Cited by 504Resilience and Mental HealthRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Phenomenology and Ecological Systems Theory: Development of Diverse Groups

Spencer, Margaret Beale·2007·Handbook of Child Psychology

Abstract

The theoretical framework addresses the life course human development of diverse groups. It acknowledges that all humans are vulnerable, and that patterned and unique outcome variations emerge given perception-linked and context-based interactions between culture and ethnicity. The perspective emphasizes not only the “what” or outcomes of development but also the “how.” The theory explores the many paths for obtaining both resiliency (i.e., positive outcomes independent of significant challenge) and unproductive outcomes given structured inequalities. In providing an identity-focused cultural ecological (ICE) perspective as applied to diverse humans, the framework examines the broad patterns of coping processes and identity formation that result. Keywords: coping processes; cultural diversity; ecological contexts; human vulnerability and resiliency; identity formation; social cognition and perception

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0115

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The principles of the science of individuality are consistent with research on the differential effects of interventions, the historical and phenomenological factors that affect individual responses to adversities, and the neurobiological factors involved in individual differences in plasticity and susceptibility to environmental influences.

    “The principles of this science are consistent with a range of fields, including research on the differential effects of interventions (Kellam, Koretz, & Mościcki, 1999), the historical and phenomenological factors that affect individual responses to adversities (Spencer, 2007), and the neurobiological factors involved in individual differences in plasticity and susceptibility to environmental”
  • Children's long-term responses to adversities vary as a function of individual sensitivities and dispositions; socialization practices; the type, timing, and intensity of adversities; and the countervailing buffering supports available to them.

    “Children's long-term responses to adversities vary as a function of individual sensitivities and dispositions; socialization practices; the type, timing, and intensity of adversities; and the countervailing buffering supports available to them (e.g., Spencer, 2007;Spencer et al., 2015).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spencer, M. B.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Spencer, Margaret Beale
Venue
Handbook of Child Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-06
OpenAlex
W1727645093
Cited by
504
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 19
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
cultural diversity, human development, life course development, resilience, vulnerability, coping, identity construction, social cognition, perception, ethnicity, cultural context, social inequality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review