The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Size‐Dependent EPR Effect of Polymeric Nanoparticles on Tumor Targeting
Open accessAbstract
Passive targeting of large nanoparticles by the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect is a crucial concept for solid tumor targeting in cancer nanomedicine. There is, however, a trade‐off between the long‐term blood circulation of nanoparticles and their nonspecific background tissue uptake. To define this size‐dependent EPR effect, near‐infrared fluorophore‐conjugated polyethylene glycols (PEG‐ZW800s; 1–60 kDa) are designed and their biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, and renal clearance are evaluated in tumor‐bearing mice. The targeting efficiency of size‐variant PEG‐ZW800s is investigated in terms of tumor‐to‐background ratio (TBR). Interestingly, smaller sized PEGs (≤20 kDa, 12 nm) exhibit significant tumor targeting with minimum to no nonspecific uptakes, while larger sized PEGs (>20 kDa, 13 nm) accumulate highly in major organs, including the lungs, liver, and pancreas. Among those tested, 20 kDa PEG‐ZW800 exhibits the highest TBR, while excreting unbound molecules to the urinary bladder. This result lays a foundation for engineering tumor‐targeted nanoparticles and therapeutics based on the size‐dependent EPR effect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery
Blanco, E., Shen, H., & Ferrari, M. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3330 · Cited by 7,002
Analysis of nanoparticle delivery to tumours
Wilhelm, S., Tavares, A. J., Dai, Q., Ohta, S., Audet, J., Dvorak, H. F., & Chan, W. C. W. (2016) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.14 · Cited by 5,218
Liposomal drug delivery systems: From concept to clinical applications
Allen, T. M., & Cullis, P. R. (2013) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.037 · Cited by 4,839
Renal clearance of quantum dots
Soo Choi, H., Liu, W., Misra, P., Tanaka, E., Zimmer, J. P., Itty Ipe, B., Bawendi, M. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1340 · Cited by 4,476
Effect of pegylation on pharmaceuticals
Harris, J. M., & Chess, R. B. (2003) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1033 · Cited by 3,431
Accumulation of sub-100 nm polymeric micelles in poorly permeable tumours depends on size
Cabral, H., Matsumoto, Y., Mizuno, K., Chen, Q., Murakami, M., Kimura, M., Terada, Y., Kano, M. R., Miyazono, K., Uesaka, M., et al. (2011) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2011.166 · Cited by 2,429
Design considerations for tumour-targeted nanoparticles
Choi, H. S., Liu, W., Liu, F., Nasr, K., Misra, P., Bawendi, M. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2010) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2009.314 · Cited by 754
Self-citationKim, S. E., Zhang, L., Ma, K., Riegman, M., Chen, F., Ingold, I., Conrad, M., Turker, M. Z., Gao, M., Jiang, X., et al. (2016) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2016.164 · Cited by 622
Cited by
Polymeric Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery
Beach, M. A., Nayanathara, U., Gao, Y., Zhang, C., Xiong, Y., Wang, Y., & Such, G. K. (2024) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00705 · Cited by 1,155
Xu, M., Qi, Y., Liu, G., Song, Y., Jiang, X., & Du, B. (2023) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c05853 · Cited by 632
Polymeric Delivery of Therapeutic Nucleic Acids
Kumar, R., Santa Chalarca, C. F., Bockman, M. R., Bruggen, C. V., Grimme, C. J., Dalal, R. J., Hanson, M. G., Hexum, J. K., & Reineke, T. M. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00997 · Cited by 365
Strategies to improve the EPR effect: A mechanistic perspective and clinical translation
Ikeda-Imafuku, M., Wang, L. L.-W., Rodrigues, D., Shaha, S., Zhao, Z., & Mitragotri, S. (2022) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.03.043 · Cited by 330
Rahim, M. A., Jan, N., Khan, S., Shah, H., Madni, A., Khan, A., Jabar, A., Khan, S., Elhissi, A., Hussain, Z., et al. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13040670 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Kang, H., Rho, S., Stiles, W. R., Hu, S., Baek, Y., Hwang, D. W., Kashiwagi, S., Kim, M. S., & Choi, H. S.
- Venue
- Advanced Healthcare Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-12-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e1901223-e1901223
- ISSN
- 2192-2640 (ISSN-L)
- 2192-2659
- OpenAlex
- W2992584767
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 11.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Size‐Dependent EPR Effect of Polymeric Nanoparticles on Tumor Targeting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adhm.201901223
- The paper
- Kang, H., Rho, S., Stiles, W. R., Hu, S., Baek, Y., Hwang, D. W., Kashiwagi, S., Kim, M. S., & Choi, H. S. (2020). Size‐Dependent EPR Effect of Polymeric Nanoparticles on Tumor Targeting. Advanced Healthcare Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201901223
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.