CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 368Innovation and Knowledge ManagementIntellectual Capital and Performance AnalysisHuman Resource and Talent Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?

Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., Martin, Jeffrey A.·2017·The SMS Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Capabilities
DOI 10.1002/9781405164054.ch21
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The resource-based view of the firm (RBV) is an influential theoretical framework for understanding how competitive advantage within firms is achieved and how that advantage might be sustained over time. This perspective focuses on the internal organization of firms, and so is a complement to the traditional emphasis of strategy on industry structure and strategic positioning within that structure as the determinants of competitive advantage. In particular, RBV assumes that firms can be conceptualized as bundles of resources, that those resources are heterogeneously distributed across firms, and that resource differences persist over time. Based on these assumptions, researchers have theorized that when firms have resources that are valuable, rare, inimitable, and nonsubstitutable (i.e., so-called VRIN attributes), they can achieve sustainable competitive advantage by implementing fresh value-creating strategies that cannot be easily duplicated by competing firms. Finally, when these resources and their related activity systems have complementarities, their potential to create sustained competitive advantage is enhanced.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781405164054.ch21

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. 10.5465/amr.1995.9507312922 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Christensen C., 1997, Managing Innovation at NYPRO, Inc. (A) (B)
  3. Collis D. J., 1995, Competing on resources, Harvard Business Review, 73, 118
  4. Eisenhardt K. M.andSull D.2001.What is strategy in the new economy?Harvard Business Review.
  5. Graebner M.1999.A review of recent research on mergers and acquisitions. Working paper Stanford University Stanford CA.
  6. 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<961::AID-SMJ132>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI
  7. 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1061::AID-SMJ116>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI
  8. Magretta J., 1998, The power of virtual integration: an interview with Dell Computer's Michael Dell, Harvard Business Review, 76, 72
  9. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1 <15::AID-SMJ916>3.0.CO;2-1 · DOI
  10. Penrose E. T., 1959, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm
  11. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199907)20:7<595::AID-SMJ47>3.0.CO;2-5 · DOI
  12. Wetlaufer S., 2000, Common sense and conflict: an interview with Disney's Michael Eisner, Harvard Business Review, 78, 114
  13. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199912)20:12<1087::AID-SMJ71>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 368

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
ORCID
Eisenhardt, Kathleen M.
Venue
The SMS Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Capabilities
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-08-18
Pages
341-363
DOI
10.1002/9781405164054.ch21
OpenAlex
W3125814141
Cited by
368
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 148 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
Keywords
dynamic capabilities, resource-based view, competitive advantage, resource complementarity, sustainable competitive advantage, firm resources, strategy theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review