Cited by 102Educational Outcomes and InfluencesHigher Education Research StudiesYouth Development and Social Support

Factors that promote high school graduation: a review of the literature

Zaff, Jonathan F., Donlan, Alice, Gunning, Aaron, Anderson, Sara E., McDermott, Elana, Sedaca, Michelle·2017·Educational Psychology Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10648-016-9363-5

Cites

136 of 136 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Zaff, J. F., Donlan, A., Gunning, A., Anderson, S. E., McDermott, E., & Sedaca, M.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
Corresponding author
Zaff, Jonathan F.
Venue
Educational Psychology Review
Published
2016-03-18
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
447-476
ISSN
  • 1040-726X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-336X
OpenAlex
W2300260008
Cited by
102
References
136
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
20.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
Keywords
high school graduation, graduation rates, student assets, school dropout, family environment, school context, peer context, community context, longitudinal study, education policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review