over 100 years to produce NaOH from seawater and brines [Brinkmann et al., 2014].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.3 Electrochemical splitting
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Brinkmann et al., 2014
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Rau [2008] proposed an alternative method that uses a CaCO3 solution as the electrolyte (Figure 18), in which acid conditions produced around the anode dissolve CaCO3.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.3 Electrochemical splitting
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rau [2008]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“As Davies [2015] suggests, this proposal is probably most suitable for the treatment of desalination reject brines using solar energy, the global potential of which is on the order of 1 Mt CO2 a -1 .”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.3 Electrochemical splitting
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Davies [2015]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The global cement industry extracts around 7 billion tons of raw material (mainly limestone, shale and/or clay), which are ground and processed in a kiln, and the finished product (4.2 billion tons of cement a -1 ), is distributed locally.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.5 Upscaling production
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“While there is considerable potential for AWL, (Rau et al, [2007] suggests a minimum cost of <$10 per t CO2 via use of waste limestone and recycled once-through power plant cooling seawater)”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.2 Accelerated Weathering of Limestone
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rau et al, [2007]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Assuming no efficiency losses, the energy requirements of electrolysis (1.8 GJ per t CO2) is completely met by the exergy ('available' energy) destruction in the fuel cell and during acid neutralization (1.9 GJ per t CO2).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.3 Electrochemical splitting
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- The authors state this as an assumption: There are no efficiency losses in electrolysis, fuel cell generation, and acid neutralization.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A consequence of the wedge approach is that it has conceptually defined the scale at which a mitigation technology should be able to achieve.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.5 Upscaling production
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is particularly important when considering technologies that propose to store CO2 in another part of the Earth system (or in geological reservoirs), where the capacity of the sink may be limited, and the total requirements of storage could be on the order of trillions of t of C.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.5 Upscaling production
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In 1960 global cement production was around 0.3 Gt, in 2014 it was 4.2 Gt.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.5 Upscaling production
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, it is likely that the Mg(OH)2 will need to be relatively pure for ocean liming to minimize biological impact from Fe and Si that may be present.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5. Production processes
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In such a solution the CO3 2-ions would migrate towards the anode, protonate, and degas as CO2.The Ca 2+ cations would migrate towards the cathode to produce a high pH Ca(OH)2 rich solution.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.3 Electrochemical splitting
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rau [2008]
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Humanity could emit between 880 (RCP 2.6) and ~thousands of Gt C by the end of the century (section 1).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.5 Upscaling production
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“many of them could well be more feasible at hundreds of Mt C a -1 scale (solving 1 -5 % of the emission mitigation requirements).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.5 Upscaling production
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Langer et al., [2009] suggest that 71% of US power stations are located within 100 km of limestone deposits, and 200 are adjacent to the coast.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.2 Accelerated Weathering of Limestone
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Langer et al., [2009]
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Refining this approach to include projected efficiency improvements and the most up to date emission pathways, Davis et al., [2013] used 19 (9 to stabilize emissions and 10 to reduce to zero), although the wedge size remains the same.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.5 Upscaling production
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Davis et al., [2013]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The value of this approach is that it avoids the CO2 burden of decomposing a carbonate raw material, and MgCO3 decarbonates at a lower temperature than CaCO3.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5. Production processes
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The RF has increased by around 15 % on pre-industrial levels and will increase by 30-50 % for a doubling of CO2 [Hauck and Völker 2015].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.1 Global consequences of alkalinity addition
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hauck and Völker 2015
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Almost 50 % of historic anthropogenic CO2 emissions have been absorbed into the ocean [Sabine et al., 2004].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.1 Global consequences of alkalinity addition
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sabine et al., 2004
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The first order impact of increasing [CO3 2-] and [HCO3 -] in seawater is probably minimal.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.2 Localized elevated pH and reduced aqueous CO2
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Initial experiments [Riebesell et al., 2000] suggested that a reduction in [CO3 2-] and therefore a reduction in the saturation state of carbonate minerals, would lead to a reduction in carbonate formation of calcifying organisms.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.1 Global consequences of alkalinity addition
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Riebesell et al., 2000
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For instance, infrastructure development during the industrial revolution expanded at about 5%, tractor production in the U.S. during the height of agricultural mechanization grew at a rate of 16%, post-war U.K. road infrastructure grew at a rate of 15%, and recent cement production grew at a rate of 12% ([DECC 2015;Hilbert and López 2011;Roth and Divall 2015;Renforth et al., 2011; USGS 2014]),”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.5 Upscaling production
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites DECC 2015
- Not checked yetcites Hilbert and López 2011
- Not checked yetcites Roth and Divall 2015
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For the addition of material to the ocean Harvey [2008] suggests a fleet of 3000 ships would be required to add 4 Gt of CaCO3.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 6.1 Ocean Transport
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Harvey [2008]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In marine aquaria, 'calcium reactors' (that cycle the aquarium water through a bed of crushed limestone), or 'Kalkwasser' (a solution of Ca(OH)2), are widely used to prevent problematic decreases in pH caused by respiration and nitrification.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.2 Localized elevated pH and reduced aqueous CO2
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tullock and Earle-Bridges 2002
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While upscaling transport and infrastructure to cope with additional movement of material could be challenging, upscaling the extraction and processing components would probably be more limiting.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 6.1 Ocean Transport
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It may be possible to extract the Mg or Ca from a silicate mineral (thus minimizing Si and Fe added to the ocean) to create pure oxides or hydroxides, however the technology to do this has yet to be developed.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.1 Global consequences of alkalinity addition
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Capacity of material transport over land is likely to be substantially more (10's of billions of tons).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 6.1 Ocean Transport
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given the abundance of mineral resource, it may be possible to optimize a technology to minimize transport requirements.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 6.1 Ocean Transport
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hypothetically, if 50 Mt a -1 of spare capacity was available (and convertible) in existing industries, then the upscaling period would be 26 years for 1 Gt (based on 12% growth)”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.5 Upscaling production
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The capacity for CO2 uptake is inversely proportional to RF, and is currently between 9 and 15 [Sabine et al., 2004].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.1 Global consequences of alkalinity addition
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sabine et al., 2004
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is conceivable that in some confined environments, or under rapid application rates, the ambient pH may be sufficiently elevated to impact ocean biology.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 6.2 Ocean addition
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For instance, if alkalinity addition were more rapid than the rate of CO2 gas to liquid transfer, there would be an increase in [CO3 2-] and [OH -] and a decrease in [CO2 (aq)].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 6.2 Ocean addition
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Substantial research has been undertaken in the last 20 years, which has unearthed a complex relationship between ocean chemistry and ecosystem impact [Fabry et al., 2008;Rost et al., 2008].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.1 Global consequences of alkalinity addition
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fabry et al., 2008
- Not checked yetcites Rost et al., 2008
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, a mineral carbon sequestration technology may have an energy foot print of GJ per ton of material, it may be possible to move material 10s or 100s of km over land and 1000s km over the ocean before significantly impacting the energy or carbon balance of the technology.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 6.1 Ocean Transport
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As such, alkalinity is typically maintained between 3-6 mEq kg -1 [Tullock and Earle-Bridges 2002].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.2 Localized elevated pH and reduced aqueous CO2
