The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science
Abstract
This chapter contains section titled: Convergence upon Empiricism in Feminist Accounts of the Justification of Scientific Knowledge Convergence upon Empiricism in Treatments of Contextual Values Bibliography
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.
Brewer, R. M., & Collins, P. H. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074808 · Cited by 19,445
The science question in feminism
Waters, K. (1987) · Women's Studies International Forum · doi:10.1016/0277-5395(87)90077-x · Cited by 3,804
Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-6234 · Cited by 3,677
Learning from the Outsider Within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought
Collins, P. H. (1986) · Social Problems · doi:10.2307/800672 · Cited by 3,536
Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry
Longino, H. E. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9780691209753 · Cited by 3,092
Longino, H. E. (2002) · doi:10.1515/9780691187013 · Cited by 1,622
Inessential woman: problems of exclusion in feminist thought
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-5715 · Cited by 1,613
The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge.
Lengermann, P. M., Niebrugge-Brantley, J., & Smith, D. E. (1991) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2580263 · Cited by 993
Is science multicultural?: postcolonialisms, feminisms, and epistemologies
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-6183 · Cited by 854
Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited
Hekman, S. (1997) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/495159 · Cited by 706
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Addelson, 1991, Kathryn Pyne Addelson, Impure Thoughts: Essays on Philosophy, Feminism, and Ethics
- Bakhurst, 1992, A Companion to Epistemology, 191
- Bleier, 1984, Science and Gender
- Galison, 1996, The Disunity of Science, 118
- Gould, 1981, The Mismeasure of Man
- Harding, 1993, Feminist Epistemologies, 49
- Hayles, 1993, Realism and Representation, 27
- Kitcher, 1993, The Advancement of Science
- Lewontin, 1984, Not in Our Genes
- Lloyd, 1995, Objectivity and the Double Standard for Feminist Epistemolo-gies, Synthese, 104, 351, 10.1007/BF01064505 · doi:10.1007/bf01064505
- Nelson, 1993, Feminist Epistemologies, 121
- Potter, 1993, Feminist Epistemologies, 161
- Quine, 1978, The Web of Belief
- Smith, 1987, The Everyday World as Problematic: A Sociology for Women
- Wylie, 2003, Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology, 26
Cited by
van Anders, S. M. (2015) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-015-0490-8 · Cited by 651
Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony
Anderson, E. (2011) · Episteme · doi:10.3366/epi.2011.0013 · Cited by 445
The Case for Rage: Why Anger Is Essential to Anti-Racist Struggle
Cherry, M. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197557341.001.0001 · Cited by 269
Citizen Knowledge: Markets, Experts, and the Infrastructure of Democracy
Herzog, L. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197681718.001.0001 · Cited by 80
Sex/gender differences in cognitive abilities
Kheloui, S., Jacmin-Park, S., Larocque, O., Kerr, P., Rossi, M., Cartier, L., & Juster, R.-P. (2023) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105333 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Potter, E.
- Venue
- The Blackwell Guide to Feminist Philosophy
- Publisher
- Blackwell Publishing Ltd
- Published
- 2008-04-01
- Pages
- 235-253
- OpenAlex
- W1586394730
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 25.74
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/9780470696132.ch13
- The paper
- Potter, E. (2008). Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. The Blackwell Guide to Feminist Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470696132.ch13
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
