CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 107Photonic and Optical DevicesSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices

On‐Chip Integrated Quantum‐Dot–Silicon‐Nitride Microdisk Lasers

Open access
Xie, Weiqiang, Stöferle, Thilo, Rainò, Gabriele, Aubert, Tangi, Bisschop, Suzanne, Zhu, Yunpeng, Mahrt, Rainer F., Geiregat, Pieter +3 more·2017·Advanced Materials
DOI 10.1002/adma.201604866
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Hybrid silicon nitride (SiN)–quantum-dot (QD) microlasers coupled to a passive SiN output waveguide with a 7 µm diameter and a record-low threshold density of 27 µJ cm−2 are demonstrated. A new design and processing scheme offers long-term stability and facilitates in-depth QD material and device characterization, thereby opening new paths for optical communication, sensing, and on-chip cavity quantum optics based on colloidal QDs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.201604866

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This linewidth is the record value for monolithically integrated CMOS compatible lasers.

    “and is the record value for monolithicaly integrated CMOS compatible lasers. 42”

    From Monolithically Integrated Perovskite Semiconductor Lasers on Silicon Photonic Chips by Scalable Top-Down Fabrication (2018) · cites this paper as [42]

    The device characterization (p. 6) reports linewidth narrowing from 0.58 nm to 0.14 nm, and the fabrication description (p. 3) calls the process CMOS-like. Our copy does not compare that linewidth with other monolithically integrated CMOS-compatible lasers or identify any linewidth as a record (searched: linewidth, record, and CMOS-compatible integrated lasers). (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. [1]E. S. Hosseini, S. Yegnanarayanan, A. H. Atabaki, M. Soltani, A. Adibi, Opt. Express 2009 , 17, 14543.
  2. [2]M. Ghulinyan, R. Guider, G. Pucker, L. Pavesi, IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2011 , 23, 1166.
  3. [3]J. F. Bauters, M. J. R. Heck, D. John, D. X. Dai, M. C. Tien, J. S. Barton, A. Leinse, R. G. Heideman, D. J. Blumenthal, J. E. Bowers, Opt. Express 2011 , 19, 3163.
  4. [4]M. C. Tien, J. F. Bauters, M. J. R. Heck, D. T. Spencer, D. J. Blumenthal, J. E. Bowers, Opt. Express 2011 , 19, 13551.
  5. [5]S. Romero-Garcia, F. Merget, F. Zhong, H. Finkelstein, J. Witzens, Opt. Express 2013 , 21, 14036.
  6. [6]Q. Li, A. A. Eftekhar, M. Sodagar, Z. X. Xia, A. H. Atabaki, A. Adibi, Opt. Express 2013 , 21, 18236.
  7. [7]A. Z. Subramanian, P. Neutens, A. Dhakal, R. Jansen, T. Claes, X. Rottenberg, F. Peyskens, S. Selvaraja, P. Helin, B. Du Bois, K. Leyssens, S. Severi, P. Deshpande, R. Baets, P. Van Dorpe, IEEE Photonics J. 2013 , 5.
  8. [8]V. I. Klimov, A. A. Mikhailovsky, S. Xu, A. Malko, J. A. Hollingsworth, C. A. Leatherdale, H. J. Eisler, M. G. Bawendi, Science 2000 , 290, 314.
  9. [9]R. D. Schaller, M. A. Petruska, V. I. Klimov, J. Phys. Chem. B 2003 , 107, 13765.
  10. [10]V. I. Klimov, S. A. Ivanov, J. Nanda, M. Achermann, I. Bezel, J. A. McGuire, A. Piryatinski, Nature 2007 , 447, 441.
  11. [12]C. Dang, J. Lee, C. Breen, J. S. Steckel, S. Coe-Sullivan, A. Nurmikko, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012 , 7, 335.
  12. [13]B. Guzelturk, Y. Kelestemur, M. Olutas, S. Delikanli, H. V. Demir, Acs Nano 2014 , 8, 6599.
  13. [14]J. Q. Grim, S. Christodoulou, F. Di Stasio, R. Krahne, R. Cingolani, L. Manna, I. Moreels, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014 , 9, 891.
  14. [15]C. X. She, I. Fedin, D. S. Dolzhnikov, A. Demortiere, R. D. Schaller, M. Pelton, D. V. Talapin, Nano Lett. 2014 , 14, 2772.