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tullock and Earle-Bridges 2002
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is possible that a particle could sink out of the wake and dissolve in the less turbulent part of the mixed layer, creating areas of elevated alkalinity.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 6.2 Ocean addition
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With appropriate policy/market drivers, an expansion of >20 % may be possible, but 10-15 % may be more realistic, and consistent with historic industrial development.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 5.5 Upscaling production
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Global shipping capacity is around 8 billion tons a -1 (the utilization of which broadly follows fluctuations in international trade [UNCTAD 2012]).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 6.1 Ocean Transport
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites UNCTAD 2012
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The consequences of this alkalinity increase on marine ecosystems is poorly understood, but it may provide a competitive advantage for calcifying organisms [Henderson et al., 2008].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.1 Global consequences of alkalinity addition
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Henderson et al., 2008
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As suggested by modeling results in section 5, the globally distributed effects of an increase in ocean alkalinity would be elevated alkalinity, pH or Ωcalcite.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.1 Global consequences of alkalinity addition
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Renforth et al., [2013] suggest a fleet of 100 ships would be required to add 1 Gt of Ca(OH)2 (the difference between these studies is largely a result of the solubility different of the materials added).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 6.1 Ocean Transport
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Renforth et al., [2013]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, addition of alkalinity may induce transient elevated pH and/or lower [CO2 (aq)] around the point of addition (except AWL, which would likely result in elevated [CO2 (aq)] around the reactor outlet).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.2 Localized elevated pH and reduced aqueous CO2
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There is considerable literature on the potential environmental impact of ocean fertilization, including increased production of other more potent greenhouse gasses (N2O and CH4, [Fuhrman and Capone 1991]), lower dissolved oxygen, and nutrient driven ecosystem structural changes [Lampitt et al., 2008].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.1 Global consequences of alkalinity addition
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fuhrman and Capone 1991
- Not checked yetcites Lampitt et al., 2008
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Increasing the pCO2 in equilibrium with the ocean increases [CO2(aq)] in solution, and decreases [CO3 2-].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.1 Global consequences of alkalinity addition
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The recent accumulation of anthropogenic CO2 in the atmosphere has caused a decrease in surface ocean pH by 0.1 units [Doney et al., 2009].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.1 Global consequences of alkalinity addition
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Doney et al., 2009
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Feng et al., [2016] suggest that it may be possible to influence carbonate chemistry at a regional scale (e.g., South China Sea, the Great Barrier Reef).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.2 Localized elevated pH and reduced aqueous CO2
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Feng et al., [2016]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Locke et al., [2009] suggest Crangon septemspinosa (a common shrimp species) is sensitive to Ca(OH)2 addition, with 100% mortality for ~100 mg l -1 addition after 14 days.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.2 Localized elevated pH and reduced aqueous CO2
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Locke et al., [2009]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Within this context, the issue of marine geoengineering was recently addressed under the London Convention and London Protocol [IMO 2003] (LC/LP), treaties that regulate marine pollution from the dumping of wastes or other matter at sea.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.5 Regulation and ethics of adding alkalinity to the ocean
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites IMO 2003
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence, though the amendment to the London Protocol is not yet in force, there remains a possibility that the addition of alkalinity to the ocean could be regulated at a later date as a placement of matter into the sea for marine geoengineering purposes.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.5 Regulation and ethics of adding alkalinity to the ocean
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The texts of these instruments excludes the 'placement of matter for a purpose other than the mere disposal thereof, provided that such placement is not contrary to the aims of this Protocol' from the definition of dumping and would therefore apparently exclude the addition of alkalinity to the ocean from falling under these regimes.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.5 Regulation and ethics of adding alkalinity to the ocean
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Lime and hydrated lime have been used for almost a century to control invasive species in shellfish aquaculture (see Locke et al., [2009], and references therein).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.4 Alkalinity addition in shell fish production and coral reef protection
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Locke et al., [2009]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (LOSC [UN 1982]) lays down the legal framework for almost all matters relating to the seas and oceans.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.5 Regulation and ethics of adding alkalinity to the ocean
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites UN 1982
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Bivalves appear to have less control on the pH within their blood, and are possibly more sensitive to environmental changes [Byrne and Dietz 1997], although control may be unnecessary for anything other than shell formation [Booth et al., 1984].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.2 Localized elevated pH and reduced aqueous CO2
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Byrne and Dietz 1997
- Not checked yetcites Booth et al., 1984
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For instance, Switzer et al., [2011] report that the addition of Ca(OH)2 was effective at controlling the invasive species of Didemnum vexillum (carpet sea squirt) on commercial oysters.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.4 Alkalinity addition in shell fish production and coral reef protection
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Switzer et al., [2011]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, the provisions of the LOSC are generally applicable, setting out the territorial and economic claims of sovereign states, responsibilities for the protection of the marine environment, marine scientific research, and dispute resolution.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.5 Regulation and ethics of adding alkalinity to the ocean
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the face of it, carbon storage as alkalinity falls within the definition of 'marine geoengineering' as 'a deliberate intervention in the marine environment to manipulate natural processes, including to counteract anthropogenic climate change and/or its impacts, and that has the potential to result in deleterious effects, especially where those effects may be widespread, long-lasting or severe.'”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.5 Regulation and ethics of adding alkalinity to the ocean
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Addition to coastal waters would fall under national (or regional) administration, whereas open ocean addition would require international oversight.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.5 Regulation and ethics of adding alkalinity to the ocean
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“During the European Iron Fertilization Experiment [Smetak et al., 2007], 7 tons of material was rapidly (within 1 day) spread over a 167 km 2 patch (10 -4.4 kg m -2 ), which over the following 14 days increased to 740 km 2 (10 -5 kg m -2 ).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.3 Localized changes in dissolved oxygen
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Smetak et al., 2007
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Fish and mammals have developed renal compensation in order to excrete excess alkalinity [Wood et al., 1999], but prolonged exposure may have a chronic impact.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.2 Localized elevated pH and reduced aqueous CO2
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wood et al., 1999
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, Locke et al. [2009] suggests that targeted lime addition to these environments may be able to minimize the impact of ocean acidification or improve water quality in anaerobic estuaries from excess nutrient load.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.4 Alkalinity addition in shell fish production and coral reef protection
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Locke et al. [2009]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The experiments (ranging from pH 8.5 to 8.8, pCO2 200 to 80 µatm, Ωcalcite = 7 to 13) demonstrated respiratory alkalosis possibly in response to lower levels of aqueous CO2.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.2 Localized elevated pH and reduced aqueous CO2
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cripps et al., [2013]
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Carbon storage as alkalinity, as a novel marine activity, is not explicitly addressed in the Convention.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.5 Regulation and ethics of adding alkalinity to the ocean
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Over the last 35 years ocean alkalinity data were collected as part of 42 cruises at 23,000 stations (see CDIAC's ocean carbon data collection http://cdiac.ornl.gov/oceans/).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.6 Monitoring
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites CDIAC's ocean carbon data collection
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The LOSC also provides for the development of specific and detailed norms under the Convention for new and emerging marine activities.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.5 Regulation and ethics of adding alkalinity to the ocean
