The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
50C Fast‐Charge Li‐Ion Batteries using a Graphite Anode
Abstract
Li‐ion batteries have made inroads into the electric vehicle market with high energy densities, yet they still suffer from slow kinetics limited by the graphite anode. Here, electrolytes enabling extreme fast charging (XFC) of a microsized graphite anode without Li plating are designed. Comprehensive characterization and simulations on the diffusion of Li+ in the bulk electrolyte, charge‐transfer process, and the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) demonstrate that high ionic conductivity, low desolvation energy of Li+, and protective SEI are essential for XFC. Based on the criterion, two fast‐charging electrolytes are designed: low‐voltage 1.8 m LiFSI in 1,3‐dioxolane (for LiFePO 4||graphite cells) and high‐voltage 1.0 m LiPF 6 in a mixture of 4‐fluoroethylene carbonate and acetonitrile (7:3 by vol) (for LiNi 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 O 2||graphite cells). The former electrolyte enables the graphite electrode to achieve 180 mAh g−1 at 50C (1C = 370 mAh g−1), which is 10 times higher than that of a conventional electrolyte. The latter electrolyte enables LiNi 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 O 2||graphite cells (2 mAh cm−2, N/P ratio = 1) to provide a record‐breaking reversible capacity of 170 mAh g−1 at 4C charge and 0.3C discharge. This work unveils the key mechanisms for XFC and provides instructive electrolyte design principles for practical fast‐charging LIBs with graphite anodes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Xu, K., von Cresce, A., & Lee, U. (2010) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la1009994 · Cited by 640
Wide-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion Batteries
Li, Q., Jiao, S., Luo, L., Ding, M. S., Zheng, J., Cartmell, S. S., Wang, C.-M., Xu, K., Zhang, J.-G., & Xu, W. (2017) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.7b04099 · Cited by 229
Self-citationHabedank, J. B., Kriegler, J., & Zaeh, M. F. (2019) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.1241915jes · Cited by 104
Cho, Y.-G., Kim, Y.-S., Sung, D.-G., Seo, M.-S., & Song, H.-K. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee43029d · Cited by 85
Cited by
Hu, W., Peng, Y., Wei, Y., & Yang, Y. (2023) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c00033 · Cited by 429
Lithium-ion batteries and the future of sustainable energy: A comprehensive review
Ngoy, K. R., Lukong, V. T., Yoro, K. O., Makambo, J. B., Chukwuati, N. C., Ibegbulam, C., Eterigho-Ikelegbe, O., Ukoba, K., & Jen, T.-C. (2025) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2025.115971 · Cited by 396
Tu, S., Zhang, B., Zhang, Y., Chen, Z., Wang, X., Zhan, R., Ou, Y., Wang, W., Liu, X., Duan, X., et al. (2023) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-023-01387-5 · Cited by 382
Self-citationWang, R., Wang, L., Liu, R., Li, X., Wu, Y., & Ran, F. (2024) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c08712 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, C., Ji, X., Weng, S., Li, R., Huang, X., Zhu, C., Xiao, X., Deng, T., Fan, L., Chen, L., Wang, X., Wang, C., & Fan, X.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-09-23
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 43
- Pages
- e2206020-e2206020
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W4294842646
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 50C Fast‐Charge Li‐Ion Batteries using a Graphite Anode. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.202206020
- The paper
- Sun, C., Ji, X., Weng, S., Li, R., Huang, X., Zhu, C., Xiao, X., Deng, T., Fan, L., Chen, L., Wang, X., Wang, C., & Fan, X. (2022). 50C Fast‐Charge Li‐Ion Batteries using a Graphite Anode. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202206020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.