The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-reported differences in creativity by ethnicity and gender
Abstract
Creativity assessment has been proposed as a supplement to intellectual testing, in part because of reduced differences by ethnicity; creativity testing might also specifically help reduce stereotype threat. Recent trends in creativity research point to a domain-specific view challenging the more traditional generalist view. With these trends in mind, the current study assessed creative self-perceptions of 3553 students and community members in 56 different possible domains distributed across five factors (as determined by principal components analysis). African Americans were less likely to fall prone to gender stereotypes in creativity. In addition, African Americans and Native Americans tended to rate themselves as more creative than other ethnicities. Specific trends in the factors and implications for future research are discussed. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797 · Cited by 9,020
A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance
Steele, C. M. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.6.613 · Cited by 6,770
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
Devine, P. G. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 · Cited by 5,673
Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance׳s (1958 to present) longitudinal data
Plucker, J. A. (1999) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1202_3 · Cited by 390
Cited by
Leadership, creativity and innovation: a meta-analytic review
Lee, A., Legood, A., Hughes, D., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Knight, C. (2020) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2019.1661837 · Cited by 425
Lee, C. S., & Therriault, D. J. (2013) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.008 · Cited by 402
Expertise, Domains, and the Consensual Assessment Technique
KAUFMAN, J. C., BAER, J., & COLE, J. C. (2009) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01316.x · Cited by 210
Self-citationShaw, A., Kapnek, M., & Morelli, N. A. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.678033 · Cited by 71
Social network site changes over time: The case of MySpace
Wilkinson, D., & Thelwall, M. (2010) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21397 · Cited by 29
The development of augmented reality framework to enhance students’ motivation
Zain, F. M., Kasim, M., Rahman, F. A., & Yaakob, M. F. M. (2026) · Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) · doi:10.11591/edulearn.v20i1.21294
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaufman, J. C.
- Venue
- Applied Cognitive Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1065-1082
- ISSN
- 0888-4080 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0720
- OpenAlex
- W2103426848
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 3.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