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, the addition of alkalinity to the ocean would likely operate under a complicated regulatory framework.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.5 Regulation and ethics of adding alkalinity to the ocean
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The amendments need to be ratified by 2/3rds of the Contracting Parties to come into force, which would provide a legally binding mechanism to regulate ocean fertilization, with the possibility of regulating other marine geoengineering activities in the future.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.5 Regulation and ethics of adding alkalinity to the ocean
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Fertilizing biological activity through the addition of iron and silicon (or increased export through ballasting) may increase dissolved oxygen in the photic zone, but reduce it in the waters below due to remineralization of exported organic carbon [Fuhrman and Capone 1991].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.3 Localized changes in dissolved oxygen
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fuhrman and Capone 1991
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Dissolved oxygen in the ocean is controlled by a number of mechanisms including the biogenic production at the surface, respirative removal from remineralization of sinking organic matter, ocean-atmosphere gas exchange, and circulation [Joos et al., 2003].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.3 Localized changes in dissolved oxygen
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Joos et al., 2003
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is therefore possible that oxygen consumption from iron oxidation can be easily mitigated with suitable addition rates, and exploiting rapid dilution in the mixed layer.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.3 Localized changes in dissolved oxygen
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ecosystems could also be exposed to the risk of rapid changes in chemistry should the addition be halted.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.2 Localized elevated pH and reduced aqueous CO2
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Henderson et al., [2008] suggest that changes within the structure of these primary producers, could have important implications for the function of whole marine ecosystems.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.2 Localized elevated pH and reduced aqueous CO2
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Henderson et al., [2008]
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Hypoxia alters benthic ecosystem structure and function, in which smaller taxa are more resilient than larger [Levin et al., 2009].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.3 Localized changes in dissolved oxygen
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Levin et al., 2009
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The collection of data from scientific cruises would likely form an important part of an ocean alkalinity monitoring system.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.6 Monitoring
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The addition rate would have to be sufficient to overcome mixing of the local seawater with the ambient environment, but not sufficient to detrimentally impact ecosystems.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.4 Alkalinity addition in shell fish production and coral reef protection
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The deleterious anthropogenic impact on dissolved oxygen is a concern and could increase the extent of oxygen minimum zones [Stramma et al., 2008].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.3 Localized changes in dissolved oxygen
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Stramma et al., 2008
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, transient reductions in aqueous CO2 caused by alkalinity addition could inhibit photosynthesis, and thus alter the function and structure of phytoplankton communities.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.2 Localized elevated pH and reduced aqueous CO2
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“scope of the London Convention and Protocol includes ocean fertilization activities' due to significant risk that such placement would be contrary to the aims of both the London Convention and the London Protocol.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.5 Regulation and ethics of adding alkalinity to the ocean
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In a single species experiment, Cripps et al., [2013] investigated the impact of Ca(OH)2 addition on Carcinus maenas (a globally distributed crab species).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.2 Localized elevated pH and reduced aqueous CO2
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cripps et al., [2013]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The source of alkalinity may be derived from carbonate or silicate minerals.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, up-scaling these processes to have an impact on anthropogenic CO2 emissions (i.e.billions of tons CO2 a -1 ) is a considerable challenge (as it is for mineral carbonation).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, raised alkalinity in the ocean may change the rate of carbonate mineral production (both biogenic and abiological), but more experimental work is required to constrain this change.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A range of techniques have been proposed for increasing ocean alkalinity, which exploit numerous reaction pathways (Table 1).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Table 1
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While some components of these processes already operate at a large scale (e.g., the production of lime), generally the overall technologies have not developed beyond desk-top technoeconomic assessment or bench scale laboratory work.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As the particulate organic to inorganic carbon ratio is >1, the effect may result in the additional drawdown of atmospheric CO2.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The particulate organic to inorganic carbon ratio is greater than 1.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Direct addition of the latter to the ocean may fertilize biological activity through the co-dissolution of nutrients (e.g., iron and silicon), although it may be possible to extract the magnesium or calcium prior to addition.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, rapid uncontrolled changes in pH, carbonate saturation state, and dissolved aqueous CO2 may have detrimental effects on ocean ecosystems.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Extensive research has been conducted over the last 20 years to understand the impact of ocean acidification on marine biota and the global carbon cycle[Doney et al., 2009].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Doney et al., 2009
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“However, automated monitoring systems are becoming increasingly common, which currently omit alkalinity or carbonate system measurements, but will likely include these in the near future [GOOS 2006].”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 7.6 Monitoring
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites GOOS 2006
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, the modification of the ocean (a global commons) raises issues surrounding regulation, monitoring, and the distribution of impact.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It may also be possible to use faster dissolving carbonate minerals for alkalinity addition (CO2: rock mass ratio ~0.5).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Research investigating the change of shell mass with carbonate ion concentration suggest a growth rate change between 10 -80% for calcite saturation state of 7, which is considerably less than the expected abiological increase of 140 %.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The expected abiological increase in calcite saturation state of 7 is 140%.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On one hand, it may be possible to ameliorate the effects of ocean acidification (i.e.maintaining the saturation state of calcite at an appropriate value) by controlled addition to sensitive environments.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is possible that increased carbonate production and ballasting will also increase the export of organic carbon.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Elevated CO2 in the atmosphere lowers [CO3 2-] in the ocean, which puts stress on shell forming organisms ('ocean acidification').”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Considering these changes as an upper end member, it is unlikely that the average saturation state of calcite will surpass its pre-industrial level, although some environments may be more sensitive than others.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the addition of alkalinity is common in several marine environments (e.g., in aquaria and shellfish production), more research is needed to constrain the wider ecosystem response.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The London Convention/Protocol was created to limit dumping of materials in the ocean, and has been amended (yet to be ratified) to include marine geoengineering proposals.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As such, the residence time for alkalinity in the ocean is on the order of 100 -1,000 ka, and would form, for all practical purposes, a permanent sink for anthropogenic CO2.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Transient localized impact around the point of alkalinity addition could be substantial.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It may be possible to achieve CO2:rock mass ratios >1 using ultrabasic minerals (larger than the ~0.6 mass ratio for solid carbonate formation).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The CO2:rock mass ratio for solid carbonate formation is approximately 0.6.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most of this research omits the investigation of elevated saturation states (e.g., Figure10, which is not exhaustive, but indicative), and primarily focuses on manipulating [CO2 (aq)] rather than alkalinity.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the global carbon cycle, up to 2 Gt C a -1 is incorporated into carbonate shells in the ocean, of which only <0.3 Gt C a -1 makes it into the lithosphere.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An increased carbonate production or decrease in remineralization will lower, or reverse, the effectiveness of ocean alkalinity carbon storage.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Carbonate mineral precipitation is strongly inhibited in seawater, and is almost exclusively produced from biological activity.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Increased alkalinity will also likely reduce the rate at which carbonate is re-mineralized in sediments, and increase the depth of the ocean in which carbonate minerals are thermodynamically unstable ('lysocline'), and thus increase carbonate burial.”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If it were used as the sole destination of all anthropogenic CO2 emissions over the next 100 -500 a, then ocean alkalinity would increase from current levels of 2.3 mEq kg -1 to ~3 mEq kg -1 (resulting in a calcite saturation level of between 5 and 7.5).”
