Cited by 549Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsSilk-based biomaterials and applicationsNanomaterials and Printing Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Carbonized Silk Nanofiber Membrane for Transparent and Sensitive Electronic Skin

Wang, Qi, Jian, Muqiang, Wang, Chunya, Zhang, Yingying·2017·Advanced Functional Materials

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed the explosive development of electronic skin. Highly sensitive pressure sensing is one of the primary abilities of electronic skin. To date, most of the reported skin‐like pressure sensors are based on nanomaterials and microstructured polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) films, limiting their wide practical applications due to the unknown biotoxicity and the redundant fabrication procedure. A cost‐effective, large‐area‐capable, and biocompatible approach for fabrication of high‐performance skin‐like pressure sensors is highly desired. Silk fibroin (SF) is a natural protein that has recently drawn great attention due to its application as the substrate for flexible electronics. Here, the fabrication of skin‐like pressure sensors is demonstrated using SF‐derived active materials. Flexible and conformal pressure sensors can be fabricated using transparent carbonized silk nanofiber membranes (CSilkNM) and unstructured PDMS films through a cost‐effective and large‐scale capable approach. Due to the unique N‐doped carbon nanofiber network structure of CSilkNM, the obtained pressure sensor shows superior performance, including ultrahigh sensitivity (34.47 kPa−1) for a broad pressure range, an ultralow detection limit (0.8 Pa), rapid response time (<16.7 ms), and high durability (>10 000 cycles). Based on its superior performance, its applications in monitoring human physiological signals, sensing subtle touch, and detecting spatial distribution of pressure are demonstrated.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adfm.201605657

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Munir S., 2008, Am. J. Hypertens., 294, H1645

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–549 of 549

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Q., Jian, M., Wang, C., & Zhang, Y.
Affiliations
Tsinghua University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Yingying
Venue
Advanced Functional Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-01-19
Volume
27
Issue
9
ISSN
  • 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-3028
OpenAlex
W2577138790
Cited by
549
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 17
FWCI
27.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advanced Functional Materials (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (51672153, 51422204, 51372132)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies
Keywords
electronic skin, pressure sensors, silk fibroin, N-doped carbon nanofibers, PDMS film, flexible electronics, biocompatible sensors, transparent sensors, physiological monitoring, tactile sensing, pressure distribution sensing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review