Cited by 74Linguistic and Sociocultural StudiesMultilingual Education and PolicyLanguage and Culture

Code‐Switching, Identity, and Globalization

Open access
Hall, Kira, Nilep, Chad·2015·The Handbook of Discourse Analysis

Abstract

Since the mid-twentieth century, treatments of code switching and associated practices have converged toward understanding linguistic hybridity and diverse sociality amid accelerating globalization of peoples, social groups, and commodified languages. This chapter reviews four traditions of code switching research that suggest divergent theoretical perspectives on language and identity. The first, established in the 1960s within the ethnography of communication, situates code switching as a product of local speech community identities. Research on language and political economy in the 1980s initiated a second tradition, which analyzes language alternation with reference to the contrastive nation-state identities constituted through processes of nationalism. A third tradition, influenced by the discursive turn in the 1990s, views code switching as a resource in urban minority communities for the performance of multicultural and interethnic identities. A fourth tradition, developed since the millennium, focuses on hybrid identities as the social corollary to the language mixing brought about through accelerated globalization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781118584194.ch28

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  2. Bakhtin, Mikail. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  3. Blom, Jan-Petter, and John Gumperz. 1972. Social meaning in linguistic structures: code switching in northern Norway. In John Gumperz and Del Hymes (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, 407-434. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  4. Blommaert, Jan. 2010. The Sociolinguistics ofGlobalization. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble. London: Routledge
  6. Nilep, Chad. 2009. Articulating a Transnational Family: Hippo Family Language Learners in Japan and the USA. Doctoral dissertation. Department of Linguistics, University of Colorado.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hall, K., & Nilep, C.
Venue
The Handbook of Discourse Analysis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-17
Pages
597-619
OpenAlex
W1581129723
Cited by
73
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
Locations
PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Language and Culture
Keywords
code-switching, linguistic hybridity, language and identity, globalization, nationalism, multicultural identity, hybrid identity, code-mixing, ethnography of communication, discursive turn

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review