§ Assessing ocean alkalinity for carbon sequestration > 8 Conclusions and further work
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Current ocean alkalinity is 2.3 mEq kg-1.
The authors state this as an assumption.
The growth time for Orbulina universa remains relatively constant, so shell mass is directly analogous to calcification rate.
“Assuming the growth time for the organism remains relatively constant, the shell mass is directly analogous to calcification rate.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The proportional change in shell mass is representative of the proportional change in growth rate.
“However, assuming the proportional change is representative of the proportional change in growth rate, the range of values are substantially less than what would be expected from exclusively abiotic controlled kinetics (~138 % rate change over the same increase in Ωcalcite, see below).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The composition of particulate inorganic carbon is aragonite or Mg-calcite with molecular mass between 97 and 100 g(carbonate) mol-1 and up to 20% MgCO3.
“Assuming the composition of the PIC is aragonite or Mg-calcite (molecular mass between 97 and 100 g(carbonate) mol -1 , and assuming up to 20% MgCO3), the concentration of carbonate minerals in the open surface ocean may be between 5.6 and 23.4 μg l -1 .”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The lower end member of the abiotic precipitation rate range is used for the projected increase in carbonate production.
“While biological carbonate precipitation depends on numerous factors, the abiotic precipitation follows a predicable relationship with Ω, and (assuming the lower end member) would increase from 0.01 to 0.4 Gt C y -1 for an increase in Ωcalcite from its current value to 10 (a 20% increase of carbonate production).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The rate of olivine dissolution is instant and complete in the modeling.
“A complication in this relates to the rate of olivine dissolution required, which are assumed to be instant and complete in the modeling.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The use of produced Mg(OH)2 to increase ocean alkalinity has not been explored.
“The use of the produced Mg(OH)2 to increase ocean alkalinity has not been explored.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
There are no efficiency losses in electrolysis, fuel cell generation, and acid neutralization.
“Assuming no efficiency losses”
The paper relies on this without support.
The limited technoeconomic assessment of these processes largely focuses on deriving overall energy and carbon balances, and there has been little optimization.
“The limited technoeconomic assessment of these processes largely focus on deriving overall energy and carbon balances, and there has been little optimization.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Some reaction kinetics are poorly constrained (particularly for artificial materials), resulting in considerable uncertainty in the design of the flow sheet.
“Furthermore, some of the reaction kinetics are poorly constrained (particularly for artificial materials), resulting in considerable uncertainty in the design of the flow sheet.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Alkalinity addition effects are modeled assuming instantaneous dissolution within the rapidly mixed wake of a ship.
“This assumes instantaneous dissolution within the rapidly mixed wake of a ship.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The dilution formula assumes that the density difference between the disposed chemical and seawater is minimal.
“equation 32 assumes that the density difference between the disposed chemical and seawater is minimal, and thus has greater relevance to the disposal of liquid.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Storage of large volumes of CO2 may be necessary to prevent dangerous climate change.
“Storage of large volumes of CO2 may be necessary to prevent dangerous climate change.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The ocean currently stores around 38,000 Gt C, equivalent to about 140,000 Gt CO2, in the form of ocean alkalinity.
“The ocean currently stores around 38,000 Gt C (equivalent to ~140,000 Gt CO2) in this way”
The paper relies on this without support.
Current ocean alkalinity is 2.3 mEq kg-1.
“current levels of 2.3 mEq kg -1”
The paper relies on this without support.
The particulate organic to inorganic carbon ratio is greater than 1.
“As the particulate organic to inorganic carbon ratio is >1”
The paper relies on this without support.
The CO2:rock mass ratio for solid carbonate formation is approximately 0.6.
“larger than the ~0.6 mass ratio for solid carbonate formation”
The paper relies on this without support.
The expected abiological increase in calcite saturation state of 7 is 140%.
“expected abiological increase of 140 %”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“OAE induces dynamic shifts in the carbonate chemistry in seawater that may impact marine organism physiology, community composition, and trophic interactions during and/or after equilibration with the atmosphere (Oschlies et al., 2023; Renforth and Henderson, 2017).”
From Biogeochemical responses to ocean alkalinity enhancement in the North China Sea (2026) · cites this paper as Renforth and Henderson, 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement (OAE) has been proposed as a promising marine carbon dioxide removal strategy.”
From Biogeochemical responses to ocean alkalinity enhancement in the North China Sea (2026) · cites this paper as Renforth and Henderson, 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“OAE operates by increasing seawater total alkalinity (TA), thereby increasing the ocean's capacity to absorb atmospheric CO 2 and promoting the conversion of dissolved CO 2 into bicarbonate (HCO 3 -) and carbonate (CO 3 2) ions (Bach et al., 2019; Renforth and Henderson, 2017).”
From Biogeochemical responses to ocean alkalinity enhancement in the North China Sea (2026) · cites this paper as Renforth and Henderson, 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Because seawater is typically oversaturated with respect to CaCO3, precipitated CaCO3 may constitute a long-term loss of alkalinity from the water column. 41,42”
From A framework for understanding efficiency losses of Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement (2026) · cites this paper as [42]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“These losses of CO 2 are due to re-equilibration of DIC upon discharge to the ocean.”
From Quantified Carbon Dioxide Removal from an Alkalinity Addition Field Trial in the Kvina River, Norway (2026) · cites this paper as Renforth and Henderson (2017)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
In the citing paper
“The ocean currently stores approximately 140,000 GtCO 2 , and with some changes in its chemistry, it may be able to store in the order of trillions of tons of CO 2 (Renforth and Henderson 2017).”
From Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review (2020) · cites this paper as Renforth and Henderson 2017
In the citing paper
“In terms of permanence, carbon can be stored for extended periods, in the order of 10 4 years, in the form of dissolved inorganic carbon.”
From Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review (2020) · cites this paper as Renforth and Henderson 2017
In the citing paper
“As alkalinity increases, more carbonic acid is converted to bicarbonate and carbonate ions and greater amounts of carbon are stored in inorganic form (Renforth and Henderson 2017).”
From Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review (2020) · cites this paper as Renforth and Henderson 2017
In the citing paper
“According to Renforth et al., the cost of removing CO 2 through ocean alkalinity enhancement is estimated between $10 and $190/tCO 2 , depending on the approach utilized in producing, transporting and distributing the alkaline material (Renforth and Henderson 2017).”
From Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review (2020) · cites this paper as Renforth and Henderson 2017
In the citing paper
“Increasing ocean alkalinity is argued to decrease the surface ocean partial pressure, promoting further oceanic CO 2 uptake, with a major positive side effect of reducing ocean acidification.”
From Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review (2020) · cites this paper as Renforth and Henderson 2017
In the citing paper
“Depending on soil type, atmospheric CO2-derived dissolved inorganic carbon may also be sequestered through the formation of soil carbonate minerals, which reduces the efficiency of carbon sequestration by ~50% 19 .”
