The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Volumetric Bioprinting of Complex Living‐Tissue Constructs within Seconds
Open accessAbstract
Biofabrication technologies, including stereolithography and extrusion‐based printing, are revolutionizing the creation of complex engineered tissues. The current paradigm in bioprinting relies on the additive layer‐by‐layer deposition and assembly of repetitive building blocks, typically cell‐laden hydrogel fibers or voxels, single cells, or cellular aggregates. The scalability of these additive manufacturing technologies is limited by their printing velocity, as lengthy biofabrication processes impair cell functionality. Overcoming such limitations, the volumetric bioprinting of clinically relevant sized, anatomically shaped constructs, in a time frame ranging from seconds to tens of seconds is described. An optical‐tomography‐inspired printing approach, based on visible light projection, is developed to generate cell‐laden tissue constructs with high viability (>85%) from gelatin‐based photoresponsive hydrogels. Free‐form architectures, difficult to reproduce with conventional printing, are obtained, including anatomically correct trabecular bone models with embedded angiogenic sprouts and meniscal grafts. The latter undergoes maturation in vitro as the bioprinted chondroprogenitor cells synthesize neo‐fibrocartilage matrix. Moreover, free‐floating structures are generated, as demonstrated by printing functional hydrogel‐based ball‐and‐cage fluidic valves. Volumetric bioprinting permits the creation of geometrically complex, centimeter‐scale constructs at an unprecedented printing velocity, opening new avenues for upscaling the production of hydrogel‐based constructs and for their application in tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, and soft robotics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Designer matrices for intestinal stem cell and organoid culture
Gjorevski, N., Sachs, N., Manfrin, A., Giger, S., Bragina, M. E., Ordóñez-Morán, P., Clevers, H., & Lutolf, M. P. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature20168 · Cited by 1,426
Cited by
Printability and shape fidelity of bioinks in 3D bioprinting
Schwab, A., Levato, R., D’Este, M., Piluso, S., Eglin, D., & Malda, J. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084 · Cited by 1,359
Self-citationAskari, M., Afzali Naniz, M., Kouhi, M., Saberi, A., Zolfagharian, A., & Bodaghi, M. (2021) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/d0bm00973c · Cited by 369
Natural Hydrogel-Based Bio-Inks for 3D Bioprinting in Tissue Engineering: A Review
Fatimi, A., Okoro, O. V., Podstawczyk, D., Siminska-Stanny, J., & Shavandi, A. (2022) · Gels · doi:10.3390/gels8030179 · Cited by 276
Ultrasound-assisted tissue engineering
Melde, K., Athanassiadis, A. G., Missirlis, D., Shi, M., Seneca, S., & Fischer, P. (2024) · Nature Reviews Bioengineering · doi:10.1038/s44222-024-00166-5 · Cited by 59
Hafeez, S., Decarli, M. C., Aldana, A., Ebrahimi, M., Ruiter, F. A. A., Duimel, H., van Blitterswijk, C., Pitet, L. M., Moroni, L., & Baker, M. B. (2023) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202301242 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Bernal, P. N., Delrot, P., Loterie, D., Li, Y., Malda, J., Moser, C., & Levato, R.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-08-19
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 42
- Pages
- e1904209-e1904209
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2969211941
- Cited by
- 604
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Volumetric Bioprinting of Complex Living‐Tissue Constructs within Seconds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201904209
- The paper
- Bernal, P. N., Delrot, P., Loterie, D., Li, Y., Malda, J., Moser, C., & Levato, R. (2019). Volumetric Bioprinting of Complex Living‐Tissue Constructs within Seconds. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201904209
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.