The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
3D Fiber‐Deposited Electrospun Integrated Scaffolds Enhance Cartilage Tissue Formation
Abstract
Despite the periodical and completely interconnected pore network that characterizes rapid prototyped scaffolds, cell seeding efficiency remains still a critical factor for optimal tissue regeneration. This can be mainly attributed to the current resolution limits in pore size. We present here novel three‐dimensional (3D) scaffolds fabricated by combining 3D fiber deposition (3DF) and electrospinning (ESP). Scaffolds consisted of integrated 3DF periodical macrofiber and random ESP microfiber networks (3DFESP). The 3DF scaffold provides structural integrity and mechanical properties, while the ESP network works as a “sieving” and cell entrapment system and offers?at the same time?cues at the extracellular matrix (ECM) scale. Primary bovine articular chondrocytes were isolated, seeded, and cultured for four weeks on 3DF and 3DFESP scaffolds to evaluate the influence of the integrated ESP network on cell entrapment and on cartilage tissue formation. 3DFESP scaffolds enhanced cell entrapment as compared to 3DF scaffolds. This was accompanied by a higher amount of ECM (expressed in terms of sulphated glycosaminoglycans or GAG) and a significantly higher GAG/DNA ratio after 28 days. SEM analysis revealed rounded cell morphology on 3DFESP scaffolds. Spread morphology was observed on 3DF scaffolds, suggesting a direct influence of fiber dimensions on cell differentiation. Furthermore, the ESP surface topology also influenced cell morphology. Thus, the integration of 3DF and ESP techniques provide a new set of “smart” scaffolds for tissue engineering applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploring and Engineering the Cell Surface Interface
Stevens, M. M., & George, J. H. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1106587 · Cited by 2,607
Keun Kwon, I., Kidoaki, S., & Matsuda, T. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.007 · Cited by 607
Electrospinning polydioxanone for biomedical applications
Boland, E. D., Coleman, B. D., Barnes, C. P., Simpson, D. G., Wnek, G. E., & Bowlin, G. L. (2005) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2004.09.003 · Cited by 302
Cited by
Nanotechnological strategies for engineering complex tissues
Dvir, T., Timko, B. P., Kohane, D. S., & Langer, R. (2011) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2010.246 · Cited by 1,367
Sobral, J. M., Caridade, S. G., Sousa, R. A., Mano, J. F., & Reis, R. L. (2011) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.003 · Cited by 561
Recent Advances in Electrospun Nanofibers for Wound Healing
Chen, S., Liu, B., Carlson, M. A., Gombart, A. F., Reilly, D. A., & Xie, J. (2017) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/nnm-2017-0017 · Cited by 409
Chen, J., Huang, X., Sun, B., Wang, Y., Zhu, Y., & Jiang, P. (2017) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.7b08061 · Cited by 375
Technological advances in electrospinning of nanofibers
Teo, W.-E., Inai, R., & Ramakrishna, S. (2011) · Science and Technology of Advanced Materials · doi:10.1088/1468-6996/12/1/013002 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Moroni, L., Schotel, R., Hamann, D., de Wijn, J. R., & van Blitterswijk, C. A.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-12-18
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-60
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2086263913
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 3D Fiber‐Deposited Electrospun Integrated Scaffolds Enhance Cartilage Tissue Formation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.200601158
- The paper
- Moroni, L., Schotel, R., Hamann, D., de Wijn, J. R., & van Blitterswijk, C. A. (2008). 3D Fiber‐Deposited Electrospun Integrated Scaffolds Enhance Cartilage Tissue Formation. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200601158
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.