From Potential for large-scale CO2 removal via enhanced rock weathering with croplands (2020) · cites this paper as [19]
In the citing paper
“These weathering products are transported via land surface runoff to the oceans with a storage lifetime exceeding 100,000 years 19 .”
From Potential for large-scale CO2 removal via enhanced rock weathering with croplands (2020) · cites this paper as [19]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Calcium increase is not less than 0.3%
MinorThe paper elsewhere gives the current calcium concentration as 10 mmoles kg -1. An increase of 0.9 mmoles kg -1 is 9% of that concentration, not less than 0.3%.
Reported 0.3 · recomputed 9
“only a 0.9 mmoles kg -1 increase in Ca 2+ is required. Even if considering the surface ocean alone this annual addition is less than a 0.3% increase in total Ca 2+ .”
Reported alkalinity-measurement precision is off by a factor of ten
MinorRelative to the paper's stated seawater alkalinity of 2.5 mEq kg -1, a precision of 0.005 mEq kg -1 is 0.2%, not 0.02%.
Reported 0.02 · recomputed 0.2
“It is possible to achieve precision of less than 0.005 mEq kg -1 (0.02%) in routine measurements of seawater alkalinity”
Existing cooling-water flow covers about 2%, not 6%, of CO2 output
MinorThe stated 20 m 3 s -1 of existing cooling-water flow is about 2.2% of the stated 900 m 3 s -1 required to treat all the plant's CO2, rather than 6%.
Reported 6 · recomputed 2.222222
“a once-through seawater cooled, 500 MW plant pumps some 20 m 3 s -1 of seawater, meaning that around 6% of the plant's CO2 could theoretically be converted to seawater alkalinity without new pumping.”
Citations
Cites
Parkhurst, D. L., & Appelo, C. A. J. (1999) · doi:10.3133/wri994259 · Cited by 7,727
Coral Reefs Under Rapid Climate Change and Ocean Acidification
Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Mumby, P. J., Hooten, A. J., Steneck, R. S., Greenfield, P., Gomez, E., Harvell, C. D., Sale, P. F., Edwards, A. J., Caldeira, K., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152509 · Cited by 5,885
IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage
Metz, B., Davidson, O. R., de Coninck, H., Loos, M., & Meyer, L. (2021) · Cited by 4,875
Ocean Acidification: The Other CO 2 Problem
Doney, S. C., Fabry, V. J., Feely, R. A., & Kleypas, J. A. (2009) · Annual Review of Marine Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163834 · Cited by 4,173
The Oceanic Sink for Anthropogenic CO 2
Sabine, C. L., Feely, R. A., Gruber, N., Key, R. M., Lee, K., Bullister, J. L., Wanninkhof, R., Wong, C. S., Wallace, D. W. R., Tilbrook, B., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1097403 · Cited by 4,035
Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C
Rogelj, J., den Elzen, M., Höhne, N., Fransen, T., Fekete, H., Winkler, H., Schaeffer, R., Sha, F., Riahi, K., & Meinshausen, M. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18307 · Cited by 3,637 · cited 1×
“While 136 countries have ratified the agreement, the pledged contributions are insufficient to prevent a 2°C temperature rise [Rogelj et al. 2016].”
BackgroundRobie, R. A., Hemingway, B. S., & Fisher, J. R. (1978) · doi:10.3133/b1452 · Cited by 3,344
Global silicate weathering and CO2 consumption rates deduced from the chemistry of large rivers
Gaillardet, J., Dupré, B., Louvat, P., & Allègre, C. J. (1999) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/s0009-2541(99)00031-5 · Cited by 3,334
Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies
Pacala, S., & Socolow, R. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1100103 · Cited by 3,114
Berner, R. A., Lasaga, A. C., & Garrels, R. M. (1983) · American Journal of Science · doi:10.2475/ajs.283.7.641 · Cited by 2,428 · cited 2×
“Nevertheless, such changes in the weathering/volcanism balance are fundamental in controlling the climate system, and the temperature dependence of weathering rate provides a long-term negative feedback on climate change to keep Earth’s long-term climate in a relatively narrow range [Berner et al., 1983].”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 220 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Booth C. E., 1984, Acid‐base balance in the sea mussel Mytihrs edulis. 1. Effects of hypoxia and air exposure on the hemolymph acid‐base status, Mar. Biol. Lett., 5, 347
- CEFIC, 2011, Guidelines for Measuring and Managing CO2 Emission From Freight Transport Operations, 1
- Ciais P., 2014, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 465
- DECC, 2015, Digest of UK Energy Statistics’, 1
- Drever J. I., 1988, The Geochemistry of Natural Waters
- Edenhofer O., 2014, Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change, Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
- 10.2307/30060218 · DOI
- 10.2307/30066391 · DOI
- Roth R., 2015, From Rail to Road and Back Again?: A Century of Transport Competition and Interdependency, Modern Economic and Social History
- USGS, 2014, USGS Minerals Yearbook ‐ Cement, 16.1
- White A. F., 1995, Chemical weathering rates of silicate minerals, Reviews in mineralogy, Mineral. Soc. Am., 31, 1
- Zeebe R. E., 2001, CO2 in Seawater: Equilibrium, Kinetics, Isotopes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 658
Jeltsch‐Thömmes, A., Tran, G., Lienert, S., Keller, D. P., Oschlies, A., & Joos, F. (2024) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ad4401 · Cited by 21
He, H., Liu, Z., Chen, J., Li, D., Wang, Y., Han, Y., Liu, X., Sun, H., Chen, Q., & Cao, W. (2025) · Global and Planetary Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2025.104694 · Cited by 16
Growth response of Emiliania huxleyi to ocean alkalinity enhancement
Faucher, G., Haunost, M., Paul, A. J., Tietz, A. U. C., & Riebesell, U. (2025) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-22-405-2025 · Cited by 15
Varliero, S., Buono, A., Caserini, S., Raos, G., & Macchi, P. (2024) · ACS Engineering Au · doi:10.1021/acsengineeringau.4c00008 · Cited by 14
Anderson, H. J., Mongin, M., & Matear, R. J. (2025) · Environmental Research Communications · doi:10.1088/2515-7620/adce5a · Cited by 14
Site selection for ocean alkalinity enhancement informed by passive tracer simulations
Guo, Y., Chen, K., Subhas, A. V., Rheuban, J. E., Wang, Z. A., McCorkle, D. C., Michel, A. P. M., & Kim, H. (2025) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-025-02480-1 · Cited by 14
Uncertainties of enhanced rock weathering for climate-change mitigation
Schiedung, M., Harrington, K., Dupla, X., Möller, B., Facq, E., Sweere, T., Don, A., Hilton, R. G., Döetterl, S., & Hemingway, J. (2026) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-026-00761-7 · Cited by 25
