Cited by 110Luminescence and Fluorescent MaterialsAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

NIR‐II Excitable Conjugated Polymer Dots with Bright NIR‐I Emission for Deep In Vivo Two‐Photon Brain Imaging Through Intact Skull

Wang, Shaowei, Liu, Jie, Feng, Guangxue, Ng, Lai Guan, Liu, Bin·2019·Advanced Functional Materials

Abstract

Methods for noninvasive brain imaging are highly desirable to study brain structures in neuroscience. Two‐photon fluorescence microscopy (2PFM) with near‐infrared (NIR) light excitation is a relatively noninvasive approach commonly used to study brain with high spatial resolution and large imaging depth. However, most of the current studies require cranial window implantation or skull‐thinning methods due to attenuation of excitation light. 2PFM through intact mouse skull is challenging due to strong scattering induced by skull bone. Herein, NIR‐II light excitable single‐chain conjugated polymer dots (CPdots) with bright fluorescence in NIR‐I region (peak at ≈725 nm and quantum yield of 20.6 ± 1.0%) are developed for deep in vivo two‐photon fluorescence (2PF) imaging of intact mouse brain. The synthesized CPdots exhibit good biocompatibility, high photostability, and large two‐photon absorption cross section. The CPdots allow 2PF images acquired upon excitation at 800, 1040 and 1200 nm with the highest signal‐to‐background ratio of 208 demonstrated for 1200 nm excitation. Moreover, a 3D reconstruction of the brain blood vessel network is obtained with a large vertical depth of 400 µm through intact skull. This work demonstrates great potential of bright NIR fluorophores for in vivo deep tissue imaging.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adfm.201808365

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, S., Liu, J., Feng, G., Ng, L. G., & Liu, B.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Nanjing Tech University (CN)
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
Corresponding author
Liu, Bin
Venue
Advanced Functional Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-01-21
Volume
29
Issue
15
ISSN
  • 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-3028
OpenAlex
W2911303457
Cited by
110
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 9
FWCI
6.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advanced Functional Materials (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation Singapore (R279‐000‐483‐281)
  • National University of Singapore (R279‐000‐482‐133)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Keywords
two-photon fluorescence imaging, deep tissue imaging, neuroimaging, two-photon absorption cross section, biocompatibility, photostability, mouse brain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review