Cited by 154Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsPhysical Activity and HealthTechnology Use by Older Adults

Promotion of Physical Activity in Older People Using mHealth and eHealth Technologies: Rapid Review of Reviews

Open access
McGarrigle, Lisa, Todd, Chris·2020·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Older people are at increased risk of adverse health events because of reduced physical activity. There is concern that activity levels are further reduced in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, as many older people are practicing physical and social distancing to minimize transmission. Mobile health (mHealth) and eHealth technologies may offer a means by which older people can engage in physical activity while physically distancing. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the evidence for mHealth or eHealth technology in the promotion of physical activity among older people aged 50 years or older. Methods: We conducted a rapid review of reviews using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We searched for systematic reviews published in the English language in 3 electronic databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, and Scopus. Two reviewers used predefined inclusion criteria to select relevant reviews and extracted data on review characteristics and intervention effectiveness. Two independent raters assessed review quality using the AMSTAR-2 tool. Results: Titles and abstracts (n=472) were screened, and 14 full-text reviews were assessed for eligibility. Initially, we included 5 reviews but excluded 1 from the narrative as it was judged to be of critically low quality. Three reviews concluded that mHealth or eHealth interventions were effective in increasing physical activity. One review found that the evidence was inconclusive. Conclusions: There is low to moderate evidence that interventions delivered via mHealth or eHealth approaches may be effective in increasing physical activity in older adults in the short term. Components of successful interventions include self-monitoring, incorporation of theory and behavior change techniques, and social and professional support.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/22201

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Older adults demonstrate lower willingness to engage with digital health interventions due to factors such as health awareness and limited proficiency in using digital health interventions.

    “For instance, older adults demonstrate lower willingness to engage with DHIs due to factors such as health awareness and limited proficiency in using DHIs (37).”

    From The effectiveness of digital health intervention on glycemic control and physical activity in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says older adults are likely to have less experience with technology and may face a steep learning curve when using apps. It also discusses perceived need as a factor in motivation, but does not establish that older adults have lower willingness to engage with digital health interventions or identify health awareness as a cause. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGarrigle, L., & Todd, C.
Affiliations
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Todd, Chris
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2020-12-29
Volume
22
Issue
12
Pages
e22201
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3114894794
Cited by
154
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 10
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR200299)
  • Department of Health and Social Care
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
physical activity promotion, older adults, mobile health, e-health, mobile health intervention, self-monitoring, behaviour change techniques, social support, intervention effectiveness
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Humans, Exercise, Telemedicine, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review