Potential ecotoxicological effects of elevated bicarbonate ion concentrations on marine organisms
Gim, B.-M., Hong, S., Lee, J., Kim, N., Kwon, E.-M., Gil, J.-W., Lim, H.-H., Jeon, E.-C., & Khim, J. S. (2018) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.057 · Cited by 14
Sankar, M. S., Dash, P., Lu, Y., Hu, X., Mercer, A. E., Wickramarathna, S., Beshah, W. T., Sanders, S. L., Arslan, Z., Dyer, J. L., et al. (2022) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-022-10719-z · Cited by 16
Optimization and decision support models for deploying negative emissions technologies
Migo-Sumagang, M. V., Aviso, K. B., Foo, D. C. Y., Short, M., Nair, P. N. S. B., & Tan, R. R. (2023) · PLOS Sustainability and Transformation · doi:10.1371/journal.pstr.0000059 · Cited by 14
Experimentally-calibrated estimation of CO2 removal potentials of enhanced weathering
Chen, A., Chen, Z., Qiu, Z., & Lin, B. (2023) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165766 · Cited by 15
Chen, S. A., Weber, J., Starchenko, V., Eng, P. J., Stubbs, J. E., Wang, H.-W., Liu, T., Spano, T. L., Chakoumakos, B. C., & Stack, A. G. (2024) · Crystal Growth & Design · doi:10.1021/acs.cgd.4c00245 · Cited by 15
Hemispherical scale mechanisms of nitrate formation in global marine aerosols
Lao, Q., Li, H., Yan, J., Jin, G., He, G., Chen, C., Zhu, Q., & Chen, F. (2024) · npj Climate and Atmospheric Science · doi:10.1038/s41612-024-00694-2 · Cited by 15
Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement in Deep Water Formation Regions Under Low and High Emission Pathways
Nagwekar, T., Nissen, C., & Hauck, J. (2024) · Earth s Future · doi:10.1029/2023ef004213 · Cited by 17
Savoie, A. M., Ringham, M., Sanchez, C. T., Carter, B. R., Dougherty, S., Feely, R. A., Hegeman, D., Herndon, J., Khangaonkar, T. P., Loretz, J. C., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Environmental Engineering · doi:10.3389/fenve.2025.1641277 · Cited by 16
Viability of greenhouse gas removal via artificial addition of volcanic ash to the ocean
Longman, J., Palmer, M. R., & Gernon, T. (2020) · Anthropocene · doi:10.1016/j.ancene.2020.100264 · Cited by 14
Kitch, G. D., Jacobson, A. D., Sageman, B. B., Coccioni, R., Chung-Swanson, T., Ankney, M. E., & Hurtgen, M. T. (2022) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-022-00641-0 · Cited by 14
Yan, Z., Wang, X., Li, H., & Song, D. (2020) · Hydrogeology Journal · doi:10.1007/s10040-020-02144-8 · Cited by 13
Optimum integration of negative emission technologies for carbon-constrained energy sector planning
Prabhakar, S., & Bandyopadhyay, S. K. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137302 · Cited by 14
Flipkens, G., Dujardin, V., Salden, J., T’Jollyn, K., Town, R. M., & Blust, R. (2023) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115840 · Cited by 13
Ismail, R., Saad, M. A. H., Al-Marri, M. J., Ali, S., Mohamed, A. T., El‐Naas, M. H., Soliman, A. M. S., & Benamor, A. (2024) · Journal of environmental chemical engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2024.112325 · Cited by 13
Regional potential of coastal ocean alkalinization with olivine within 100 years
Ramasamy, M., Amann, T., & Moosdorf, N. (2024) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ad4664 · Cited by 17
Sustainable agricultural practices: Volcanic rock potential for soil remineralization
Cardozo, E. S., Pinto, V. M., Nadaleti, W. C., Thue, P. S., dos Santos, M., Gomes, C. G., Ribeiro, A. S., da Silva, A. C., & Vieira, B. M. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142876 · Cited by 13
Large Porewater‐Derived Carbon Outwelling Across Mangrove Seascapes Revealed by Radium Isotopes
Cabral, A., Reithmaier, G., Yau, Y. Y. Y., Cotovicz, L. C., Jr., Barreira, J., Viana, B., Hayden, J., Bouillon, S., Brandini, N., Hatje, V., et al. (2024) · Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans · doi:10.1029/2024jc021319 · Cited by 13
Advancing Enhanced Weathering Modeling in Soils: Critical Comparison With Experimental Data
Bertagni, M. B., Calabrese, S., Cipolla, G., Noto, L., & Porporato, A. M. (2024) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2024ms004224 · Cited by 13
A review of microfluidic technology for CO2 sequestration in saline aquifers
Zhong, Y., Li, Q., Gao, W., Wen, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.01.018 · Cited by 13
Changing trace element cycles in the 21st century ocean.
Henderson, G. M., Achterberg, E. P., & Bopp, L. (2018) · Elements · doi:10.2138/gselements.14.6.409 · Cited by 13
Self-citationShi, L., Zeng, S., Liu, Z., He, H., Shao, M., Zhao, M. J., & Zhao, Y. (2025) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2025.105149 · Cited by 12
Carbon dioxide removal via weathering of sugarcane mill ash under different soil conditions
Green, H., Larsen, P. L., Liu, Y., & Nelson, P. N. (2024) · Applied Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2024.105940 · Cited by 12
Kumari, M., Soni, A. P., Ryu, B., Chun, I., Lee, J., Kim, M., & Hwang, I. (2024) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2024.102912 · Cited by 12
Johnson, M. T., van Doorn, E., Hilmi, N., Marandino, C., McDonald, N., Thomas, H., Allemand, D., Algarin, L. D., Lebleu, L., Ho, D. T., et al. (2024) · Elementa Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.1525/elementa.2023.00071 · Cited by 17
Low-carbon, hydrogen-rich syngas from sorption-enhanced gasification: A review
Dziva, G., Weitzel, J., Cui, P., Yew, M., Ding, G., Zeng, L., & Li, S. (2025) · Carbon Capture Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ccst.2025.100372 · Cited by 13
Ocean-Based Carbon Dioxide Removal: A New Frontier in the Blue Economy
Gagern, A., Manley, J., & Kapsenberg, L. (2022) · Marine Technology Society Journal · doi:10.4031/mtsj.56.1.15 · Cited by 12
Modeling the Effect of Microbially Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation (MICP) on CO2 Trapping
Chen, R., Kavala, M., Saracho, A. C., & Marek, E. (2025) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5c08890 · Cited by 11
Harnessing enhanced rock weathering for carbon neutrality: potential and challenges in China
Cong, L., Lu, S., Jiang, P., Zheng, T., Zhang, Y., Lü, X., Yu, Z., & Xu, T. (2025) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2025.105309 · Cited by 13
Shaw, C., Ringham, M., Carter, B. R., Tyka, M. D., & Eisaman, M. D. (2025) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2025.1616362 · Cited by 11
Alkalinity enhancement with sodium hydroxide in coastal ocean waters
Wynn-Edwards, C. A., Dillon, W., Akl, J., Neill, C. C., Anderson, H. J., Lim, H. S., Mongin, M., & Shadwick, E. H. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-31606-w · Cited by 11
