Cited by 651LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGender and Feminist StudiesGender, Sexuality, and Education

Beyond sexual orientation: integrating gender/sex and diverse sexualities via sexual configurations theory

van Anders, Sari M.·2015·Archives of Sexual Behavior

Abstract

Sexual orientation typically describes people's sexual attractions or desires based on their sex relative to that of a target. Despite its utility, it has been critiqued in part because it fails to account for non-biological gender-related factors, partnered sexualities unrelated to gender or sex, or potential divergences between love and lust. In this article, I propose Sexual Configurations Theory (SCT) as a testable, empirically grounded framework for understanding diverse partnered sexualities, separate from solitary sexualities. I focus on and provide models of two parameters of partnered sexuality--gender/sex and partner number. SCT also delineates individual gender/sex. I discuss a sexual diversity lens as a way to study the particularities and generalities of diverse sexualities without privileging either. I also discuss how sexual identities, orientations, and statuses that are typically seen as misaligned or aligned are more meaningfully conceptualized as branched or co-incident. I map out some existing identities using SCT and detail its applied implications for health and counseling work. I highlight its importance for sexuality in terms of measurement and social neuroendocrinology, and the ways it may be useful for self-knowledge and feminist and queer empowerment and alliance building. I also make a case that SCT changes existing understandings and conceptualizations of sexuality in constructive and generative ways informed by both biology and culture, and that it is a potential starting point for sexual diversity studies and research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10508-015-0490-8

Cites

229 of 229 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescents are less likely than adults to conform to firm categories of sexual orientation or gender identity.

    “To do this well will require careful attention, as adolescents are less likely than adults to conform to firm categories of sexual orientation or gender identity (Savin-Williams et al., 2012, van Anders, 2015).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Anders, S. M.
Venue
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Published
2015-03-14
Volume
44
Issue
5
Pages
1177-1213
ISSN
  • 0004-0002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2800
OpenAlex
W2032467534
Cited by
651
References
229
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 17
FWCI
60.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
Keywords
sexual orientation, sexual diversity, sex and gender, sexual identity, sexual status, love and lust, feminist empowerment, alliance building
MeSH terms
Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Love, Personality, Power, Psychological, Sexual Behavior, Social Perception, Sexuality, Social Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review