  15. [16]C. X. She, I. Fedin, D. S. Dolzhnikov, P. D. Dahlberg, G. S. Engel, R. D. Schaller, D. V. Talapin, Acs Nano 2015 , 9, 9475.
  16. [17]Y. Wang, V. D. Ta, Y. Gao, T. C. He, R. Chen, E. Mutlugun, H. V. Demir, H. D. Sun, Adv. Mater. 2014 , 26, 2954.
  17. [18]Y. S. Park, W. K. Bae, T. Baker, J. Lim, V. I. Klimov, Nano Lett. 2015 , 15, 7319.
  18. [19]B. Guzelturk, Y. Kelestemur, K. Gungor, A. Yeltik, M. Z. Akgul, Y. Wang, R. Chen, C. Dang, H. D. Sun, H. V. Demir, Adv. Mater. 2015 , 27, 2741.
  19. [20]H. J. Eisler, V. C. Sundar, M. G. Bawendi, M. Walsh, H. I. Smith, V. Klimov, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002 , 80, 4614.
  20. [21]A. V. Malko, A. A. Mikhailovsky, M. A. Petruska, J. A. Hollingsworth, H. Htoon, M. G. Bawendi, V. I. Klimov, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002 , 81, 1303.
  21. [22]M. Kazes, D. Y. Lewis, Y. Ebenstein, T. Mokari, U. Banin, Adv. Mater. 2002 , 14, 317.
  22. [23]S. I. Shopova, G. Farca, A. T. Rosenberger, W. M. S. Wickramanayake, N. A. Kotov, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004 , 85, 6101.
  23. [24]P. T. Snee, Y. H. Chan, D. G. Nocera, M. G. Bawendi, Adv. Mater. 2005 , 17, 1131.
  24. [25]B. Min, S. Kim, K. Okamoto, L. Yang, A. Scherer, H. Atwater, K. Vahala, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006 , 89, 191124.
  25. [26]J. Schafer, J. P. Mondia, R. Sharma, Z. H. Lu, A. S. Susha, A. L. Rogach, L. J. Wang, Nano Lett. 2008 , 8, 1709.
  26. [27]C. Grivas, C. Y. Li, P. Andreakou, P. F. Wang, M. Ding, G. Brambilla, L. Manna, P. Lagoudakis, Nat. Commun. 2013 , 4, 2376.
  27. [28]M. M. Adachi, F. J. Fan, D. P. Sellan, S. Hoogland, O. Voznyy, A. J. Houtepen, K. D. Parrish, P. Kanjanaboos, J. A. Malen, E. H. Sargent, Nat. Commun. 2015 , 6, 8694.
  28. [29]Y. Wang, K. E. Fong, S. C. Yang, V. D. Ta, Y. Gao, Z. Wang, V. Nalla, H. V. Demir, H. D. Sun, Laser Photonics Rev. 2015 , 9, 507.
  29. [30]W. Q. Xie, Y. P. Zhu, T. Aubert, S. Verstuyft, Z. Hens, D. Van Thourhout, Opt. Express 2015 , 23, 12152.
  30. [31]W. Q. Xie, Y. P. Zhu, T. Aubert, Z. Hens, E. Brainis, D. Van Thourhout, Opt. Express 2016 , 24, A114.
  31. [32]M. Cirillo, T. Aubert, R. Gomes, R. Van Deun, P. Emplit, A. Biermann, H. Lange, C. Thomsen, E. Brainis, Z. Hens, Chem. Mater. 2014 , 26, 1154.
  32. [33]G. E. Cragg, A. L. Efros, Nano Lett. 2010 , 10, 313.
  33. [34]Y. S. Park, W. K. Bae, L. A. Padilha, J. M. Pietryga, V. I. Klimov, Nano Lett. 2014 , 14, 396.
  34. [35]K. Shaklee, R. Nahory, R. Leheny, J. Lumin. 1973 , 7, 284.
  35. [36]A. F. Oskooi, D. Roundy, M. Ibanescu, P. Bermel, J. D. Joannopoulos, S. G. Johnson, Comput. Phys. Commun. 2010 , 181, 687.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xie, W., Stöferle, T., Rainò, G., Aubert, T., Bisschop, S., Zhu, Y., Mahrt, R. F., Geiregat, P., Brainis, E., Hens, Z., & Van Thourhout, D.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • IBM Research - Zurich (CH)
  • Photonics Research Group and Center for Nano‐ and Biophotonics (NB‐Photonics) Ghent University Technologiepark‐Zwijnaarde 15 iGent 9052 Ghent Belgium
ORCID
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02-15
Volume
29
Issue
16
Pages
1604866
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
DOI
10.1002/adma.201604866
OpenAlex
W2588720706
Cited by
107
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 6
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Advanced Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Photonic and Optical Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Keywords
on-chip lasers, colloidal quantum dots, cavity quantum electrodynamics, optical communication, optical sensing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review