Ziyang, S. O. N. G., Zhou, K.-Y., Dai, Z., Gu, Y., Li, Y., Pan, Y., Cao, Z., Yang, L., & Yin, Z. (2026) · Gas Science and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jgsce.2026.205922 · Cited by 11
Direct evidence of CO2 drawdown through enhanced weathering in soils
Linke, T., Oelkers, É. H., Möckel, S. C., & Gislason, S. R. (2024) · Geochemical Perspectives Letters · doi:10.7185/geochemlet.2415 · Cited by 11
Dickinson-Cove, A., Plante, E. C. L., Liu, Y., Simonetti, D., Hoek, E. M. V., Sant, G., & Jassby, D. (2024) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d4cs00701h · Cited by 13
Root exudates in mangrove forests accelerate bicarbonate production in the soil environment
Kato, N., Osaka, K., Ohtsuka, T., & Iimura, Y. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-82873-y · Cited by 11
Potential of CO 2 sequestration through accelerated weathering of limestone on ships
Dong, S., Berelson, W. M., Forin, P., Gutierrez, M., Carroll, D., Menemenlis, D., Kyi, A. Y., & Adkins, J. F. (2025) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adr7250 · Cited by 11
Subhas, A. V., Rheuban, J. E., Wang, Z. A., McCorkle, D. C., Michel, A. P. M., Marx, L., Dean, C. L., Morkeski, K., Hayden, M. G., Burkitt-Gray, M., et al. (2025) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-22-5511-2025 · Cited by 11
Catalogue of South African mine tailings for geochemical carbon dioxide removal purposes
Bullock, L. A., Nkosi, Z. H., Vele, M., & Amponsah-Dacosta, M. (2023) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.103844 · Cited by 11
Mineral formation during shipboard ocean alkalinity enhancement experiments in the North Atlantic
Hashim, M. S., Marx, L., Klein, F., Dean, C. L., Burdige, E., Hayden, M., McCorkle, D. C., & Subhas, A. V. (2025) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-22-7149-2025 · Cited by 13
Dupla, X., Bertagni, M. B., & Grand, S. (2025) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5c09820 · Cited by 10
Sedimentation in particle-laden flows with and without velocity shear
Yang, A. J. K., Olsthoorn, J., & Timmermans, M. (2023) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0159676 · Cited by 10
Cong, H., Yan, X.-Q., Yang, L., Jiang, Y. Y., Wang, C., Zhan, D., Li, Y., & Dai, M. (2024) · Environmental Science & Technology Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00313 · Cited by 10
Moras, C. A., Joannes‐Boyau, R., Bach, L. T., Cyronak, T. J., & Schulz, K. G. (2024) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2024.1396487 · Cited by 12
Delacroix, S., Nystuen, T. J., Tobiesen, A., King, A. L., & Höglund, E. (2024) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-21-3677-2024 · Cited by 10
Kayode-Edwards, J. O., Kayode-Edwards, I. I., & Kayode-Edwards, D. O. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73584-4_4 · Cited by 10
Particle fluxes by subtropical pelagic communities under ocean alkalinity enhancement
Suessle, P., Taucher, J., Goldenberg, S. U., Baumann, M., Spilling, K., Noche-Ferreira, A., Vanharanta, M., & Riebesell, U. (2025) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-22-71-2025 · Cited by 10
Chou, W., Fan, L., Natividad, M., Chen, J., Tang, Z., Chen, H., Chen, P., Kong, E., Shih, Y., Huang, W., et al. (2025) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2024gl112373 · Cited by 10
Yao, W., Morganti, T., Wu, J., Borchers, M., Anschutz, A. J., Bednarz, L.-K., Bhaumik, A., Boettcher, M., Burkhard, K., Cabus, T., et al. (2025) · Earth s Future · doi:10.1029/2024ef004902 · Cited by 11
Kirchner, J. S., Lettmann, K., Schnetger, B., Wolff, J., & Brumsack, H. (2021) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min11111261 · Cited by 10
Lebling, K., Northrop, E., McCormick, C., & Bridgwater, E. (2022) · doi:10.46830/wrirpt.21.00090 · Cited by 12
A survey of interventions to actively conserve the frozen North
van Wijngaarden, A., Moore, J. C., Alfthan, B., Kurvits, T., & Kullerud, L. (2024) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-024-03705-6 · Cited by 10
Carbonate Chemistry, Carbon Cycle, and Its Sequestration in Aquatic System
Vashist, M., Chawla, H., & Singh, S. (2022) · doi:10.1002/9781119870562.ch10 · Cited by 10
Metal bioaccumulation and effects of olivine sand exposure on benthic marine invertebrates
Jankowska, E., Montserrat, F., Romaniello, S. J., Walworth, N. G., & Andrews, M. G. (2024) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142195 · Cited by 9
Hu, Y., Chen, L., Ren, H., & Liu, J. (2024) · Marine Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2024.106708 · Cited by 9
Negative Emission Enabled by Combining Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement and Waste Concrete Upcycling
Jin, S., Tyka, M. D., Martinez, C. R., Davis, C. E., Arsdale, C. V., & Papania-Davis, A. R. (2025) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c07507 · Cited by 9
Evaluating ocean alkalinity enhancement as a carbon dioxide removal strategy in the North Sea
Liu, F., Daewel, U., Kossack, J., Demir, K. T., Thomas, H., & Schrum, C. (2025) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-22-3699-2025 · Cited by 9
Antoni, D., Wichels, A., Boersma, M., & Gerdts, G. (2025) · Frontiers in Microbiomes · doi:10.3389/frmbi.2025.1606890 · Cited by 9
In-situ mineral carbonation of ultramafic tailings for carbon dioxide removal: A critical review
Lu, X., Xu, L., Li, X., Hou, Y., Chen, Q., & Li, Q. (2025) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2025.108046 · Cited by 11
Bijma, J., Hagens, M., Hammes, J. S., Planavsky, N. J., von Strandmann, P. A. E. P., Reershemius, T., Reinhard, C. T., Renforth, P., Suhrhoff, T. J., Vicca, S., et al. (2026) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-23-53-2026 · Cited by 22
Self-citationA Parameterized Lifecycle Assessment of Ex Situ CO 2 Mineralization, Using Olivine as a Case Study
Lunstrum, A. M., Wyckoff, A., Wallace, A., Pelton, R. E. O., & O’Rourke, A. (2026) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5c02627 · Cited by 9
Weathering without realizing inorganic CO 2 removal revealed through base cation monitoring
Vienne, A., Frings, P. J., Rijnders, J., Suhrhoff, T. J., Reershemius, T., Poetra, R. P., Hartmann, J., Niron, H., Estrada, M. P., Steinwidder, L., et al. (2026) · SOIL · doi:10.5194/soil-12-421-2026 · Cited by 20
Microbially mediated carbon dioxide removal for sustainable mining
McCutcheon, J., & Power, I. (2023) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002026 · Cited by 9
Potential CO2 capture via enhanced weathering by basaltic sand spreading on golf courses in the U.S.
