Cited by 9Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsMinerals Flotation and Separation Techniques

Facilitating Electrochemical Overall Water Splitting Through Tailoring Halloysite Nanoclay‐Based Nanoarchitectonics of Ionic Environment and Gas‐Bubble Wettability

Das, Jaysri, Phad, Vedant, Saha, Debopriya, Dutta, Sayonti, Dhabal, Debdas, Manna, Uttam·2026·Advanced Materials

Abstract

Unwanted gas bubble adhesion at the electrode surface and its unfavorable microenvironment compromise water splitting performance by perturbing the access of electrolytes and electron transfer processes. While reported bubble‐repellent coatings promote an early detachment of gas bubbles—they mostly fail to provide a favorable ionic microenvironment for overall electrochemical water‐splitting. Here, it has experimentally and theoretically validated the impact of the synergistic association of bubble repellence and selective ionic environments on water splitting performance. Halloysite nanoclay‐based coating with tailored ionic environment and gas‐bubble wettability on nickel foam (NF) ensured a superior performance for hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions (HER and OER) in alkaline medium (1 M KOH). Superaerophobic coatings on NF with cationic modifiers boost HER by polarizing water around the electrode surface, and anionic modifiers improve OER via facilitating OH − availability, leading to 42% and 30% lower overpotentials at a current density of 100 mA cm −2 , respectively. Eventually, it improves gas production by >60% compared to bare NF in alkaline conditions at a given potential. This strategy lowers the cell voltage required for overall water splitting by 500 ± 6 mV while sustaining a current density of 100 mA cm −2 .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.202515325

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Das, J., Phad, V., Saha, D., Dutta, S., Dhabal, D., & Manna, U.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Dhabal, Debdas
  • Manna, Uttam
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-11-10
Volume
38
Issue
6
Pages
e15325-e15325
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W4416093558
Cited by
9
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 9
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advanced Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Electronics and Information technology (no. 5(1)/2022‐NANO)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
Keywords
overall water splitting, halloysite nanoclay, nickel foam, hydrogen evolution reaction, oxygen evolution reaction, alkaline water electrolysis, bubble adhesion, electrocatalysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review