Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 503

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Extrusion Bioprinting of Shear‐Thinning Gelatin Methacryloyl Bioinks

Open access
Liu, Wanjun, Heinrich, Marcel A., Zhou, Yixiao, Akpek, Ali, Hu, Ning, Liu, Xiao, Guan, Xiaofei, Zhong, Zhe, Jin, Xiangyu, Khademhosseini, Ali, Zhang, Yu Shrike·2017·Advanced Healthcare Materials

Abstract

Bioprinting is an emerging technique for the fabrication of 3D cell‐laden constructs. However, the progress for generating a 3D complex physiological microenvironment has been hampered by a lack of advanced cell‐responsive bioinks that enable bioprinting with high structural fidelity, particularly in the case of extrusion‐based bioprinting. Herein, this paper reports a novel strategy to directly bioprint cell‐laden gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) constructs using bioinks of GelMA physical gels (GPGs) achieved through a simple cooling process. Attributed to their shear‐thinning and self‐healing properties, the GPG bioinks can retain the shape and form integral structures after deposition, allowing for subsequent UV crosslinking for permanent stabilization. This paper shows the structural fidelity by bioprinting various 3D structures that are typically challenging to fabricate using conventional bioinks under extrusion modes. Moreover, the use of the GPG bioinks enables direct bioprinting of highly porous and soft constructs at relatively low concentrations (down to 3%) of GelMA. It is also demonstrated that the bioprinted constructs not only permit cell survival but also enhance cell proliferation as well as spreading at lower concentrations of the GPG bioinks. It is believed that such a strategy of bioprinting will provide many opportunities in convenient fabrication of 3D cell‐laden constructs for applications in tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, and pharmaceutical screening.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adhm.201601451

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Cited by

See all 503

Metadata

Authors
Liu, W., Heinrich, M. A., Zhou, Y., Akpek, A., Hu, N., Liu, X., Guan, X., Zhong, Z., Jin, X., Khademhosseini, A., & Zhang, Y. S.
Venue
Advanced Healthcare Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-05-02
Volume
6
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 2192-2640 (ISSN-L)
  • 2192-2659
OpenAlex
W2610636146
Cited by
503
References
52
FWCI
17.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extrusion Bioprinting of Shear‐Thinning Gelatin Methacryloyl Bioinks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adhm.201601451
The paper
Liu, W., Heinrich, M. A., Zhou, Y., Akpek, A., Hu, N., Liu, X., Guan, X., Zhong, Z., Jin, X., Khademhosseini, A., & Zhang, Y. S. (2017). Extrusion Bioprinting of Shear‐Thinning Gelatin Methacryloyl Bioinks. Advanced Healthcare Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201601451

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.