Zhou, Q. (2023) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.104032 · Cited by 9
Carbon Dioxide Capture and Sequestration to Achieve Paris Climate Targets
Bajaj, P., & Thakur, S. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86290-9_13 · Cited by 9
The race to remove CO2 needs more contestants
Rau, G. H. (2019) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0445-5 · Cited by 9
Zhou, M., Tyka, M. D., Ho, D. T., Yankovsky, E., Bachman, S., Nicholas, T., Karspeck, A. R., & Long, M. C. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4124909/v1 · Cited by 9
The inorganic carbon system across the land-to-ocean continuum
Wang, Z. A., & Cai, W. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-99762-1.00032-2 · Cited by 8
Taqieddin, A., Sarrouf, S., Ehsan, M. F., Buesseler, K. O., & Alshawabkeh, A. N. (2024) · npj Ocean Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s44183-024-00064-8 · Cited by 10
Marín-Samper, L., Arı́stegui, J., Hernández‐Hernández, N., & Riebesell, U. (2024) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-21-5707-2024 · Cited by 10
Biçe, K., Stewart, T. M., Waldbusser, G. G., & Meile, C. D. (2025) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-22-641-2025 · Cited by 9
Gonneea, M. E., Kroeger, K. D., Pohlman, J., Tamborski, J. J., Wang, Z. A., Brooks, T. W., Suttles, J. A. O., & Mann, A. G. (2025) · Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences · doi:10.1029/2025jg008898 · Cited by 8
Ocean liming effect on a North Atlantic microbial community: changes in composition and rates
de Castro, I., Ribeiro, S. C., Louvado, A., Gomes, N. C. M., Cachão, M., de Azevedo, E. B., & Ramos, J. B. E. (2025) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2025.1602158 · Cited by 8
Tu, T., Zhang, X., Wu, Y., Mao, Z., Zhang, J., Ji, J., Xing, L., Kang, J., Chen, S., Liu, P., et al. (2025) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d5ee05170c · Cited by 8
The Global Carbon and Oxygen Cycles
Schlesinger, W. H., & Bernhardt, E. S. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-814608-8.00011-6 · Cited by 10
Toward low-cost automated monitoring of life below water with deep learning
Ayyagari, D., Morris, C. J., Barnes, J. G., & Whidden, C. (2023) · Environmental Data Science · doi:10.1017/eds.2023.8 · Cited by 8
India’s biogeochemical capacity to attain food security and remediate climate
Mir, I. A., Goreau, T. J. F., Campe, J., & Jerden, J. L. (2023) · Environmental Geochemistry and Health · doi:10.1007/s10653-023-01827-x · Cited by 8
González-Santana, D., Segovia, M., González‐Dávila, M., Ramírez, L., González, A. G., Pozzo-Pirotta, L. J., Arnone, V., Vázquez, V., Riebesell, U., & Santana‐Casiano, J. M. (2024) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-21-2705-2024 · Cited by 8
Jones, K., Hemery, L. G., Ward, N. D., Regier, P., Ringham, M., & Eisaman, M. D. (2025) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-22-1615-2025 · Cited by 8
Geochemical Drivers of Enhanced Rock Weathering in Soils
Dupla, X., Brantley, S. L., Paulo, C., Möller, B., Power, I., & Grand, S. (2025) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394204847.ch13 · Cited by 10
Bobell, B., Boyn, J.-N., Martirez, J. M. P., & Carter, E. A. (2024) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268976.2024.2375370 · Cited by 7
Current rates of CO2 removal due to rock weathering in the UK
Harrington, K., Henderson, G. M., & Hilton, R. G. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177458 · Cited by 7
Self-citationYang, A. J. K., Timmermans, M.-L., Olsthoorn, J., & Kaminski, A. K. (2025) · Physical Review Fluids · doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.10.014501 · Cited by 7
Bortuzzo, V., Bertagna, S., Braidotti, L., & Bucci, V. (2025) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2025.1434342 · Cited by 7
Alkalinity factory can achieve positive climate benefits within decades
Yan, Q., Zheng, L., Zhuang, W., & Liu, J. (2025) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145406 · Cited by 7
A critical analysis of marine carbon sequestration opportunities in South Korea
Macreadie, P. I., Ross, F. W. R., Duarte, C. M., Hong, J. W., & Yoon, H. (2025) · PLOS Climate · doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000591 · Cited by 7
Gu, J., Chen, K., Cai, T., Liang, Y., Na, P., Zhou, H., Peng, J., Huang, W., Dang, Z., & Chen, Y. (2025) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126599 · Cited by 8
zu Drewer, J. M., Vorrath, M.-E., Amann, T., Hartmann, J., Arranz, J. M. D. L. R., Möllmer, J., Pérez-Dalí, S. M., Meredith, W., Uguna, C. N., Snape, C. E., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2025.1631368 · Cited by 8
Traboni, C., Nocera, A. C., Romano, F., Courboulès, J., Chantzaras, C., Magiopoulos, I., Varliero, S., Basso, D., & Pitta, P. (2025) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.1002/lno.70136 · Cited by 10
The Physiological Response of Contrasting Coccolithophore Species to Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement
Gill, S., Ge, J.-T., Zhang, Q., Henderson, G. M., & Rickaby, R. E. M. (2025) · Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences · doi:10.1029/2025jg009103 · Cited by 7
Self-citationLaurent, A., Wang, B., Atamanchuk, D., Rakshit, S., Azetsu‐Scott, K., Algar, C. K., & Fennel, K. (2026) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-23-115-2026 · Cited by 6
Impulse response functions as a framework for quantifying ocean-based carbon dioxide removal
Yankovsky, E., Zhou, M., Tyka, M. D., Bachman, S., Ho, D. T., Karspeck, A. R., & Long, M. C. (2025) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-22-5723-2025 · Cited by 9
Long-term variability of satellite derived total alkalinity in the southwest Bay of Bengal
Priyanka, K., Shanthi, R., Poornima, D., Saravanakumar, A., Roy, R., & Nagamani, P. V. (2022) · Quaternary Science Advances · doi:10.1016/j.qsa.2022.100066 · Cited by 7
Marine methods for carbon dioxide removal: fundamentals and myth-busting for the wider community
Rohling, E. J. (2023) · Oxford Open Climate Change · doi:10.1093/oxfclm/kgad004 · Cited by 7
The economics of geoengineering
Harding, A. R., & Moreno‐Cruz, J. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-814104-5.00025-9 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Renforth, P., & Henderson, G.
- Affiliations
- Cardiff University (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Renforth, Phil
- Venue
- Reviews of Geophysics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2017-07-27
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 636-674
- ISSN
- 0096-1043 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-1209
- 1944-9208
- OpenAlex
- W2625135129
- Cited by
- 655
- References
- 220
- Citations by year
- 2026: 123 · 2025: 117 · 2024: 122 · 2023: 127 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 7.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Reviews of Geophysics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Carnegie Institution of Washington
- University of Oxford
- Cardiff University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
- Keywords
- ocean alkalinity, ocean carbon sequestration, CO2 sequestration, bicarbonate, carbonate saturation state, ocean acidification, enhanced weathering, accelerated weathering, carbonate precipitation, silicate weathering, limestone weathering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review