Cited by 218Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsClinical practice guidelines implementationAcademic Writing and Publishing

Overviews of Reviews

Becker, Lorne A, Oxman, Andrew D·2008·Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

Abstract

This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction Preparing a Cochrane Overview of reviews Format of a Cochrane Overview Chapter information References

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9780470712184.ch22

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Becker, L. A., & Oxman, A. D.
Affiliations
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University (US)
  • Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten (NO)
Venue
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-09-22
Pages
607-631
OpenAlex
W1495670988
Cited by
218
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
Keywords
Cochrane Handbook

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review